Diagnostic reference levels for common paediatric fluoroscopic examinations performed at a dedicated paediatric Australian hospital

Establishing diagnostic reference levels for pediatric fluoroscopic examinations in a tertiary hospital

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) identify unusually high patient radiation exposures and are required for dose optimisation. DRLs for pediatric fluoroscopic examinations are not widely determined in Australia.

OBJECTIVE

Our objectives were to establish DRLs for pediatric fluoroscopic examinations in a South Australian tertiary hospital and compare these to previously published data and to explore relationships between patient dose area product (DAP), age and fluoroscopy times.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Dose data from 365 pediatric patients undergoing 5 fluoroscopic examinations were retrospectively collected for a 3-year period commencing January 2018 to develop local DRLs. Relationships between DAP, age and fluoroscopy time were explored using scatterplots, Spearman's correlation, and regression analyses.

RESULTS

Local DRLs were significantly lower than data published previously, possibly reflecting technological and procedural advancements. Each 1-year increase in patient age was associated with a 0.77 μGy·m² increase in DAP for barium meal and follow-through studies (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.055, 1.48) (P=0.04), and a 1.37 μGy·m² increase in DAP for barium swallow studies (95% CI=0.61, 2.12) (P<0.001). A low correlation was demonstrated between DAP and fluoroscopy time for micturating cystourethrography studies (r=0.35, 95% CI=0.15, 0.51, P<0.001) and barium meal and follow-through studies (r=0.37, 95% CI= -0.011, 0.65, P=0.05). Age and fluoroscopy time were not significantly related.

CONCLUSION

This study provides updated Australian pediatric fluoroscopic DRLs, with the intention of promoting a national database for benchmarking pediatric doses. The local DRLs can be used for dose comparisons and optimisation between facilities.

Harmonisation of imaging protocols, radiation doses and image quality in gastrointestinal fluoroscopy examinations - multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Paediatric gastrointestinal fluoroscopy examinations can impart varying amounts of radiation for the same patient size and exam type.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the variability of imaging protocol, radiation dose and image quality in paediatric fluoroscopy examinations in order to provide recommendations for the harmonisation and optimisation of local practices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five paediatric radiology departments performing fluoroscopically-guided contrast enema, micturating cystourethrography and upper gastrointestinal tract examinations participated in this study. Information on imaging protocols and radiation doses was retrospectively collected for more than 2,400 examinations. Image quality was analysed on clinical and phantom images.

RESULTS

Patient doses showed great variability among centers with up to a factor of 5 for similar fluoroscopy times. The five departments had imaging protocols with major differences in fluoroscopy dose regulation curves and additional filtration. Image quality analysis on phantoms and patients images showed no major improvement in contrast, spatial resolution or noise when increasing the radiation dose. Age-based diagnostic reference levels using both dose area product and fluoroscopy time were proposed per procedure type.

CONCLUSION

Disparities between centers and no correlation of radiation dose with image quality criteria create margins for optimisation. These results highlight the need for guidelines on fluoroscopy image quality and dose reference levels in paediatric gastrointestinal examinations to harmonise practices and optimise patient dose.

Radiation Safety in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study: Systematic Review

Videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) is generally used to diagnose dysphagia and oropharyngeal aspiration during swallowing movement. Patients and bolus-feeding operators (such as occupational therapist and speech language pathologist) may undergo multiple VFSS procedure, placing them at risk for more radiation exposure due to increased scan time. The present study investigated the dose-area product, effective dose of various protocols, and summarized dose reports from various studies of VFSS. The PubMed database searched for relevant publications reporting radiation dose in the VFSS procedure. 13 articles were selected to be reviewed. This systematic review involved 13 peer-reviewed articles that reported the specific dose of the VFSS procedure. The articles were categorized into three types: operator radiation dose, adult patient radiation dose, and pediatric radiation dose. The operator dose reports showed that the operators' scattering exposure, equivalent dose (across the whole body, eyes, and hands), and annual effective dose were significantly lower than the annual dose limit of 20 mSv. Both adult and pediatric patient dose reports showed that the effective dose, which was estimated from recorded dose-area product, was significantly lower than the annual background exposure of 2.4 mSv in various protocols. The present literature review suggested that the radiation dose of VFSS by modified barium swallowing is acceptable in both operators and patients. However, various radiation protection strategies should be conducted during the procedure to reduce the risk of stochastic effect.

Estimation of effective dose and radiation risk in pediatric barium studies procedures

The objectives of this study are to assess pediatric radiation exposure in certain barium studies and to quantify the organ and effective doses and radiation risk resultant from patients' irradiation. A total of 69 pediatric barium studies for upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Patients' radiation dose was quantified in terms of Entrance surface air kerma (ESAKs) using exposure parameters and DosCal software. Organ and effective doses (E) were extrapolated using national Radiological Protection Board software (NRPB-R279). The mean ± (SD) and the range of patient doses per procedure were 3.7 ± 0.4 (1.0-13.0)mGy, 7.4 ± 1.7(5.5-8.0)mGy and 1.4 ± 0.9 (0.5-3.6)mGy for barium meal, swallow and enema, respectively. The mean effective doses were 0.3 ± 0.03 (0.08-1.1)mSv, 0.2 ± 1.6 (0.44-0.7)mSv and 0.3 ± 0.9 (0.1-0.8)mSv at the same order. The radiation dose were higher compared to previous studies. Therefore, pediatrics are exposed to avoidable radiation exposure. Certain optimization measures are recommended along with establishing national diagnostic reference level (DRL) to reduce the radiation risk.