Choroidal melanoma treated with stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy and prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab: The Dunedin Hospital experience

Dose-Related Visual Outcomes in the Treatment of Choroidal Melanoma with Stereotactic Radiotherapy

Introduction

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in the treatment of choroidal melanoma (CM) may be indicated if the tumour is located close to the optic nerve or is unsuitable for a radiotherapeutic plaque. It is thought that the rate of visual decline and ocular sequelae with SRT is influenced by dose and location of radiation in relation to important visual structures. This study therefore aimed to look at these prognoses with respect to localisation and dose of radiation when treatment of CM with SRT occurs.

Methods

A retrospective data analysis was conducted on all patients at Dunedin Hospital (DH) from August 2001 to May 2017 who were followed up for 4 years. SRT consisted of 50 Gy divided into five fractions over 5 days to tumours, with 2-mm treatment margins. The primary outcome measure was retention of functional vision - better than hand movements (HMs) within the treated eye. Secondary outcome measures included time to non-functional vision (HM or less) in relation to location, dose and tumour thickness, the presence of radiation retinopathy, local and metastatic tumour progression, enucleation, and disease-specific mortality.

Results

Seventy-five patients were identified in this study. Follow-up was incomplete in 10 patients, and 4 patients became deceased within the 4-year study period. Twenty-nine patients (48%) retained visual acuity (VA) better than HMs in the treated eye at 4 years, and thirty-two (52%) of patients did not. Calculated dose to the optic nerve and macula and proximity of the tumour to the optic nerve and macula were not statistically determinative of vision outcomes, although presenting VA was. Fifty-six per cent of patients developed radiation retinopathy involving the macula. The local progression, metastatic progression and enucleation rates were 4.6%, 6%, and 12.3%, representing 3, 4, and 8 patients, respectively.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that approximately half of patients treated with SRT can expect to maintain functional vision better than HM at 4 years. The rate of visual decline and final vision outcome are independent of location of the tumour in relation to the optic nerve and macula. While it affirms that SRT achieves high rates of local tumour control and eye retention, preservation of functional VA remains an unpredictable endpoint for individual cases and highlights the therapeutic challenge of this treatment modality.

The Burden of Histologically Confirmed Uveal Melanoma in Aotearoa-New Zealand: A 21-year Review of the National Cancer Registry

PURPOSE

The burden of uveal melanoma (UM) in Aotearoa-New Zealand (NZ), a country with the highest global burden of cutaneous melanoma, is unknown. This first, large-scale study of UM in NZ investigates survival and risks of mortality in histologically confirmed UM.

METHODS

Deidentified epidemiological data on histologically confirmed UM between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2020, were extracted from the NZ Cancer Registry. The main outcome measures were patient demographics, tumor characteristics, all-cause versus disease-specific survival, and risks of mortality.

RESULTS

Histologically confirmed UM constituted 1.5% (n=703) of all-body site melanomas in NZ (n=47,997). UM predominantly affected Europeans (95%), followed by NZ indigenous Māori (4%), Asians (<1%), and Pacific Peoples (<1%), with no eye or sex predilection. Three hundred eighteen (45%) were deceased at follow-up. Of the deceased, 50% died from UM. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival from all-cause mortality was 94%, 68%, and 51%, and disease-specific survival was 97%, 79%, and 71%, respectively. Increasing age at UM diagnosis (>60 y), UM arising from nonspecified sites, and mixed cell UM were associated with an increased risk of disease-specific mortality. No difference in disease-specific mortality was found between sex and ethnicity on multivariate and competing risks analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the government-funded public eye care and increasing research and awareness on UM globally, the burden of UM in the 21st century in NZ remains comparable to global studies. We continue to observe an earlier presentation of UM in non-European cohorts, particularly in our Māori population, and further studies on UM in NZ are warranted.

Metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy in combination with targeted therapy or immunotherapy: systematic review and consensus recommendations by the EORTC-ESTRO OligoCare consortium

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with metastatic cancer, especially when characterised by a low tumour burden (ie, oligometastatic disease), receiving targeted therapy or immunotherapy has become a frequently practised and guideline-supported treatment strategy. Despite the increasing use in routine clinical practice, there is little information on the safety of combining SBRT with modern targeted therapy or immunotherapy and a paucity of high-level evidence to guide clinical management. A systematic literature review was performed to identify the toxicity profiles of combined metastases-directed SBRT and targeted therapy or immunotherapy. These results served as the basis for an international Delphi consensus process among 28 interdisciplinary experts who are members of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) OligoCare consortium. Consensus was sought about risk mitigation strategies of metastases-directed SBRT combined with targeted therapy or immunotherapy; a potential need for and length of interruption to targeted therapy or immunotherapy around SBRT delivery; and potential adaptations of radiation dose and fractionation. Results of this systematic review and consensus process compile the best available evidence for safe combination of metastases-directed SBRT and targeted therapy or immunotherapy for patients with metastatic or oligometastatic cancer and aim to guide today's clinical practice and the design of future clinical trials.

Every other day stereotactic radiation therapy for the treatment of uveal melanoma decreases toxicity

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To report the long-term results of stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (SRS/FSRT) in patients with uveal melanoma (UM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the results of patients treated between 2007 and 2019. The primary endpoints were local control (LC), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), enucleation-free survival (EFS) and treatment toxicity.

RESULTS

443 patients with 445 UMs were treated via CyberKnife®. According to the COMS classification, 70% of the tumors were small/medium and 30% were large. Median total RT dose was 54 Gy, median BED10 was 151 Gy. After a median 74-months follow-up, SRS/FSRT yielded an 83% overall LC rate. The 5- and 10-year LRFS rate was 74% and 56%, respectively. Patient age and the COMS size were prognostic for all survival endpoints. An increased SRS/FSRT dose was associated with higher LRFS and EFS rates. SRS/FSRT-related toxicity was observed in 49% of the eyes. Median visual acuity (VA) significantly deteriorated after SRS/FSRT in 76% of the treated eyes. The overall eye preservation rate was 62%, and the 5- and 10-year EFS rate was 64% and 36%, respectively. The delivery of FSRT every other day resulted in a significantly lower rate of toxicity and enucleation compared to FSRT on consecutive days.

CONCLUSION

A total dose of ≥45 Gy and BED_10Gy ≥ 112.5 SRS/FSRT is associated with a higher LC rate in patients with UM. Despite the favorable outcomes, treatment toxicity is the major limitation of this treatment. Toxicity and enucleation can be minimized by treating the eye every other day.

Radiation retinopathy intricacies and advances in management

Background: Radiation retinopathy is a chronic, progressive, vision-threatening complication from exposure to various radiation sources. While several treatment modalities are available, proper management for this disease is a continuing challenge with no consensus on the most efficacious.Objective: The aim of this article is to provide an updated review of the published literature on the course of the disease, available treatments and their efficacies, frequency of regimen, core issues in patient management, and additional newer treatment modalities, including possible prophylactic approaches.Value: We also highlighted the challenges encountered with managing chronically treated patients through an analysis of a clinical case report on a patient who was treated for several years with different modalities after a diagnosis of radiation retinopathy.

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Radiation Retinopathy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review the role of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in treating patients with radiation retinopathy (RR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

RR can be associated with a significant decrease in visual acuity (VA) related to the development of cystoid macular edema, macular ischemia, and proliferative retinopathy leading to neovascular glaucoma.

RESULTS

Anti-VEGF therapy is effective at stabilizing VA in around 80% of patients and achieving reductions in central macular thickness when it is administered using a constant algorithm. Furthermore, consistent prophylactic anti-VEGF therapy reduces the risk of development of RR, neovascularization of the iris, and neovascularization glaucoma.

CONCLUSION

Future studies are needed to determine the optimal regimen for anti-VEGF therapy according to patient risk factors and likelihood of developing RR. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:S44-S49.].