Patient rotation during linac-based photon electron radiotherapy

Compliance of volunteers in a fully-enclosed patient rotation system for MR-guided radiation therapy: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Particle therapy makes a noteworthy contribution in the treatment of tumor diseases. In order to be able to irradiate from different angles, usually expensive, complex and large gantries are used. Instead rotating the beam via a gantry, the patient itself might be rotated. Here we present tolerance and compliance of volunteers for a fully-enclosed patient rotation system in a clinical magnetic resonance (MR)-scanner for potential use in MR-guided radiotherapy, conducted within a prospective evaluation study.

METHODS

A patient rotation system was used to simulate and perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-examinations with 50 volunteers without an oncological question. For 20 participants, the MR-examination within the bore was simulated by introducing realistic MRI noise, whereas 30 participants received an examination with image acquisition. Initially, body parameters and claustrophobia were assessed. The subjects were then rotated to different angles for simulation (0°, 45°, 90°, 180°) and imaging (0°, 70°, 90°, 110°). At each angle, anxiety and motion sickness were assessed using a 6-item State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory (STAI-6) and a modified Motion Sickness Assessment Questionnaire (MSAQ). In addition, general areas of discomfort were evaluated.

RESULTS

Out of 50 subjects, three (6%) subjects terminated the study prematurely. One subject dropped out during simulation due to nausea while rotating to 45°. During imaging, further two subjects dropped out due to shoulder pain from positioning at 90° and 110°, respectively. The average result for claustrophobia (0 = no claustrophobia to 4 = extreme claustrophobia) was none to light claustrophobia (average score: simulation 0.64 ± 0.33, imaging 0.51 ± 0.39). The mean anxiety scores (0% = no anxiety to 100% = maximal anxiety) were 11.04% (simulation) and 15.82% (imaging). Mean motion sickness scores (0% = no motion sickness to 100% = maximal motion sickness) of 3.5% (simulation) and 6.76% (imaging) were obtained across all participants.

CONCLUSION

Our study proves the feasibility of horizontal rotation in a fully-enclosed rotation system within an MR-scanner. Anxiety scores were low and motion sickness was only a minor influence. Both anxiety and motion sickness showed no angular dependency. Further optimizations with regard to immobilization in the rotation device may increase subject comfort.

Pre-treatment and real-time image guidance for a fixed-beam radiotherapy system

PURPOSE

A radiotherapy system with a fixed treatment beam and a rotating patient positioning system could be smaller, more robust and more cost effective compared to conventional rotating gantry systems. However, patient rotation could cause anatomical deformation and compromise treatment delivery. In this work, we demonstrate an image-guided treatment workflow with a fixed beam prototype system that accounts for deformation during rotation to maintain dosimetric accuracy.

METHODS

The prototype system consists of an Elekta Synergy linac with the therapy beam orientated downward and a custom-built patient rotation system (PRS). A phantom that deforms with rotation was constructed and rotated within the PRS to quantify the performance of two image guidance techniques: motion compensated cone-beam CT (CBCT) for pre-treatment volumetric imaging and kilovoltage infraction monitoring (KIM) for real-time image guidance. The phantom was irradiated with a 3D conformal beam to evaluate the dosimetric accuracy of the workflow.

RESULTS

The motion compensated CBCT was used to verify pre-treatment position and the average calculated position was within -0.3 ± 1.1 mm of the phantom's ground truth position at 0°. KIM tracked the position of the target in real-time as the phantom was rotated and the average calculated position was within -0.2 ± 0.8 mm of the phantom's ground truth position. A 3D conformal treatment delivered on the prototype system with image guidance had a 3%/2 mm gamma pass rate of 96.3% compared to 98.6% delivered using a conventional rotating gantry linac.

CONCLUSIONS

In this work, we have shown that image guidance can be used with fixed-beam treatment systems to measure and account for changes in target position in order to maintain dosimetric coverage during horizontal rotation. This treatment modality could provide a viable treatment option when there insufficient space for a conventional linear accelerator or where the cost is prohibitive.

Measurements of human tolerance to horizontal rotation within an MRI scanner: Towards gantry-free radiation therapy

INTRODUCTION

Recent advances in image guidance and adaptive radiotherapy could enable gantry-free radiotherapy using patient rotation. Gantry-free radiotherapy could substantially reduce the cost of radiotherapy systems and facilities. MRI guidance complements a gantry-free approach because of its ability to visualise soft tissue deformation during rotation. A potential barrier to gantry-free radiotherapy is patient acceptability, especially when combined with MRI. This study investigates human experiences of horizontal rotation within an MRI scanner.

METHODS

Ten healthy human participants and nine participants previously treated with radiotherapy were rotated within an MRI scanner. Participants' anxiety and motion sickness was assessed before being rotated in 45-degree increments and paused, representing a multi-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment. An MR image was acquired at each 45-degree angle. Following imaging, anxiety and motion sickness were re-assessed, followed by a comfort questionnaire and exit interview. The significance of the differences in anxiety and motion sickness pre- versus post-imaging was assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Content analysis was performed on exit interview transcripts.

RESULTS

Eight of ten healthy and eight of nine patient participants completed the imaging session. Mean anxiety scores before and after imaging were 7.9/100 and 11.8/100, respectively (P = 0.26), and mean motion sickness scores were 5.3/100 and 13.7/100, respectively (P = 0.02). Most participants indicated likely acceptance of rotation if MRI were to be used in a hypothetical treatment. Physical discomfort was reported to be the biggest concern.

CONCLUSIONS

Horizontal rotation within an MRI scanner was acceptable for most (17/19) participants.

Pelvic organ motion and dosimetric implications during horizontal patient rotation for prostate radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Gantry-free radiation therapy systems utilizing patient rotation would be simpler and more cost effective than the conventional gantry-based systems. Such a system could enable the expansion of radiation therapy to meet global demand and reduce capital costs. Recent advances in adaptive radiation therapy could potentially be applied to correct for gravitational deformation during horizontal patient rotation. This study aims to quantify the pelvic organ motion and the dosimetric implications of horizontal rotation for prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatments.

METHODS

Eight human participants who previously received prostate radiation therapy were imaged in a clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner using a bespoke patient rotation system (PRS). The patients were imaged every 45 degrees during a full roll rotation (0-360 degrees). Whole pelvic bone, prostate, rectum, and bladder motion were compared to the supine position using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean absolute surface distance (MASD). Prostate centroid motion was compared in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) direction prior to and following pelvic bone-guided rigid registration. Seven-field prostate IMRT treatment plans were generated for each patient rotation angles under three adaption scenarios: No plan adaption, rigid planning target volume (PTV)-guided alignment to the prostate, and plan re-optimization. Prostate, rectum, and bladder doses were compared for each adaption scenario.

RESULTS

Pelvic bone motion within the PRS of up to 53 mm relative to the supine position was observed for some participants. Internal organ motion was greatest at the 180-degree PRS couch angle (prone), with prostate centroid motion range < 2 mm LR, 0 mm to 14 mm SI, and -11 mm to 4 mm AP. Rotation with no adaption of the treatment plan resulted in an underdose to the PTV -- in some instances up to 75% (D95%: 78 ± 0.3 Gy at supine to 20 ± 15.0 Gy at the 225-degree PRS couch angle). Bladder dose was reduced during the rotation by up to 98% (V60 Gy: 15.0 ± 9.4% supine to 0.3 ± 0.5% at the 225-degree PRS couch angle). In some instances, the rectum dose increased during rotation (V60Gy: 20.0 ± 4.5% supine to 25.0 ± 15.0% at the 135-degree PRS couch angle). Rigid PTV-guided alignment resulted in PTV coverage which, though statistically lower (P < 0.05 for all D95% values), was within 1 Gy of the supine plans. Plan re-optimization resulted in a statistically equivalent PTV coverage compared to the supine plans (P > 0.05 for all D95% metrics and all within ±0.4 Gy). For both rigid PTV-guided alignment and plan re-optimization, rectum dose volume metrics were reduced compared to the supine position between the 90- and 225-degree PRS couch angles (P < 0.05). Bladder dose volume metrics were not impacted by rotation.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic bone and internal organ motion are present during patient rotation. Rigid PTV-guided alignment to the prostate will be a requirement if prostate IMRT is to be safely delivered using patient rotation. Plan re-optimization for each PRS couch angle to account for anatomical deformations further improves the PTV coverage.

In vivo monitoring of total skin electron dose using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters

AIM

This study retrospectively analysed the results of using optically stimulated radiation dosimeters (OSLDs) for in vivo dose measurements during total skin electron therapy (TSET, also known as TSEI, TSEB, TSEBT, TSI or TBE) treatments of patients with mycosis fungoides.

BACKGROUND

TSET treatments are generally delivered to standing patients, using treatment plans that are devised using manual dose calculations that require verification via in vivo dosimetry. Despite the increasing use of OSLDs for radiation dosimetry, there is minimal published guidance on the use of OSLDs for TSET verification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed in vivo dose measurements made during treatments of nine consecutive TSET patients, treated between 2013 and 2018. Landauer nanoDot OSLDs were used to measure the skin dose at reference locations on each patient, as well as at locations of clinical interest such as the head, hands, feet, axilla and groin.

RESULTS

1301 OSLD measurements were aggregated and analysed, producing results that were in broad agreement with previous TLD studies, while providing additional information about the variation of dose across concave surfaces and potentially guiding future refinement of treatment setup. In many cases these in vivo measurements were used to identify deviations from the planned dose in reference locations and to identify anatomical regions where additional shielding or boost treatments were required.

CONCLUSIONS

OSLDs can be used to obtain measurements of TSET dose that can inform monitor unit adjustments and identify regions of under and over dosage, while potentially informing continuous quality improvement in TSET treatment delivery.

Retrospective analysis of breast radiotherapy treatment plans: Curating the 'non-curated'

INTRODUCTION

This paper provides a demonstration of how non-curated data can be retrospectively cleaned, so that existing repositories of radiotherapy treatment planning data can be used to complete bulk retrospective analyses of dosimetric trends and other plan characteristics.

METHODS

A non curated archive of 1137 radiotherapy treatment plans accumulated over a 12-month period, from five radiotherapy centres operated by one institution, was used to investigate and demonstrate a process of clinical data cleansing, by: identifying and translating inconsistent structure names; correcting inconsistent lung contouring; excluding plans for treatments other than breast tangents and plans without identifiable PTV, lung and heart structures; and identifying but not excluding plans that deviated from the local planning protocol. PTV, heart and lung dose-volume metrics were evaluated, in addition to a sample of personnel and linac load indicators.

RESULTS

Data cleansing reduced the number of treatment plans in the sample by 35.7%. Inconsistent structure names were successfully identified and translated (e.g. 35 different names for lung). Automatically separating whole lung structures into left and right lung structures allowed the effect of contralateral and ipsilateral lung dose to be evaluated, while introducing some small uncertainties, compared to manual contouring. PTV doses were indicative of prescription doses. Breast treatment work was unevenly distributed between oncologists and between metropolitan and regional centres.

CONCLUSION

This paper exemplifies the data cleansing and data analysis steps that may be completed using existing treatment planning data, to provide individual radiation oncology departments with access to information on their own patient populations. Clearly, the well-planned and systematic recording of new, high quality data is the preferred solution, but the retrospective curation of non-curated data may be a useful interim solution, for radiation oncology departments where the systems for recording of new data have yet to be designed and agreed.