Alternative volumetric PET pjmirometers for evaluation of breast cancer cases with 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging: Metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis

Innovations in Positron Emission Tomography and State of the Art in the Evaluation of Breast Cancer Treatment Response

The advent of hybrid Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and PET/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanners resulted in an increased clinical relevance of nuclear medicine in oncology. The use of [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) has also made it possible to study tumors (including breast cancer) from not only a dimensional perspective but also from a metabolic point of view. In particular, the use of [18F]FDG PET allowed early confirmation of the efficacy or failure of therapy. The purpose of this review was to assess the literature concerning the response to various therapies for different subtypes of breast cancer through PET. We start by summarizing studies that investigate the validation of PET/CT for the assessment of the response to therapy in breast cancer; then, we present studies that compare PET imaging (including PET devices dedicated to the breast) with CT and MRI, focusing on the identification of the most useful parameters obtainable from PET/CT. We also focus on novel non-FDG radiotracers, as they allow for the acquisition of information on specific aspects of the new therapies.

Investigation of Added Value of Imaging Performed in a Prone Position to Standard 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging for Staging in Patients with Breast Cancer

Objectives:

To investigate whether additional imaging in a prone position has any value to the supine whole-body ¹⁸fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images by comparing the visual and quantitative data about a local disease in the breast and axilla for the initial staging of breast cancer (BC).

Methods:

In this study, a total of 91 female patients with the BC were studied. Both the supine and prone images were examined based on the axial diameter, number and location of the primary tumor, local invasion signs of the tumor, the number of axillary lymph nodes with a suspected metastasis, metabolic parameters of the primary tumor and axillary lymph nodes, and registration artifacts of the PET and CT images were evaluated individually. These findings were compared with the histopathological data obtained after a surgery.

Results:

In the evaluation of a supine and prone imaging, tumor diameter and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) values of the breast lesions were greater in the supine position than in the prone position. However, there was no significant difference found between the other metabolic parameters of a primary tumor and axilla in both positions. In the supine and prone images, accuracy for skin involvement was 84% and 91.3%, respectively.

Conclusion:

In our study, we observed that, obtaining additional images in the prone position does not significantly benefit the evaluation of a local disease. The average values of the primary tumor diameter and MTV in the prone position appear to be smaller than the one in the supine position. However, the prone imaging in the patients with a newly diagnosed BC may be beneficial in selected patients and may contribute to preventing the false-positive results especially in patients with a suspected skin involvement.

Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting axillary pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer patients: emphasis on breast cancer subtype

Background

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is a widely accepted initial treatment modality that can lead to pathologic downstaging of the axillary disease burden in breast cancer patients. Axillary response as well as baseline ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) differ between breast cancer subtypes. The value of baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in predicting axillary response to NST is not yet established, possibly since breast cancer subtype was not taken into account. The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in predicting axillary response to NST with a specific emphasis on subtype.

Methods

PET-parameters derived from the primary tumor as well as the most FDG-avid axillary lymph node were measured on baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Overall imaging findings were compared with the gold standard of histopathology of the axillary surgery specimen. Analyses for ER-positive/HER2-negative were performed separately from HER2-positive and TN patients. In addition, separate analyses for clinically node-positive patients were performed.

Results

Sixty-six patients with 69 primary tumors were included in this study. Thirty-three axillae contained ER-positive/HER2-negative, 16 HER2-positive, and 20 TN breast cancer. No significant difference in PET-parameters between patients with axillary residual disease and axillary pathologic complete response were found for ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. In the combined HER2-positive/TN subgroup, the SUV_max was significantly lower in patients without residual axillary disease in both the entire cohort and in patients with clinically node-positive disease. In this combined subgroup, a cut-off of 4.89 SUV_max measured on the most FDG-avid axillary lymph node could predict residual axillary disease with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 90%, 69%, 53%, and 95%, respectively.

Conclusions

Predicting axillary response following NST with baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT can be performed when focusing on breast cancer subtypes. The easily computed PET-parameter SUV_max can predict axillary response in HER2-positive and TN breast cancer. This study adds to the accumulating evidence that studies investigating the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer should always take subtypes into account.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-021-00861-z.