Measurements of human tolerance to horizontal rotation within an MRI scanner: Towards gantry-free radiation therapy

Compliance of volunteers in a fully-enclosed patient rotation system for MR-guided radiation therapy: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Particle therapy makes a noteworthy contribution in the treatment of tumor diseases. In order to be able to irradiate from different angles, usually expensive, complex and large gantries are used. Instead rotating the beam via a gantry, the patient itself might be rotated. Here we present tolerance and compliance of volunteers for a fully-enclosed patient rotation system in a clinical magnetic resonance (MR)-scanner for potential use in MR-guided radiotherapy, conducted within a prospective evaluation study.

METHODS

A patient rotation system was used to simulate and perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-examinations with 50 volunteers without an oncological question. For 20 participants, the MR-examination within the bore was simulated by introducing realistic MRI noise, whereas 30 participants received an examination with image acquisition. Initially, body parameters and claustrophobia were assessed. The subjects were then rotated to different angles for simulation (0°, 45°, 90°, 180°) and imaging (0°, 70°, 90°, 110°). At each angle, anxiety and motion sickness were assessed using a 6-item State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory (STAI-6) and a modified Motion Sickness Assessment Questionnaire (MSAQ). In addition, general areas of discomfort were evaluated.

RESULTS

Out of 50 subjects, three (6%) subjects terminated the study prematurely. One subject dropped out during simulation due to nausea while rotating to 45°. During imaging, further two subjects dropped out due to shoulder pain from positioning at 90° and 110°, respectively. The average result for claustrophobia (0 = no claustrophobia to 4 = extreme claustrophobia) was none to light claustrophobia (average score: simulation 0.64 ± 0.33, imaging 0.51 ± 0.39). The mean anxiety scores (0% = no anxiety to 100% = maximal anxiety) were 11.04% (simulation) and 15.82% (imaging). Mean motion sickness scores (0% = no motion sickness to 100% = maximal motion sickness) of 3.5% (simulation) and 6.76% (imaging) were obtained across all participants.

CONCLUSION

Our study proves the feasibility of horizontal rotation in a fully-enclosed rotation system within an MR-scanner. Anxiety scores were low and motion sickness was only a minor influence. Both anxiety and motion sickness showed no angular dependency. Further optimizations with regard to immobilization in the rotation device may increase subject comfort.

Technical note: A method to synthesize magnetic resonance images in different patient rotation angles with deep learning for gantry-free radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Recently, patient rotating devices for gantry-free radiotherapy, a new approach to implement external beam radiotherapy, have been introduced. When a patient is rotated in the horizontal position, gravity causes anatomic deformation. For treatment planning, one feasible method is to acquire simulation images at different horizontal rotation angles.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of synthesizing magnetic resonance (MR) images at patient rotation angles of 180° (prone position) and 90° (lateral position) from those at a rotation angle of 0° (supine position) using deep learning.

METHODS

This study included 23 healthy male volunteers. They underwent MR imaging (MRI) in the supine position and then in the prone (23 volunteers) and lateral (16 volunteers) positions. T1-weighted fast spin echo was performed for all positions with the same parameters. Two two-dimensional deep learning networks, pix2pix generative adversarial network (pix2pix GAN) and CycleGAN, were developed for synthesizing MR images in the prone and lateral positions from those in the supine position, respectively. For the evaluation of the models, leave-one-out cross-validation was performed. The mean absolute error (MAE), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and Hausdorff distance (HD) were used to determine the agreement between the prediction and ground truth for the entire body and four specific organs.

RESULTS

For pix2pix GAN, the synthesized images were visually bad, and no quantitative evaluation was performed. The quantitative evaluation metrics of the body outlines calculated for the synthesized prone and lateral images using CycleGAN were as follows: MAE, 35.63 ± 3.98 and 40.45 ± 5.83, respectively; DSC, 0.97 ± 0.01 and 0.94 ± 0.01, respectively; and HD (in pixels), 16.74 ± 3.55 and 31.69 ± 12.03, respectively. The quantitative metrics of the bladder and prostate performed were also promising for both the prone and lateral images, with mean values >0.90 in DSC (p > 0.05). The mean DSC and HD values of the bilateral femur for the prone images were 0.96 and 3.63 (in pixels), respectively, and 0.78 and 12.65 (in pixels) for the lateral images, respectively (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The CycleGAN could synthesize the MRI at lateral and prone positions using images at supine position, and it could benefit gantry-free radiation therapy.

Characterizing magnetically focused contamination electrons by off-axis irradiation on an inline MRI-Linac

Purpose

The aim of this study is to investigate off‐axis irradiation on the Australian MRI‐Linac using experiments and Monte Carlo simulations. Simulations are used to verify experimental measurements and to determine the minimum offset distance required to separate electron contamination from the photon field.

Methods

Dosimetric measurements were performed using a microDiamond detector, Gafchromic^® EBT3 film, and MOSkin^TM. Three field sizes were investigated including 1.9 × 1.9, 5.8 × 5.8, and 9.7 × 9.6 cm². Each field was offset a maximum distance, approximately 10 cm, from the central magnetic axis (isocenter). Percentage depth doses (PDDs) were collected at a source‐to‐surface distance (SSD) of 1.8 m for fields collimated centrally and off‐axis. PDD measurements were also acquired at isocenter for each off‐axis field to measure electron contamination. Monte Carlo simulations were used to verify experimental measurements, determine the minimum field offset distance, and demonstrate the use of a spoiler to absorb electron contamination.

Results

Off‐axis irradiation separates the majority of electron contamination from an x‐ray beam and was found to significantly reduce in‐field surface dose. For the 1.9 × 1.9, 5.8 × 5.8, and 9.7 × 9.6 cm² field, surface dose was reduced from 120.9% to 24.9%, 229.7% to 39.2%, and 355.3% to 47.3%, respectively. Monte Carlo simulations generally were within experimental error to MOSkin^TM and microDiamond, and used to determine the minimum offset distance, 2.1 cm, from the field edge to isocenter. A water spoiler 2 cm thick was shown to reduce electron contamination dose to near zero.

Conclusions

Experimental and simulation data were acquired for a range of field sizes to investigate off‐axis irradiation on an inline MRI‐Linac. The skin sparing effect was observed with off‐axis irradiation, a feature that cannot be achieved to the same extent with other methods, such as bolusing, for beams at isocenter.

Please Place Your Seat in the Full Upright Position: A Technical Framework for Landing Upright Radiation Therapy in the 21st Century

Delivering radiotherapy to patients in an upright position can allow for increased patient comfort, reduction in normal tissue irradiation, or reduction of machine size and complexity. This paper gives an overview of the requirements for the delivery of contemporary arc and modulated radiation therapy to upright patients. We explore i) patient positioning and immobilization, ii) simulation imaging, iii) treatment planning and iv) online setup and image guidance. Treatment chairs have been designed to reproducibly position seated patients for treatment and can be augmented by several existing immobilisation systems or promising emerging technologies such as soft robotics. There are few solutions for acquiring CT images for upright patients, however, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of upright patients can be produced using the imaging capabilities of standard Linacs combined with an additional patient rotation device. While these images will require corrections to make them appropriate for treatment planning, several methods indicate the viability of this approach. Treatment planning is largely unchanged apart from translating gantry rotation to patient rotation, allowing for a fixed beam with a patient rotating relative to it. Rotation can be provided by a turntable during treatment delivery. Imaging the patient with the same machinery as used in treatment could be advantageous for online plan adaption. While the current focus is using clinical linacs in existing facilities, developments in this area could also extend to lower-cost and mobile linacs and heavy ion therapy.

The adaptation and investigation of cone-beam CT reconstruction algorithms for horizontal rotation fixed-gantry scans of rabbits

Fixed-gantry radiation therapy has been proposed as a low-cost alternative to the conventional rotating-gantry radiation therapy, that may help meet the rising global treatment demand. Fixed-gantry systems require gravitational motion compensated reconstruction algorithms to produce cone-beam CT (CBCT) images of sufficient quality for image guidance. The aim of this work was to adapt and investigate five CBCT reconstruction algorithms for fixed-gantry CBCT images. The five algorithms investigated were Feldkamp-Davis-Kress (FDK), prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS), gravitational motion compensated FDK (GMCFDK), motion compensated PICCS (MCPICCS) (a novel CBCT reconstruction algorithm) and simultaneous motion estimation and iterative reconstruction (SMEIR). Fixed-gantry and rotating-gantry CBCT scans were acquired of 3 rabbits, with the rotating-gantry scans used as a reference. Projections were sorted into rotation bins, based on the angle of rotation of the rabbit during image acquisition. The algorithms were compared using the structural similarity index measure root mean square error, and reconstruction time. Evaluation of the reconstructed volumes showed that, when compared with the reference rotating-gantry volume, the conventional FDK algorithm did not accurately reconstruct fixed-gantry CBCT scans. Whilst the PICCS reconstruction algorithm reduced some motion artefacts, the motion estimation reconstruction methods (GMCFDK, MCPICCS and SMEIR) were able to greatly reduce the effect of motion artefacts on the reconstructed volumes. This finding was verified quantitatively, with GMCFDK, MCPICCS and SMEIR reconstructions having RMSE 17%-19% lower and SSIM 1% higher than a conventional FDK. However, all motion compensated fixed-gantry CBCT reconstructions had a 56%-61% higher RMSE and 1.5% lower SSIM than FDK reconstructions of conventional rotating-gantry CBCT scans. The results show that motion compensation is required to reduce motion artefacts for fixed-gantry CBCT reconstructions. This paper further demonstrates the feasibility of fixed-gantry CBCT scans, and the ability of CBCT reconstruction algorithms to compensate for motion due to horizontal rotation.