Insights into population genetics and evolution of polyploids and their ancestors

When do autopolyploids need poly-sequencing data?

The sequencing depth required to genotype autopolyploid populations is a very controversial topic. Different studies have adopted variable depth values without a clear guide on the optimal sequencing depth value. Many studies suggest high depth thresholds for different ploidies that may not be practical and substantially increase the overall genotyping cost for different projects. However, such conservative thresholds may not be required to achieve the most common research goals. In fact, some recent reports in the field of quantitative genetics found that much lower sequencing depth thresholds could achieve the same accuracy as high depth thresholds. In this manuscript, I discuss when researchers need to use stringent sequencing depth thresholds and when they can use more relaxed ones. I support my argument by calculating the probabilities of sampling different homologues at a given sequencing depth. I also discuss the uses and the uncertainty in calculating a continuous allelic dosage as the proportion of sequencing reads that hold the alternative allele, which is becoming a common method now in quantitative genetics to replace discrete dosage estimation.

Direct introgression of untapped diversity into elite wheat lines

The effective utilization of natural variation has become essential in addressing the challenges that climate change and population growth pose to global food security. Currently adopted protracted approaches to introgress exotic alleles into elite cultivars need substantial transformation. Here, through a strategic three-way crossing scheme among diverse exotics and the best historical elites (exotic/elite1//elite2), 2,867 pre-breeding lines were developed, genotyped and screened for multiple agronomic traits in four mega-environments. A meta-genome-wide association study, selective sweeps and haplotype-block-based analyses unveiled selection footprints in the genomes of pre-breeding lines as well as exotic-specific associations with agronomic traits. A simulation with a neutrality assumption demonstrated that many pre-breeding lines had significant exotic contributions despite substantial selection bias towards elite genomes. National breeding programmes worldwide have adopted 95 lines for germplasm enhancement, and 7 additional lines are being advanced in varietal release trials. This study presents a great leap forwards in the mobilization of GenBank variation to the breeding pipelines.

SeqBreed: a python tool to evaluate genomic prediction in complex scenarios

Background

Genomic prediction (GP) is a method whereby DNA polymorphism information is used to predict breeding values for complex traits. Although GP can significantly enhance predictive accuracy, it can be expensive and difficult to implement. To help design optimum breeding programs and experiments, including genome-wide association studies and genomic selection experiments, we have developed SeqBreed, a generic and flexible forward simulator programmed in python3.

Results

SeqBreed accommodates sex and mitochondrion chromosomes as well as autopolyploidy. It can simulate any number of complex phenotypes that are determined by any number of causal loci. SeqBreed implements several GP methods, including genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), single-step GBLUP, pedigree-based BLUP, and mass selection. We illustrate its functionality with Drosophila genome reference panel (DGRP) sequence data and with tetraploid potato genotype data.

Conclusions

SeqBreed is a flexible and easy to use tool that can be used to optimize GP or genome-wide association studies. It incorporates some of the most popular GP methods and includes several visualization tools. Code is open and can be freely modified. Software, documentation, and examples are available at https://github.com/miguelperezenciso/SeqBreed.

Artificial selection causes significant linkage disequilibrium among multiple unlinked genes in Australian wheat

Australia has one of the oldest modern wheat breeding programs worldwide although the crop was first introduced to the country in 1788. Breeders selected wheat with high adaptation to different Australian climates, while ensuring satisfactory yield and quality. This artificial selection left distinct genomic signatures that can be used to retrospectively understand breeding targets, and to detect economically important alleles. To study the effect of artificial selection on modern cultivars and cultivars released in different Australian states, we genotyped 482 Australian cultivars representing the history of wheat breeding in Australia since 1840. Computer simulation showed that 86 genomic regions were significantly affected by artificial selection. Characterization of 18 major genes known to affect wheat adaptation, yield, and quality revealed that many were affected by artificial selection and contained within regions under selection. Similarly, many reported QTL and genes for yield, quality, and adaptation were also contained in regions affected by artificial selection. These included TaCwi-A1, TaGw2-6A, Sus-2B, TaSus1-7A, TaSAP1-7A, Glu-A1, Glu-B1, Glu-B3, PinA, PinB, Ppo-D1, Psy-A1, Psy-A2, Rht-A1, Rht-B1, Ppd-D1, Vrn-A1, Vrn-B1, and Cre8. Interestingly, 17 regions affected by artificial selection were in moderate-to-high linkage disequilibrium with each other with an average r 2 value of 0.35 indicating strong simultaneous selection on specific alleles. These regions included Glu-B1, TaGw2-6A, Cre8, Ppd-D1, Rht-B1, Vrn-B1, TaSus1-7A, TaSAP1-7A, and Psy-A1 plus multiple QTL affecting wheat yield and yield components. These results highlighted the effects of the long-term artificial selection on Australian wheat germplasm and identified putative regions underlying important traits in wheat.

Boosting Genetic Gain in Allogamous Crops via Speed Breeding and Genomic Selection

Breeding schemes that utilize modern breeding methods like genomic selection (GS) and speed breeding (SB) have the potential to accelerate genetic gain for different crops. We investigated through stochastic computer simulation the advantages and disadvantages of adopting both GS and SB (SpeedGS) into commercial breeding programs for allogamous crops. In addition, we studied the effect of omitting one or two selection stages from the conventional phenotypic scheme on GS accuracy, genetic gain, and inbreeding. As an example, we simulated GS and SB for five traits (heading date, forage yield, seed yield, persistency, and quality) with different genetic architectures and heritabilities (0.7, 0.3, 0.4, 0.1, and 0.3; respectively) for a tall fescue breeding program. We developed a new method to simulate correlated traits with complex architectures of which effects can be sampled from multiple distributions, e.g. to simulate the presence of both minor and major genes. The phenotypic selection scheme required 11 years, while the proposed SpeedGS schemes required four to nine years per cycle. Generally, SpeedGS schemes resulted in higher genetic gain per year for all traits especially for traits with low heritability such as persistency. Our results showed that running more SB rounds resulted in higher genetic gain per cycle when compared to phenotypic or GS only schemes and this increase was more pronounced per year when cycle time was shortened by omitting cycle stages. While GS accuracy declined with additional SB rounds, the decline was less in round three than in round two, and it stabilized after the fourth SB round. However, more SB rounds resulted in higher inbreeding rate, which could limit long-term genetic gain. The inbreeding rate was reduced by approximately 30% when generating the initial population for each cycle through random crosses instead of generating half-sib families. Our study demonstrated a large potential for additional genetic gain from combining GS and SB. Nevertheless, methods to mitigate inbreeding should be considered for optimal utilization of these highly accelerated breeding programs.

Integrating Networks, Phylogenomics, and Population Genomics for the Study of Polyploidy

Duplication events are regarded as sources of evolutionary novelty, but our understanding of general trends for the long-term trajectory of additional genomic material is still lacking. Organisms with a history of whole genome duplication (WGD) offer a unique opportunity to study potential trends in the context of gene retention and/or loss, gene and network dosage, and changes in gene expression. In this review, we discuss the prevalence of polyploidy across the tree of life, followed by an overview of studies investigating genome evolution and gene expression. We then provide an overview of methods in network biology, phylogenomics, and population genomics that are critical for advancing our understanding of evolution post-WGD, highlighting the need for models that can accommodate polyploids. Finally, we close with a brief note on the importance of random processes in the evolution of polyploids with respect to neutral versus selective forces, ancestral polymorphisms, and the formation of autopolyploids versus allopolyploids.