Head-to-head comparison of the heart rate variability between the bisoprolol transdermal patch and bisoprolol fumarate tablet

A Comparative Study to Investigate the Effects of Bisoprolol in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Hypertension When Switched from Tablets to Transdermal Patches

BACKGROUND

Oral beta-blockers are effective for heart failure and hypertension. Here, we conducted a prospective study to investigate the efficacy of the beta-blocker bisoprolol in patients switching from the oral tablet to the transdermal patch.

METHODS

We studied 50 outpatients receiving oral bisoprolol for chronic heart failure and hypertension. After patients switched treatments, we measured heart rate (HR) over 24 h by Holter echocardiography as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were (1) HR at 00:00, 06:00, 12:00, and 18:00, (2) the total number of premature atrial contractions (PACs) over 24 h and the incidence rate per time segment, and the total number of premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) over 24 h and the incidence rate per time segment, (3) blood pressure, (4) atrial natriuretic peptide and B-type natriuretic peptide, and (5) echocardiography.

RESULTS

Minimum, maximum, mean, and total HR over 24 h was not significantly different between the two groups. Mean and maximum HR at 06:00, total PACs, total PVCs, and PVCs at 00:00 to 05:59 and 06:00 to 11:59 were significantly lower in the patch group.

CONCLUSION

Compared with oral bisoprolol, the bisoprolol transdermal patch lowers HR at 06:00 and inhibits the onset of PVCs during sleep and in the morning.

Preventative effects of bisoprolol transdermal patches on postoperative atrial fibrillation in high-risk patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: A subanalysis of the MAMACARI study

BACKGROUND

Perioperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after non-cardiac surgery is a risk factor for cardiovascular events including stroke and death. The aim of this subanalysis of the MAMACARI study, a multicenter randomized control study on the effectiveness of a bisoprolol transdermal patch for prevention of perioperative myocardial injury in high-risk patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, was to identify the predictors of POAF after non-cardiac surgery in high-risk patients and to determine changes in blood pressure and heart rate during bisoprolol patch administration in the perioperative period.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients aged over 60 years with hypertension and a high revised cardiac risk index (≥2) who were scheduled to undergo non-cardiac surgery were randomly assigned to a bisoprolol patch group (n = 120) or a control group (n = 120). We divided the patients into two groups: patients with POAF (POAF group; n = 16) and patients without POAF (non-POAF group; n = 206). Multivariate analysis showed that bisoprolol patch therapy (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.092-0.978) and surgery time of 250 min or more (OR: 4.99, 95% CI: 1.37-18.2) were independently associated with POAF. Although systolic blood pressure did not differ significantly between the two groups throughout the perioperative period, treatment with a bisoprolol patch significantly reduced heart rate throughout the perioperative period compared with that in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Low dose of a bisoprolol patch in the perioperative period was effective for prevention of POAF after non-cardiac surgery in high-risk patients, while long surgery time was an independent risk factor for POAF. It is expected that low dose of a bisoprolol patch can prevent POAF without causing hypotension.

Impact of bisoprolol transdermal patch on early recurrence during the blanking period after atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Early recurrences of atrial arrhythmias (ERAAs) after ablation may require therapeutic intervention. The optimal medical therapy that prevents ERAAs requires clarification. This study aimed to compare the incidence of ERAAs between patients who received or did not receive bisoprolol transdermal patches (BTPs) at 3 months postablation.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study enrolled 203 consecutive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) who had undergone their first ablation, comprising 59 in the BTP group and 144 in the non-BTP group. Follow-up assessments were conducted monthly for 3 months. We evaluated the incidence of ERAAs.

RESULTS

During the initial 1-week observational period, the rate of ERAAs was lower in the BTP group (5.0%) than that in the non-BTP group (18.8%) (P = .013). At 3 months postablation, the rate of ERAAs was lower in the BTP group (6.8%) than that in the non-BTP group (25.7%) (P = .002). The cumulative freedom from ERAAs was significantly lower in the BTP group than in the non-BTP group (log-rank: P = .003). Administering BTPs was an independent factor that protected against ERAAs (odds ratio 0.181, [95% confidence interval 0.059-0.559], P = .003).

CONCLUSION

BTPs may prevent ERAAs after ablation.

Bisoprolol transdermal patch improves orthostatic hypotension in patients with chronic heart failure and hypertension

β blockers (BBs) play an important role in heart failure (HF) treatment. However, orthostatic hypotension (OH) is sometimes caused by BBs. The bisoprolol transdermal patch works more slowly and is long acting compared with the bisoprolol fumarate tablet. The risk of OH may be reduced by using the bisoprolol transdermal patch. We evaluated 57 consecutive patients who were taking the bisoprolol fumarate tablet for chronic HF with hypertension from November 2016 to September 2017. We switched the patients to the bisoprolol transdermal patch. Because 12 of 57 subjects could not continue using the bisoprolol transdermal patch, we analyzed the remaining 45 patients. We investigated BP, blood tests, and changes in BP from supine to standing positions before and after 6 months of switching from tablet to patch. OH was diagnosed by observing a systolic/diastolic BP drop of at least 20/10 mmHg or an absolute systolic BP (sBP) of <90 mmHg from the standing position. No significant changes were observed in the BP and BPs from supine to standing positions, whereas log brain natriuretic peptide was significantly reduced after switching from patch to tablet (2.102 to 2.070pg/dl, P = .039). OH, which occurred in originally 17 patients, showed improvement and eventually appeared in 4 patients. In these patients, changes in BP from supine to standing positions were also significantly improved (changes in sBP, -11 to -6mmHg, P = .016). This study demonstrated that switching from the bisoprolol fumarate tablet to transdermal patch reduced the morbidity of OH in HF patients.

Comparison of the Transdermal Bisoprolol Patch with Oral Bisoprolol Fumarate Administration as a Therapeutic Agent for Idiopathic Frequent Premature Ventricular Contractions

The transdermal bisoprolol patch (TB) was designed to maintain a sustained concentration of bisoprolol in plasma by a higher trough concentration than oral bisoporolol (OB). We compared the efficacy between TB and OB in patients with idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) while considering their duration of action.A total of 78 patients with a PVC count of ≥ 3,000 beats/24 hours were divided into groups treated with TB 4 mg (n = 43) or OB 2.5 mg (n = 35). PVCs were divided into positive heart rate (HR) -dependent PVCs (P-PVCs) and non-positive HR-dependent PVCs (NP-PVCs) based on the relationship between the hourly PVC density and hourly mean HR. Twenty-four-hour Holter electrocardiograms were performed before and 1 to 3 months after the initiation of therapy.There were no significant between-group differences in the baseline characteristics. Both the TB (from 14.6 [9.9-19.2] to 7.6 [1.7-15.8]%, P < 0.001) and OB (from 13.2 [7.6-21.9] to 4.6 [0.5-17.0]%, P = 0.0041) significantly decreased the PVC density, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.73). Compared to OB, the TB had similar effects in reducing the PVC density for P-PVCs (P = 0.96), and NP-PVCs (P = 0.71). The TB significantly decreased the P-PVC density from baseline not only during day-time (P < 0.001) but also night-time (P = 0.0017), while the OB did not significantly decrease the P-PVC density from baseline during night-time (P = 0.17).Compared to OB, the TB could be used with the same efficacy of reducing idiopathic PVCs. The TB may be a more useful therapeutic agent than OB for P-PVCs during a 24-hour period.

Bisoprolol transdermal patch for perioperative care of non-cardiac surgery in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy

Background

Non-cardiac surgery for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is considered to require meticulous perioperative care. β-blockers are considered the first-line drugs for patients with HOCM, and they play a key role in preventing cardiovascular complications in perioperative care. The bisoprolol transdermal patch has recently become available in Japan, and it is useful for patients who are unable to take oral medication during perioperative care. The aim of this case series was to assess the hemodynamic features of patients with HOCM who used the bisoprolol transdermal patch during perioperative care for non-cardiac surgery.

Methods

Between August 2016 and August 2018, we retrospectively analyzed 10 consecutive cases of HOCM with the patients using the bisoprolol transdermal patch during perioperative care. Hemodynamic and echocardiographic features were evaluated before and after patients were switched from oral bisoprolol to transdermal patch therapy or started transdermal patch therapy as a new β-blocker medication. In addition, cardiovascular complications (all-cause death, cardiac death, heart failure, ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation) during the perioperative period were evaluated.

Results

There was no significant change in the patients’ heart rate, blood pressure, ejection fraction, and pressure gradient in the left ventricle after switching from oral bisoprolol to the transdermal patch therapy. On the other hand, patients who started using the bisoprolol transdermal patch as a new ß-blocker medication tended to have a decreased heart rate and pressure gradient thereafter, but there was no significant difference in blood pressure or ejection fraction. No cardiovascular complications occurred during the perioperative period.

Conclusions

We described the utilization of the bisoprolol transdermal patch during perioperative care for non-cardiac surgery in patients with HOCM. We determined that the hemodynamic features of these patients did not change significantly after switching to patch therapy. Further, initiation of the bisoprolol transdermal patch as a new ß-blocker medication sufficiently tended to decrease the pressure gradient. This unique approach can be an alternate treatment option for HOCM.

Trial registration

The registry was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000036703). The date of registration was 10/5/2019 and it was “Retrospectively registered”.

Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in transdermal β-blocker patch users is lower than that in oral β-blocker users after cardiac and/or thoracic aortic surgery

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after open heart surgery is associated with a high risk of mortality and morbidity. Although oral β-blockers are usually recommended to prevent POAF, the efficacy of a transdermal β-blocker patch in preventing POAF is unclear. We compared the incidence of POAF between users of oral and transdermal bisoprolol.

METHODS

We investigated 108 patients who underwent cardiac and/or thoracic aortic surgery between April 2016 and February 2018. We compared perioperative clinical and hemodynamic variables between 49 patients treated with a transdermal bisoprolol patch and 59 patients treated with an oral bisoprolol fumarate.

RESULTS

POAF occurred in 24% of patients in the transdermal and in 46% of patients in the oral bisoprolol groups (p = 0.027). No intergroup difference was observed in in-hospital mortality, perioperative blood pressures and heart rates, and other morbidities. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the use of transdermal bisoprolol was independently associated with a lower rate of POAF (odds ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.84, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

A transdermal bisoprolol patch is an effective and safe β-blocker drug delivery system. The incidence of POAF in this group was lower than that in users of oral bisoprolol.