The role of thiopurine metabolites in inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatological disorders

Predictive role of ITPA genetic variants in thiopurine-related myelotoxicity in Crohn's disease patients

Thiopurines, an effective therapy for Crohn's disease (CD), often lead to adverse events (AEs). Gene polymorphisms affecting thiopurine metabolism may predict AEs. This retrospective study in CD patients (n = 114) with TPMT activity > 5 Units/Red Blood Cells analyzed TPMT (c.238 G > C, c.460 G > A, c.719 A > G), ITPA (c.94 C > A, IVS2 + 21 A > C), and NUDT15 (c.415 C > T) polymorphisms. All patients received azathioprine (median dose 2.2 mg/kg) with 41.2% experiencing AEs, mainly myelotoxicity (28.1%). No NUDT15 polymorphisms were found, 7% had TPMT, and 31.6% had ITPA polymorphisms. AEs led to therapy modifications in 41.2% of patients. Multivariate analysis identified advanced age (OR 1.046, p = 0.007) and ITPA IVS2 + 21 A > C (OR 3.622, p = 0.015) as independent predictors of AEs. IVS2 + 21 A > C was also associated with myelotoxicity (OR 2.863, p = 0.021). These findings suggest that ITPA IVS2 + 21 A > C polymorphism and advanced age predict AEs during thiopurine therapy for CD with intermediate-normal TPMT activity.

Towards personalized treatment in atopic dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

For many years, oral immunosuppressive drugs such as cyclosporine A, azathioprine, mycophenolic acid, and methotrexate were the only treatment options, in addition to topical treatment, in patients with severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-4 receptor alpha, is the first antibody-based treatment commercially available for the treatment of AD. In the near future, more antibody-based treatments and small molecules will become available in the treatment of severe AD.

AREAS COVERED

This review gives an overview of current and future therapies for severe AD, outlines options to optimize treatment with oral immunosuppressive drugs and gives an insight into the future of personalized treatment in AD.

EXPERT OPINION

Due to the heterogeneous character of AD, it is unlikely that all patients will respond equally to these newly tested drugs. We believe that biomarkers will lead to better identification of patients that will benefit from these highly specific, but expensive new treatments. In addition to a role for biomarkers in new treatments, the use of pharmacogenomic biomarkers can improve the efficacy of currently used oral immunosuppressive drugs in AD, which will still be needed for the treatment of moderate to severe AD in the coming years.

Translating translation into patient benefit for atopic eczema

This review considers, in the context of British Skin Foundation (BSF)-funded translational research into atopic eczema conducted in Newcastle, the complex interactions between clinical and non-clinical scientists in both academia and industry and how this may have impacted on clinical care. However, research in individual centres does not occur in isolation and clinically relevant outcomes from collaborative research are increasingly supported through regional and national networks. This is illustrated by our trial of azathioprine in adults with atopic eczema conducted across centres in the North East of England that employed pharmacogenetic dosimetry. Correspondingly the formation of a UK Translational Network for Translational Research in Dermatology (UK TREND) has facilitated the development of a UK-wide network to support atopic eczema projects based on an e-Delphi prioritisation exercise.

Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Low-dose Azathioprine and Allopurinol Cotherapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Large Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Low-dose azathioprine with allopurinol (LDAA) has been proposed as a potent therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with the benefit of overcoming side effects regularly associated with thiopurine monotherapy and poor responses. Concerns regarding safety remain, while a layer of complexity has been added by the trend toward treatment directed by red cell thioguanine nucleotide (TGN) profiling. We report on the clinical efficacy and safety of LDAA use in IBD undirected by metabolite profiling.

METHODS

Observational study of clinical practice from a single IBD center. Patient outcomes were defined clinically based on established activity scores and corticosteroid withdrawal. Red cell TGN was monitored only for suspected nonadherence.

RESULTS

Overall, 113/164 (69%) patients with Crohn's disease and 83/136 (61%) patients with ulcerative/unclassified colitis had a clinical response by the end of follow-up (median 19 months), while 85 (52%) patients with Crohn's disease and 74 (54%) patients with ulcerative/unclassified colitis were in clinical remission. Clinical response was seen in 45/57 (79%) patients with Crohn's disease and 34/53 (64%) patients with ulcerative/unclassified colitis who were thiopurine naive, had active IBD, and received LDAA as the first line immunomodulator, while in 35 (61%) and 28 (53%), respectively, remission was achieved. LDAA was stopped in 20/300 (7%) patients because of side effects, all of which resolved on drug cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest cohort supporting the favorable safety profile and high efficacy of LDAA in IBD. It presents 2 advances in therapy: prescribing LDAA for thiopurine-naive patients, and bypassing TGN monitoring in favor of clinical monitoring (blood counts, etc.), which will make it more accessible for clinics without access to TGN assays.

The Impact of Azathioprine-Associated Lymphopenia on the Onset of Opportunistic Infections in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background

Thiopurines are known to cause lymphopenia (<1,500 lymphocytes/μl). As severe lymphopenia (<500C/μl) is associated with opportunistic infections, we investigated severity of thiopurine-related lymphopenia and development of opportunistic infections in our tertiary referral centre.

Methods

We retrospectively screened medical records of 1,070 IBD patients and identified 100 individuals that developed a total of 161 episodes of lymphopenia during thiopurine treatment between 2002 and 2014. Occurrence of opportunistic infections was documented. A control group consisted of IBD patients receiving thiopurines but without developing lymphopenia.

Results

Of a total of 161 episodes of lymphopenia, 23% were severe (<500C/μl). In this subgroup, thiopurine dosing was modified in 64% (dosage reduction: 32%, medication discontinued: 32%). We identified 9 cases (5.5%) of opportunistic infections, of which only two occurred during severe lymphopenia. One opportunistic infection (4.5%) was identified in the control group. No association was found between opportunistic infections and severity of lymphopenia. All patients who suffered from opportunistic infections were receiving additional immunosuppressive medication.

Conclusion

Our patients treated with thiopurines rarely developed severe lymphopenia and opportunistic infections did not occur more often than in the control group. A careful monitoring of lymphocytes and prophylactic adjustment of thiopurine therapy might contribute to this low incidence.

WITHDRAWN: Reply

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.03.013. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.

Characteristics of azathioprine use and cessation in a longitudinal lupus cohort

Objective

Guidelines for azathioprine (AZA) use in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), including indications for initiation and cessation, are lacking. Clinical decision-making could be improved if reasons for cessation of AZA treatment were standardised.

Methods

We determined the characteristics of AZA use in a cohort of patients with SLE and evaluated reasons for AZA cessation. Patients with SLE in a single centre had longitudinal recording of disease activity (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI)-2k), laboratory investigations and treatment from 2007 to 2012.

Results

Of 183 patients studied, 67 used AZA on at least one occasion. There was no significant difference between AZA users and non-users in age or American College of Rheumatology criteria. Compared with those not treated with AZA, patients treated with AZA had higher disease activity (time-adjusted mean SLEDAI 5.2±0.3 vs 3.8±0.3, p=0.0028) and damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)-SDI 1.6±0.3 vs 1.2±0.1, p=0.0445), and were more likely to have a positive dsDNA (p=0.0130) and receive glucocorticoids (p<0.0001). AZA therapy was ceased in 30/67 (45%) patients. The predominant reasons for cessation were treatment de-escalation 14 (47%), treatment failure 12 (40%) and toxicity 3 (10%). AZA was switched to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in 9/12 (75%) of treatment failures, and this choice was strongly associated with active lupus nephritis.

Conclusions

AZA toxicity was uncommon, and many patients ceased therapy in the context of treatment de-escalation. However, the frequent development of active lupus nephritis requiring MMF suggests the need to distinguish refractoriness, under-treatment and non-adherence to AZA in patients with SLE. These findings suggest that future studies of AZA metabolite measurement could prove valuable in the management of SLE.

Nucleoside transporter proteins as biomarkers of drug responsiveness and drug targets

Nucleoside and nucleobase analogs are currently used in the treatment of solid tumors, lymphoproliferative diseases, viral infections such as hepatitis and AIDS, and some inflammatory diseases such as Crohn. Two gene families are implicated in the uptake of nucleosides and nucleoside analogs into cells, SCL28 and SLC29. The former encodes hCNT1, hCNT2, and hCNT3 proteins. They translocate nucleosides in a Na⁺ coupled manner with high affinity and some substrate selectivity, being hCNT1 and hCNT2 pyrimidine- and purine-preferring, respectively, and hCNT3 a broad selectivity transporter. SLC29 genes encode four members, being hENT1 and hENT2 the only two which are unequivocally implicated in the translocation of nucleosides and nucleobases (the latter mostly via hENT2) at the cell plasma membrane. Some nucleoside-derived drugs can also interact with and be translocated by members of the SLC22 gene family, particularly hOCT and hOAT proteins. Inter-individual differences in transporter function and perhaps, more importantly, altered expression associated with the disease itself might modulate the transporter profile of target cells, thereby determining drug bioavailability and action. Drug transporter pharmacology has been periodically reviewed. Thus, with this contribution we aim at providing a state-of-the-art overview of the clinical evidence generated so far supporting the concept that these membrane proteins can indeed be biomarkers suitable for diagnosis and/or prognosis. Last but not least, some of these transporter proteins can also be envisaged as drug targets, as long as they can show “transceptor” functions, in some cases related to their role as modulators of extracellular adenosine levels, thereby providing a functional link between P1 receptors and transporters.