Arthroscopic guided synovial biopsy in rheumatology: current perspectives

Title Current Status of the Search for Biomarkers for Optimal Therapeutic Drug Selection for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by destructive synovitis. It is significantly associated with disability, impaired quality of life, and premature mortality. Recently, the development of biological agents (including tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors) and Janus kinase inhibitors have advanced the treatment of RA; however, it is still difficult to predict which drug will be effective for each patient. To break away from the current therapeutic approaches that could be described as a “lottery,” there is an urgent need to establish biomarkers that stratify patients in terms of expected therapeutic responsiveness. This review deals with recent progress from multi-faceted analyses of the synovial tissue in RA, which is now bringing new insights into diverse features at both the cellular and molecular levels and their potential links with particular clinical phenotypes.

Arthroscopy in rheumatology: where have we been? Where might we go?

The aim of our manuscript is to illustrate the past, present and future role of rheumatologists performing arthroscopy. Doctors first began adapting endoscopes to inspect joints to assess synovial conditions that concern rheumatologists. Rheumatologists were among the pioneers developing arthroscopy. Students of the father of modern arthroscopy, Watanabe, included rheumatologists, who taught others once home. Rheumatologists assessed the intra-articular features of their common diseases in the 60s and 70s. Improvements in instrumentation and efforts by a few orthopaedists adapted a number of common joint surgical procedures for arthroscopy. Interest from rheumatologists in arthroscopy grew in the 90s with ‘needle scopes’ used in an office setting. Rheumatologists conducting the first prospective questioning arthroscopic debridement in OA and developing biological compounds reduced the call for arthroscopic interventions. The arthroscope has proven an excellent tool for viewing and sampling synovium, which continues to at several international centres. Some OA features—such as calcinosis—beg further arthroscopic investigation. A new generation of ‘needle scopes’ with far superior optics awaits future investigators.

Multimodal VEGF-Targeted Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging of Rats with Inflammatory Arthritis: Using Dye-VEGF-Antibody-Loaded Microbubbles

Owing to the heavy health burdens from rheumatoid arthritis, a sensitive and objective imaging method is needed for early diagnosis and accurate evaluation of the disease. We aimed to fabricate vascular epithelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted microbubbles (MBs) to evaluate the expression levels of VEGF within the inflammatory lesions of rats with adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) using a multimodal photoacoustic (PA)/ultrasound (US) imaging system. Fluorescein isothiocyanate-biotin double-labeled vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 antibodies and Cy5.5-biotin double-labeled VEGF2 antibodies were added to the avidin-labeled MBs to synthesize VEGF-targeted MBs. The antibodies could specifically bind to the MBs according to the flow cytometry and fluorescence imaging. In vitro experiments on the cellular uptake of the target MBs also validated the interaction of the VEGF antibodies and the MBs. Multimodal contrast-enhanced US (CEUS)/PA imaging was performed in sequence on the inflamed paws of the AIA rats with a single PA/US imaging system after the injection of the targeted MBs. The CEUS and PA signals were then quantified and verified by the pathologic results. A CEUS pattern of fast wash in and slow washout was observed in the AIA rats after injection of targeted MBs. Compared with AIA rats injected with unconnected VEGF antibodies and naked MBs, AIA rats injected with targeted MBs presented a higher peak intensity (p = 0.0079 and 0.0079 respectively) and a longer time to peak (p = 0.0117 and 0.0117, respectively). The PA signals were also significantly enhanced after injection of targeted MBs (p = 0.0112 and 0.0119, respectively), which was in accordance with the pathologic and immunohistochemical results. In conclusion, VEGF-targeted MBs can be used as agents for multimodal CEUS/PA imaging and to detect VEGF expression in the inflammatory lesions of AIA rats in vivo. This strategy may be useful in imaging evaluation of arthritis by identifying inflammation-related molecules in different imaging modes.

Synovial Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Crystal-Associated Arthropathies

BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE

This study seeks to assess the utility of synovial biopsy in the diagnosis of crystal-associated arthropathies (CAAs) in a clinical setting.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we reviewed biopsy reports involving synovial tissue between 1988 and 2015. We then reviewed the records of patients where the biopsy was performed for a clinical suspicion of CAA-the clinical group-and calculated the frequency of a positive diagnosis. The t test, Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test, and Fisher test were used to compare clinical characteristics of patients with and without a tissue diagnosis of CAA. We also reviewed cases of unexpected detection of crystalline disease involving synovial tissue-the incidental group.

RESULTS

Among 2786 biopsies involving the synovium, we identified 65 cases in the clinical group and 33 cases in the incidental group. In the clinical group, a relevant diagnosis was obtained from synovial tissue in 36.9%, and a CAA was diagnosed in 20%. Restricting analysis to clinical biopsies performed for a primary suspicion of CAA, a relevant diagnosis was obtained in 61.3%, and a CAA was diagnosed in 38.7%. The incidental group comprised 1.2% of all synovial biopsies and included 7 mass lesions. Basic calcium phosphate was not reported on any biopsy in the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Synovial biopsy is a diagnostic option when suspected CAA is resistant to conventional modes of diagnosis. Crystalline diseases should be considered in the differential diagnosis of musculoskeletal mass lesions mimicking neoplasms.

Synovial biopsies in inflammatory arthritis: precision medicine in rheumatoid arthritis

Introduction: Synovial tissue (ST) is composed of a lining and sublining layer and is the target tissue involved in the inflammatory arthritides (IA), in which there is lining layer hyperplasia, inflammatory cell influx, macrophage recruitment and change in number and behavior of lining fibroblasts. Understanding synovial pathology has been critical in providing insights into pathogenetic mechanisms of disease and therapeutics. Pathobiological insights into ST have been underpinned by progress in molecular analytic methods; research in this area holds promise in individualizing treatment and optimizing response.Areas covered: We explore ST in IA and cover in-depth the utility of synovial biopsy and ST heterogeneity. We review recent advances in ST research and discuss implications with regards to therapeutic response. Finally, we provide perspectives on the identification of new drug targets and new diagnostic and prognostic markers.Expert opinion: ST holds the potential to individualize therapy by detecting biomarkers of diagnosis, therapeutic choice, and treatment modification in IA. Advances in molecular biology including high-throughput omics are likely to provide information that has hitherto remained unknown. ST analyzes pre- and post-treatment needs to be standard of care; only by routinely collecting and analyzing ST will we achieve the precision medicine outcomes described herein.

Patient-reported outcomes and safety in patients undergoing synovial biopsy: comparison of ultrasound-guided needle biopsy, ultrasound-guided portal and forceps and arthroscopic-guided synovial biopsy techniques in five centres across Europe

Background

We present a European multicenter study, comparing safety data and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) from patients undergoing synovial biopsy using ultrasound-guided needle biopsy (US-NB), ultrasound-guided portal and forceps (US-P&F) or arthroscopic-guided (AG) procedures.

Objectives

To describe safety and PRO data on joint indices of pain, stiffness and swelling before and after biopsy, procedural discomfort, joint status compared with before biopsy and willingness to undergo a second biopsy for each technique and compare the three techniques. To evaluate the impact on PRO and safety data of corticosteroid therapy as part of the biopsy procedure and sequential biopsy procedures.

Methods

Data were collected on the day of biopsy and 7-14 days postprocedure. Joint pain, swelling and stiffness indices were recorded as 0-100  mm Visual Analogue Scale; qualitative outcome variables on five-point Likert scales. Groups were compared with linear regression, adjusting for disease activity, corticosteroid therapy and prebiopsy PRO value and accounting for repeated measurements.

Results

A total of 524 synovial biopsy procedures were documented (402 US-NB, 65 US-P&F and 57 AGSB). There were eight adverse events (1.5%) with no difference between biopsy methods (p=0.55). All PROs were improved 2  weeks postprocedure, and there were no differences in postbiopsy change in PROs between biopsy methods. Corticosteroid administration, whether intramuscular (n=62) or intra-articular (n=38), did not result in more adverse events (p=0.81) and was associated with reduction in postbiopsy swelling (p<0.01). Sequential biopsy procedures (n=103 patients) did not result in more adverse events (p=0.61) or worsening in PRO data.

Conclusion

Overall, our results do not suggest a significant difference in safety or patient tolerability between US-NB, US-P&F and AGSB sampling. Further, corticosteroid therapy as part of the biopsy procedure and sequential biopsies is safe and well tolerated in patients.