Prevalence and risk factors of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease in East Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The interplay between rheumatic diseases and pulmonary health

Patients with rheumatic diseases (RDs) are prone to a number of comorbidities, particularly those affecting the respiratory system due to inflammatory and autoimmune mechanisms. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and inflammatory idiopathic myopathies (IIMs) often present with progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD). The prevalence of ILD varies among patients with RDs, with 11% in RA, 47% in SSc, and 41% in IIMs. Some diagnostic markers, including KL-6, cytokines TNF-α and IL-6, and autoantibodies (anti-CCP), play a crucial role in assessing and predicting the course of pulmonary involvement in RDs. Lung fibrosis is a progressive disorder in SSc and RA, limiting the effiency of therapeutic interventions. Re-evaluating treatment approaches with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is crucial for understanding their impact on the risk of lung affections. Despite initial concerns surrounding methotrexate, recent evidence points to its benefits in RA-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). Recognizing the intricate relationship between autoimmune RDs and lung affections is crucial for formulating effective treatment strategies. Emphasis is placed on collaborative efforts of rheumatologists and pulmonologists for early diagnosis, comprehensive care, and optimal patient outcomes in RA-ILD.

Macrophages as determinants and regulators of systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the primary cause of mortality in systemic sclerosis (SSc), an autoimmune disease characterized by tissue fibrosis. SSc-related ILD (SSc-ILD) occurs more frequently in females aged 30-55 years, whereas idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is more prevalent in males aged 60-75 years. SSc-ILD occurs earlier than IPF and progresses rapidly. FCN1, FABP4, and SPP1 macrophages are involved in the pathogenesis of lung fibrosis; SPP1 macrophages demonstrate upregulated expression in both SSc-ILD and IPF. To identify the differences between SSc-ILD and IPF using single-cell analysis, clarify their distinct pathogeneses, and propose directions for prevention and treatment.

METHODS

We performed single-cell RNA sequencing on NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases GSE159354 and GSE212109, and analyzed lung tissue samples across healthy controls, IPF, and SSc-ILD. The primary measures were the filtered genes integrated with batch correction and annotated cell types for distinguishing patients with SSc-ILD from healthy controls. We proposed an SSc-ILD pathogenesis using cell-cell interaction inferences, and predicted transcription factors regulating target genes using SCENIC. Drug target prediction of the TF gene was performed using Drug Bank Online.

RESULTS

A subset of macrophages activates the MAPK signaling pathway under oxidative stress. Owing to the lack of inhibitory feedback from ANNEXIN and the autoimmune characteristics, this leads to an earlier onset of lung fibrosis compared to IPF. During initial lung injury, fibroblasts begin to activate the IL6 pathway under the influence of SPP1 alveolar macrophages, but IL6 appears unrelated to other inflammatory and immune cells. This may explain why tocilizumab (an anti-IL6-receptor antibody) only preserves lung function in patients with early SSc-ILD. Finally, we identified BCLAF1 and NFE2L2 as influencers of MAPK activation in macrophages. Metformin downregulates NFE2L2 and could serve as a repurposed drug candidate.

CONCLUSIONS

SPP1 alveolar macrophages play a role in the profibrotic activity of IPF and SSc-ILD. However, SSc-ILD is influenced by autoimmunity and oxidative stress, leading to the continuous activation of MAPK in macrophages. This may result in an earlier onset of lung fibrosis than in IPF. Such differences could serve as potential research directions for early prevention and treatment.

Characteristics and risk factors of mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterized by dysregulation of fibroblast function, which often involves the lungs. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with SSc (SSc-ILD) is a major cause of death among patients with SSc. Our study aimed to identify risk factors for mortality and compare the clinical characteristics of patients with SSc-ILD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were retrospectively enrolled between 2010 and 2018 in a tertiary hospital in Korea. Patients with SSc-ILD were classified depending on the first pulmonary function test or radiologic findings: extensive (n = 46, >20% disease extent on computed tomography (CT) or forced vital capacity [FVC] < 70% in indeterminate cases) and limited (n = 60, <20% disease extent on CT or FVC ≥70% in indeterminate cases).

RESULTS

Patients in the extensive group were younger (mean age ± SD 49.3 ± 11.5) than those in the limited group (53.9 ± 12.5, p = .067) at diagnosis. The extensive group showed frequent pulmonary hypertension (43.5% vs. 16.7%, p = .009) and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (61.3 ± 33.7 vs. 42.1 ± 26.0, p = .003) and mortality (32.6%, mean duration of follow-up, 100.0 ± 44.7 months vs. 10.0%, 86.0 ± 53.4 months, p = .011). ILD was detected within five years from the first visit (median years 3.5 (1.0, 6.0) vs. 4.5 (0.6, 9.0), survivors vs. non-survivors), and mortality occurred in 19.8% of all patients during a 15-year follow-up. Older age, lower FVC, and initial disease stage (limited or extensive) were associated with mortality, but FVC decline was similar in the limited and extensive groups, such as 15-20% in the first year and 8-10% in the next year, regardless of the initial extent of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 10% of patients with SSc-ILD in the limited and extensive group showed progression. ILD was detected at a median of less than five years from the first visit; therefore, it is necessary to carefully monitor patients' symptoms and signs from an early stage. Long-term surveillance is also required.Key messagesPatients with systemic sclerosis-interstitial lung disease manifested a heterogeneous disease course.Approximately 10% of the patients in the limited group showed progression, which was similar to the proportion of patients in the extensive group.Interstitial lung disease was detected at a median of less than five years from the first visit.

Scleromyositis: A distinct novel entity within the systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis spectrum. Implications for care and pathogenesis

Systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis are both associated with decreased quality of life and increased mortality. Their prognosis and management largely depend on the disease subgroups. Indeed, systemic sclerosis is a heterogeneous disease, the two predominant forms of the disease being limited and diffuse scleroderma. Autoimmune myositis is also a heterogeneous group of myopathies that classically encompass necrotizing myopathy, antisynthetase syndrome, dermatomyositis and inclusion body myositis. Recent data revealed that an additional disease subset, denominated "scleromyositis", should be recognized within both the systemic sclerosis and the autoimmune myositis spectrum. We performed an in-depth review of the literature with the aim of better delineating scleromyositis. Our review highlights that this concept is supported by recent clinical, serological and histopathological findings that have important implications for patient management and understanding of the disease pathophysiology. As compared with other subsets of systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis, scleromyositis patients can present with a characteristic pattern of muscle involvement (i.e. distribution of muscle weakness) along with multisystemic involvement, and some of these extra-muscular complications are associated with poor prognosis. Several autoantibodies have been specifically associated with scleromyositis, but they are not currently integrated in diagnostic and classification criteria for systemic sclerosis and autoimmune myositis. Finally, striking vasculopathic lesions at muscle biopsy have been shown to be hallmarks of scleromyositis, providing a strong anatomopathological substratum for the concept of scleromyositis. These findings bring new insights into the pathogenesis of scleromyositis and help to diagnose this condition, in patients with subtle SSc features and/or no autoantibodies (i.e. "seronegative" scleromyositis). No guidelines are available for the management of these patients, but recent data are showing the way towards a new therapeutic approach dedicated to these patients.

Comparing clinical characteristics of systemic sclerosis with or without interstitial lung disease: A cross-sectional study from a single center of the Chinese Rheumatism Data Center

Background

We aimed to compare the clinical characteristics of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) with or without interstitial lung disease (ILD) to identify relationships with the presence of ILD in SSc at a single center in China.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted using retrospective data from the Chinese Rheumatology Data Center. Patients diagnosed with SSc at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between 2013 and 2022 were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between patients with SSc with and without ILD. Logistic regression analyses were performed to explore these associations.

Results

A total of 227 patients with SSc were included (male:female ratio = 1:4.82), of which 121 (53.3%) were accompanied with ILD. SSc patients with ILD had a higher percentage of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc), sclerodactyly, loss of finger pad, muscle involvement, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), and pulmonary hypertension (PAH), elevated Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), and elevated ferritin than those without ILD, and a higher modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (all P < 0.05). Antinuclear antibody (ANA) and anti-scleroderma-70 (anti-Scl-70) positivity was presented frequently in SSc patients with ILD, while SSc patients without ILD were more often anti-centromere antibody (ACA) positive (all P < 0.05). On the multivariable analysis, muscle involvement [OR 2.551 (95% CI 1.054-6.175), P = 0.038], LVDD [OR 2.360 (95% CI 1.277-4.361), P = 0.006], PAH [OR 9.134 (95% CI 2.335-35.730), P = 0.001], dcSSc [OR 2.859 (95% CI 1.489-5.487), P = 0.002], PLR [OR 1.005 (95% CI 1.001-1.008), P = 0.020], elevated KL-6 [OR 2.033 (95% CI 1.099-3.763), P = 0.024], and anti-Scl-70 [OR 3.101 (95% CI 1.647-5.840), P < 0.001] were statistically significant associations with SSc patients with ILD.

Conclusion

Systemic sclerosis was found mainly in females. Several important differences in clinical and laboratory characteristics have been demonstrated between SSc patients with or without ILD. Muscle involvement, LVDD, PAH, dcSSc, PLR, elevated KL-6, and Anti-Scl-70 antibody may be associated with SSc in patients with ILD.

Systemic sclerosis in Asians: Are there racial differences?

Systemic sclerosis is a multisystemic autoimmune disease characterized by vasculopathy and fibrosis. Racial factors exert a significant influence on the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, antibody profile, mortality and genetic factors in systemic sclerosis. In this review, we examined Asian systemic sclerosis cohorts reported in Asia and multi-racial cohort studies to evaluate the disease characteristics and outcomes of systemic sclerosis in Asians. Asian patients have distinct genetic susceptibility to systemic sclerosis, younger age of systemic sclerosis onset, higher frequency of diffuse skin involvement, different autoantibody profiles such as higher frequency of anti-Scl70 and anti-U1-RNP antibodies, and more severe clinical phenotype. There was a suggestion of poorer survival among Asians that may be contributed by more severe disease, socioeconomic factors and differences in healthcare systems. Recognizing the influence of racial differences in systemic sclerosis disease course is important as it has implications for appropriate treatment, monitoring and prognostication.