Reappraisal of the role of postoperative radiation therapy in patients with pIIIa-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: A propensity score matching analysis

Mediastinal radiotherapy after adjuvant chemotherapy for resected non–small cell lung cancer with N2 lymphadenopathy: A novel meta-analysis

Introduction

Treatment for stage IIIA N2 non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) typically involves a combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery, but the optimal sequencing is not determined. Local recurrence rates following surgery remain high, and the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in N2 disease is unclear. This meta-analysis aims to determine whether PORT provides additional survival advantage beyond observation for patients with stage IIIA N2 disease who have undergone complete surgical resection and received adjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

All studies comparing adjuvant chemotherapy and PORT versus adjuvant chemotherapy alone after curative surgical resection for stage IIIA N2 NSCLC were included. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects modelling in accordance with MOOSE (Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies) guidelines. Subgroup analysis, heterogeneity, and risk of bias were assessed, with meta-regression to determine the effects of patient and tumor characteristics on outcomes.

Results

Ten studies with a pooled dataset of 18,077 patients (5453 PORT, 12,624 no PORT) were included. PORT significantly improved both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 1 year (OS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.768; DFS: HR, 0.733), 3 years (OS: HR, 0.914; DFS: HR, 0.732), and 5 years (OS: HR, 0.898; DFS: HR, 0.735, all P < .0001). These effects were independent of specific patient or tumor characteristics.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates a significant DFS and OS benefit from the addition of PORT following adjuvant chemotherapy. We advocate the consideration of PORT for such patients following specialist multidisciplinary assessment and comprehensive discussion of the benefits and risks of treatment.

Postoperative long-term survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients with skip-N2 metastases

OBJECTIVE

Radical lymphadenectomy is crucial in operations for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Usually pN1 and pN2 lymph nodes are affected consecutively (N1N2). Nevertheless, pN2 metastases may also occur in the absence of pN1 as skip-N2 metastases (N0N2). Here we compare the long-term survival of N1N2- and N0N2 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

464 patients underwent surgery for NSCLC at our institution between 2012 and 2017. We retrospectively reviewed data of pN2 stage patients (n = 68). Patients with N1N2 (n = 39) were compared to N0N2 (n = 29) patients. 1-, 3-and 5-year survival rates were measured. Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and the cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors for overall survival. All patients received adjuvant chemoradiation therapy according to European guidelines.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. We observed no differences in the histology, localization, or gender in our cohort. N0N2 patients showed significantly better 1- (N1N2: 82.4% vs. N0N2 100%; p = 0.001), 3- (14.7% vs. 63.6%; p=<0.001) and 5-year (9.4% vs. 43.8%; p = 0.001) survival rates. Tumor size (Hazard ratio (HR) 1.46, Confidence interval (CI 95%) 1.03-2.04; p = 0.03) and the occurrence of N1N2 (HR 4.26, CI 2.04-8.91; p < 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors for worse long-term survival. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed a reduced overall survival for N1N2 patients (log-rank N1N2, N0N2 p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

N1N2 patients have a significantly worse prognosis compared to N0N2 patients. This will aid to classify the heterogeneous pN2-NSCLC patient population more precisely. Further, multimodal therapy should be considered for N1N2 patients.

Causation between Pathway Completion and Reduced Hospital Stay in Patients with Lung Cancer: a Retrospective Cohort Study Using Propensity Score Matching

We have previously demonstrated that clinical pathway completion helps reduce hospital stays. However, our previous results showed only a correlation, not causation. Therefore, the current study’s aim was to analyze the causation between clinical pathway completion and reduced hospital stays for patients with lung cancer. Data were collected from April 2013 to March 2018 from the electronic medical records of the University of Miyazaki Hospital. We used propensity score matching to extract records from 227 patients. Patients were further divided into a pathway completed group and a pathway not completed group; 74 patients in each group were available for data analysis. Our main analysis involved estimating the discharge curve, which was comprised of the in-hospital rate and hospital stay. Additional analyzes were performed to compare the frequency of medical treatments registered in the clinical pathway but not implemented (termed deviated medical treatments). The occurrence of these treatments meant that the clinical pathway was not completed. The main results indicated a decrease in the in-hospital rate of the completion group, compared with the not completed group. The p value of the log-rank test was <0.001 for total patients and patients who underwent resection, and 0.017 for patients who did not undergo resection. Additional results indicated that a number of intravenous drips were not implemented, despite their registration on clinical pathways. Our results indicate that clinical pathway completion contributes to improved efficiency and safety. This simplified procedure is expected to be applicable to other diseases and clinical indicators.

The role of postoperative radiotherapy for completely resected pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer patients with different clinicopathological features: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Background: The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in completely resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 (pIIIA-N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of PORT in patients with pIIIA-N2 NSCLC on the basis of clinicopathological features. Methods: The PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), which were compared using the hazard ratio (HR). Results: One randomized trial and 12 retrospective studies were eligible for the analysis. PORT significantly improved both OS [HR = 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-0.92] and DFS (HR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.38-0.85) compared with non-PORT treatment in patients with multiple N2 metastases or multiple N2 station involvement. No significant difference in either OS (HR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.86-1.24) or DFS (HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.70-1.65) was found between PORT and non-PORT groups for patients with single N2 station involvement. No significant heterogeneity was observed. No significant differences in OS were observed between PORT and non-PORT groups for patients of different ages, sex, tumor sizes or pT stages, and histological types. Conclusions: The findings of this meta-analysis supported a role for PORT in patients with completely resected pIIIA-N2 NSCLC having multiple N2 metastases and favored withholding PORT to patients with single N2 station involvement. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the findings.

Does the addition of postoperative radiotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy offer any benefit in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and mediastinal lymphadenopathy?

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether the addition of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) to adjuvant chemotherapy offers any benefit in patients undergoing curative resection for non-small cell lung cancer found to harbour mediastinal lymphadenopathy. A total of 77 papers were identified using the reported search, of which 11 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. Only studies reporting on survival data of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with and without PORT were included in this analysis. The authors, date, journal, country, study type, population, outcomes and key results are tabulated. Six studies reported a statistically significant positive impact of PORT on long-term or disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.048-0.0001). Five more studies found no difference in terms of survival between patients receiving and not receiving PORT. Among the 11 studies, only two were randomized controlled, with one of them reporting improved disease-free (P = 0.041) but not overall survival (P = 0.073), while the other finding no difference in survival. Furthermore, three more studies reported on DFS and/or locoregional recurrence of the disease. One of these studies reported a significantly improved DFS among patients receiving PORT (P = 0.003), while two of them reported a reduced rate of locoregional recurrence in this group (P = 0.032-0.009). Many studies report a positive effect of PORT when combined in parallel or sequentially with adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of long-term, disease free survival or locoregional control of the disease in patients who have undergone surgical resection of NSCLC and are found to harbour N2 disease. However, these reports are counterbalanced by an almost equal number of studies which show no difference between PORT and no PORT. Only one study reported significantly increased radiation related adverse effects in patients undergoing chemotherapy and PORT.