Validation of CPS+EG, Neo-Bioscore, and modified Neo-Bioscore staging systems after preoperative systemic therapy of breast cancer: Protocol of a retrospective multicenter cohort study in China

Circulating microRNAs as indicators in the prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in luminal B breast cancer

PURPOSE

Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have been indicated as predictive biomarker for the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the prognosis of breast cancer (BC); however, to date the conclusions have been controversial. The biological characteristics of BC were affected by molecular subtypes. Hence, we aimed to investigate the predictive effect of miRNAs on NAC response in luminal B BC patients.

METHODS

Thirty-seven luminal B BC patient under NAC were prospectively enrolled in this study. Based on their clinical, pathological, and comprehensive response, the patients were defined as responder or non-responders, respectively. Circulating miRNAs were isolated from blood samples before and at the middle of NAC, and candidate miRNAs (miR-34a-5p, miR-125b-5p, miR-210, miR-222, miR-375, miR-718, miR-4516, and let-7g) were analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In addition, the association between miRNAs and disease-free survival (DFS) was examined.

RESULTS

miR-718, miR-4516, miR-210, and miR-125b-5p were found to be specific miRNAs associated with chemo-sensitivity of luminal B HER2 negative patients (n = 24). In the luminal B HER2 positive cohort (n = 13), dynamics of miR-222 and let-7g correlated with pathological response. Treatment-induced increase in miR-34a-5p in the responders except who reached pathologic complete response (pCR) was consistently identified across all luminal B patients and its two subgroups. Finally, after adjustments for Neo-Bioscore, patients with increased levels of miR-125b-5p during NAC had a worse DFS than those with decreased levels (HR = 5.86, 95% CI = 1.39-24.62, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Specific circulating miRNAs were identified as predictive markers for NAC response and prognosis in luminal B BC. The underlying mechanism needs further studies.

Assessment of CPS + EG, Neo-Bioscore and Modified Neo-Bioscore in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Preoperative Systemic Therapy: A Multicenter Cohort Study

This study was to assess the prognosis stratification of the clinical-pathologic staging system incorporating estrogen receptor (ER)-negative disease, the nuclear grade 3 tumor pathology (CPS + EG), Neo-Bioscore, and a modified Neo-Bioscore system in breast cancer patients after preoperative systemic therapy (PST). A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted from 12 participating hospitals' databases from 2006 to 2015. Five-year disease free survival (DFS), disease specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier Method. Area under the curve (AUC) of the three staging systems was compared. Wald test and maximum likelihood estimates in Cox proportional hazards model were used for multivariate analysis. A total of 1,077 patients were enrolled. The CPS + EG, Neo-Bioscore, and modified Neo-Bioscore could all stratify the DFS, DSS, and OS (all P < 0.001). While in the same stratum of Neo-Bioscore scores 2 and 3, the HER2-positive patients without trastuzumab therapy had much poorer DSS (P = 0.013 and P values < 0.01, respectively) as compared to HER2-positive patients with trastuzumab therapy and HER2-negative patients. Only the modified Neo-Bioscore had a significantly higher stratification of 5-year DSS than PS (AUC 0.79 vs. 0.65, P = 0.03). So, the modified Neo-Bioscore could circumvent the limitation of CPS + EG or Neo-Bioscore.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03437837.

Comparison of the performance of four staging systems in determining the prognosis of breast cancer among women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Different tumor-related factors have been proposed to assess the risk of disease progression and death in women undergoing neoadjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy. Recently, besides the classical pre-treatment clinical stage (CS) and post-treatment pathologic stage (PS), estrogen receptor status and histologic grade (CPS + EG score) and HER2 results (Neo-Bioscore) have also been added to this suite of staging systems, generating new scores. The present study aims to compare the performance of these four staging systems, namely CS, PS, CPS + EG and Neo-Bioscore, in the prognosis of breast cancer in women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

This study comprises a retrospective cohort study of female breast cancer patients diagnosed at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Brazil from January 2013 to December 2015. A descriptive analysis of patient characteristics was conducted, and Kaplan-Meier curves, a Cox proportional hazard analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were developed according to the assessed staging system scores.

RESULTS

A total of 803 patients were eligible for this study. Most were under 65 years old (88.0%), presented advanced tumors (clinical stage ≥ IIB 77.1%), with positive estrogen receptor (71.2%) and negative HER2 (75.7%) results. During the follow-up, 172 patients (21.4%) evolved to death. A statistical difference (p < 0.001) was observed between 5 year disease-free survival and 5 year overall survival rates according to the PS, CPS + EG and Neo-Bioscore staging systems.

CONCLUSION

The PS, CPS + EG and Neo-Bioscore staging systems were proven to be equivalent to predict the prognosis of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.