Video-assisted thoracic surgery is an optimal alternative to conventional thoracotomy for reoperations for ipsilateral pulmonary lesions

Comparison of early recurrence in young-onset primary spontaneous pneumothorax following surgery using different covering methods

OBJECTIVES

The treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax not only involves bulla resection via video-assisted thoracic surgery but also covers the lesion. Ideal treatment should minimize adhesions and reduce the recurrence rate. This study aimed to explore different covering methods and compare the frequency of early recurrence for each covering method.

METHODS

We included 370 subjects with primary spontaneous pneumothorax < 25 years who were treated with video-assisted thoracic surgery from August 2012 to December 2022. Subjects were divided into three groups depending on how the treated lesions were covered. The P group included 162 subjects treated between April 2012 and June 2017 whose lesions were covered using polyglycolic acid sheets on the staple line of the bulla resection lesion. The O group included 93 subjects treated between July 2017 and July 2019 whose lesions were covered with oxidized regenerated cellulose over a polyglycolic acid sheet. The N group included 115 subjects treated between August 2019 and December 2022 whose lesions were covered with oxidized regenerated cellulose over a polyglycolic acid nano sheet.

RESULTS

Recurrence rates were 3.7%, 8.6%, and 6.0% in the P, O, and N groups, respectively; however, the differences were not statistically significant. The adhesions were milder in the N group than in the P and O groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both covering methods were effective in preventing recurrence, further studies involving further treatment modifications and longer-term follow-ups are required.

Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Completion Lobectomy Long after Wedge Resection or Segmentectomy in the Same Lobe: A Bicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Completion lobectomy (CL) following a prior resection in the same lobe may be complicated by severe pleural or hilar adhesions. The role of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) has never been evaluated in this setting.

METHODS

Data were collected from two Italian centers. Between 2015 and 2022, 122 patients (60 men and 62 women, median age 67.7 ± 8.913) underwent U-VATS CL at least 4 weeks after previous lung surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight (22.9%) patients were affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and twenty-five (20.4%) were active smokers. Among the cohort, the initial surgery was performed using U-VATS in 103 (84.4%) patients, triportal-VATS in 8 (6.6%), and thoracotomy in 11 (9.0%). Anatomical segmentectomy was the initial surgery in 46 (37.7%) patients, while hilar lymphadenectomy was performed in 16 (13.1%) cases. CL was performed on 110 (90.2%) patients, segmentectomy on 10 (8.2%), and completion pneumonectomy on 2 (1.6%). Upon reoperation, moderate pleural adhesions were observed in 38 (31.1%) patients, with 2 (1.6%) exhibiting strong adhesions. Moderate hilar adhesions were found in 18 (14.8%) patients and strong adhesions in 11 (9.0%). The median operative time was 203.93 ± 74.4 min. In four (3.3%) patients, PA taping was performed. One patient experienced intraoperative bleeding that did not require conversion to thoracotomy. Conversion to thoracotomy was necessary in three (2.5%) patients. The median postoperative drainage stay and postoperative hospital stay were 5.67 ± 4.44 and 5.52 ± 2.66 days, respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in 34 (27.9%) patients. Thirty-day mortality was null. Histology was the only factor found to negatively influence intraoperative outcomes (p = 0.000). Factors identified as negatively impacting postoperative outcomes at univariate analyses were male sex (p = 0.003), age > 60 years (p = 0.003), COPD (p = 0.014), previous thoracotomy (p = 0.000), previous S2 segmentectomy (p = 0.001), previous S8 segmentectomy (p = 0.008), and interval between operations > 5 weeks (p= 0.005). In multivariate analysis, only COPD confirmed its role as an independent risk factor for postoperative complications (HR: 5.12, 95% CI (1.07-24.50), p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

U-VATS CL seems feasible and safe after wedge resection and anatomical segmentectomy.

Perioperative outcomes in redo VATS for pulmonary ipsilateral malignancy: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

The role of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for oncological major pulmonary resections is now well established; however, the literature within pulmonary re-operations is still limited. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of redo thoracoscopic resections for ipsilateral pulmonary malignancy.

METHODS

Data from patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery at the Unit of Thoracic Surgery of Padua were analyzed, comparing the results between the first and second ipsilateral surgery. The retrospective study included patients who underwent 2 thoracoscopic surgeries for oncological reasons between 2015 and 2022. The variables considered included patients' baseline characteristics, pre, intra, and postoperative data.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 51 patients undergoing ipsilateral thoracoscopic re-operation. The statistical analysis showed that surgical time (95min vs 115min; p = 0.009), the presence of intrapleural adhesions at second surgery (30 % vs 76 %; p < 0.001), overall pleural fluid output (200 vs 560 ml; p = 0.003), time with pleural drainage (2 vs 3 days; p = 0.027), air leaks duration time (p = 0.004) and post-operative day of discharge (3 vs 4 days; p = 0.043) were significantly higher in the re-operation group. No statistical differences were observed between the 2 groups respect to R0 resection rate (90.2 % vs 89.1 %; p=>0.9) and complications (5.8 % vs 15.6 %; p = 0.11). The conversion rate to open surgery was 11.8 %.

CONCLUSION

Although some differences emerged between the first and second intervention, they had minimal impact on the clinical course of the patients. Therefore, thoracoscopic surgery has been shown to be safe and effective in re-operations with satisfying perioperative outcomes. To achieve such results, these procedures should be reserved for experienced surgeons.

Residual middle lobectomy after right upper or lower lobectomy: indications and outcome

OBJECTIVES

Residual middle lobectomy after upper lobectomy and lower lobectomy differs in their indications and perioperative outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the indications and perioperative outcomes of residual middle lobectomy after upper and lower lobectomy.

METHODS

The data of 14 patients who underwent residual middle lobectomy after upper or lower lobectomy between January 1997 and December 2021 were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, six patients underwent residual middle lobectomy after upper lobectomy. The indication was second primary lung cancer in five patients and local recurrence in the hilar lymph node between the middle and lower lobar bronchi in one patient. However, one patient was treated with the R2 operation. The remaining eight patients underwent residual middle lobectomy after lower lobectomy. The indication was second primary lung cancer and bronchopleural fistula or stenosis in two and six patients, respectively. No postoperative 90-day mortality was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Residual middle lobectomy for second lung cancer after upper lobectomy is difficult because of severe hilar adhesions. Simultaneous resection of hilar structures or pulmonary artery and parenchyma might be an option. Residual middle lobectomy could be a treatment option for bronchopleural fistula or stenosis after lower lobectomy.

Feasibility and safety of secondary video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for ipsilateral lung cancer after prior pulmonary resection

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is the preferred treatment for resectable non-small cell lung cancer. The increased survival of patients after a first operation has caused increases in the incidence of locoregional recurrence or second primary lung cancer and a concomitant increase in the number of patients who require secondary surgery. Ipsilateral secondary operation is also commonly practiced, albeit with enhanced difficulty. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the feasibility and safety of VATS for ipsilateral lung cancer after pulmonary resection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ipsilateral secondary VATS in the West China Hospital, Sichuan University from 2012 to 2021 were assessed retrospectively. All included patients had a pulmonary resection. Clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and survival data were collected, with an emphasis on conversion to thoracotomy, postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, and survival. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were enrolled, of which 10 (14.3%) had converted thoracotomy, 17 (24.3%) had postoperative complications, and two (2.9%) had grade III complications. No patient died within 30 days after surgery. High Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and severe pleural adhesion were independent predictors for complications. The median follow-up was 50 months (range: 3-120), and the 5-year overall survival was 78.2%.

CONCLUSION

Secondary VATS for ipsilateral lung cancer for patients who had pulmonary resection was feasible and safe. Strict preoperative evaluation and careful management of pleural adhesion are crucial for the success of the surgery.

Pulmonary completion lobectomy after segmentectomy: An integrated analysis of perioperative outcomes

Background

Completion lobectomy (CL) after anatomical segmentectomy is technically challenging and rarely performed. Here, we aimed to report perioperative outcomes of a single center real‐world CL data.

Methods

Seven patients who underwent CL after segmentectomy were retrospectively evaluated between 2015–2021. Additionally, 34 patients were included in the review based on relevant studies in the literature until March 2022. A total of 41 patients were finally analyzed and classified into groups, according to surgical approach (video‐assisted thoracic surgery [VATS] and thoracotomy; 12 and 29 patients, respectively) or interval‐to‐CL following initial segmentectomy (≤8 weeks [short] and >8 weeks [long]; 11 and 30 patients, respectively).

Results

There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, or complications between the predefined groups. However, a longer operative time was observed in the long interval‐to‐CL group than in the short interval‐to‐CL group (267 vs. 226 min, p = 0.02). The rate of severe hilar adhesions was higher in the thoracotomy versus VATS groups (72 vs. 42%, p = 0.06) and in the long versus short interval‐to‐CL groups (70 vs. 45%, p = 0.15). On multivariable logistic regression analysis of a subgroup (n = 30), completion lobectomy of upper lobes may be associated with severe hilar adhesions (p = 0.02, odds ratio: 13.98; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36–143.71).

Conclusion

Completion lobectomy after segmentectomy can be performed securely by either VATS or thoracotomy. Although the thoracotomy and long interval‐to‐CL groups retained a greater percentage of severe hilar adhesions, the perioperative outcomes were similar to those of VATS and short interval‐to‐CL groups, respectively.

Prediction of preoperative intrathoracic adhesions for ipsilateral reoperations: sliding lung sign

Introduction

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for ipsilateral reoperations is controversial, because after the first surgical intervention, pleural adhesions occur frequently in the thoracic cavity and/or chest wall. This study assessed the usefulness of preoperative ultrasonography to reduce the incidence of lung injury at the time of the initial port insertion during secondary ipsilateral VATS.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective, single-center study. Nine patients who underwent thoracic surgery at Vanvitelli Hospitalfrom September 2019 to February 2022, were scheduled for a second VATS surgeryon ipsilateral lung, because of inconclusive intraoperative histologic examination. All nine patients underwent preoperative ultrasonography to assess the possible presence of pleural adhesions. We evaluated the lung sliding, since the presence of pleural adhesions does not permit to appreciate it.

Statistical analysis

Hard severe adhesions were observed in all nine patients without sliding lung sign (specificity 100%). In this series, the sensitivity, PPV, and NPV of the sliding lung sign were 93%, 100% and 94% respectively.

Results

The presence of the lung respiratory changes can be evaluated as the “sliding lung sign” by chest ultrasonography; we believe that the sliding lung sign might also predict intrathoracic adhesion.

Conclusions

Preoperative detection of pleural adhesions using transthoracic ultrasonography was useful for ipsilateral secondary pulmonary resection patients undergoing VATS. Using preoperative ultrasonography can improve the safety and feasibility of placing the initial port in VATS.

Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Sheets in Postoperative Intrathoracic Adhesions

Adhesiolysis is often necessary in intrathoracic adhesion during ipsilateral repeat lung resection. This procedure has a risk of surgical complications, including unintentional intraoperative damage of the pulmonary vessels or lung parenchyma. We used an oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) sheet to prevent intrathoracic adhesion after lung resection in 55 patients. The sheet was placed on the surface of the resected region and on the lung surface under the wound. No major postoperative complications were observed. Three cases underwent ipsilateral thoracic surgery for the treatment of lung malignancies, and there were no intrathoracic adhesions around the ORC sheet-covered area.

Comparison of sublobar resection and lobectomy for patients with small (≤2cm) second primary non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate whether sublobar resection (SR) is equivalent to lobectomy for small (≤ 2 cm) second primary lung cancer (SPLC).

METHODS

We identified 834 patients with T1aN0M0 SPLC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database during 2000-2016. Overall survival (OS) was compared between lobectomy and SR after propensity-score matching. A total of 228 patients with SPLC were identified from three institutions in China as the validation set.

RESULTS

SR was an independent risk factor for patients with 1 to 2 cm SPLC (SR vs Lob: hazard ratio [HR], 1.593; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.186-2.141; P = .002) but not for patients with SPLC ≤ 1 cm (SR vs Lob: HR, 1.206; 95% CI, 0.790-1.841; P = .385). Subgroup analysis on the SEER data indicated that OS favored lobectomy compared with SR for contralateral SPLC ≤ 2 cm but not for ipsilateral ones (ipsilateral: P = .692; contralateral: P = .030). Our multi-institutional data also revealed that SR was equivalent to lobectomy for patients with ≤2 cm ipsilateral SPLC.

CONCLUSIONS

SR is equivalent to lobectomy for SPLC ≤ 1 cm but not for SPLC > 1 to 2 cm. SR might be recommended for patients with ipsilateral small SPLC considering the difficulty in reoperations.

Perioperative Outcomes of Thoracoscopic Reoperations for Clinical Recurrence of Pulmonary Malignancy

The utility of thoracoscopic lung surgery is well established, however, reoperation for pulmonary resections has not been thoroughly studied. We sought to evaluate patient perioperative outcomes following redo thoracoscopic pulmonary resections for malignancy by comparing first and second ipsilateral operations. We included patients undergoing redo thoracoscopic pulmonary resections for clinically recurrent disease following prior lung resection for malignancy from January 1, 2011 to May 31, 2019. Nonmalignant indications were excluded. We analyzed type of procedure, diagnosis, rate of conversion to open, estimated blood loss, operating time, margin status, length of stay and complications. Forty-one patients met our inclusion criteria. The median age was 68 years (range 13-84) and 20 were women. Redo operations had longer lengths of stay with a trend toward higher rate of conversion to thoracotomy, but other perioperative outcomes were similar. No difference in outcomes was seen when patients were grouped by indication for reoperation (recurrence, multiple primaries, and metastasis) or approach of first operation (VATS vs open). However, patients undergoing an anatomic resection after a prior anatomic resection had more complications, higher blood loss, higher rate of conversions to thoracotomy, significantly longer length of stay and longer operative times than nonanatomic resections. Thoracoscopic reoperation for recurrent, metachronous, or metastatic cancer to the lung is a reasonable approach. However, the surgeon must recognize and counsel patients that in patients undergoing a redo anatomic resection, thoracoscopic reoperations are more difficult with more adverse outcomes.

Postoperative analgesia effects of sulfentanyl plus dexmedetomidine in patients received VATS

Background To evaluate sulfentanyl combined with dexmedetomidine hydrochloride on postoperative analgesia in patients who received video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and its effects on serum norepinephrine (NE), dopamine (DA), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), and prostaglandin (PGE2).

Material and Methods Ninety-nine non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received VATS were included in the study. All the patients received intravenous inhalation compound anesthesia. Of the 99 cases, 49 subjects (control group) received sulfentanyl for patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PICA) and other 50 cases (experiment group) received sulfentanyl combined with dexmedetomidine hydrochloride for PICA after operation of VATS. The analgesic effects of the two groups were evaluated according to Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) and the Bruggrmann Comfort Scale (BCS). The serum pain mediator of NE, DA, 5-HT, and PGE2 were examined and compared between the two groups in the first 24 h post-surgery.

Results The VAS scores for the experiment group were significant lower than that of control group on the time points of 8, 16, and 24 h post-surgery (pall<0.05), and the BCS scores of the experiment group in the time points of 8, 16, and 24 h were significantly higher than that of controls (p<0.05). However, the VAS and BCS scores were not statistical differently in the time point of 1, 2, and 4 h post-surgery (pall>0.05). The mean sulfentanyl dosage was 63.01 ± 5.14 μg and 67.12 ± 6.91 μg for the experiment and control groups respectively with significant statistical difference (p<0.05). The mean analgesic pump pressing times were 4.30 ± 1.31 and 5.31 ± 1.46 for experiment and control groups respectively with significant statistical difference (p<0.05). The serum NE, DA, 5-HT, and PGE2 levels were significantly lower in the experimental group compared to that of control group in the time point of 12 h post-surgery (pall<0.05). The side effects of nausea, vomiting, delirium, rash, and hypotension atrial fibrillation were not statistically different between the two groups (pall>0.05).

Conclusion Patient controlled intravenous analgesia of sulfentanyl combined with dexmedetomidine hydrochloride was effective in reducing the VAS score and serum pain mediators in NSCLC patients who received VAST.

Thoracoscopic completion right lower lobectomy after anteromedial basilar segmentectomy in early-stage lung cancer

This report describes the surgical management of a male patient with early‐stage lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic completion right lower lobectomy after previously undergoing sublobar resection for multifocal ground glass nodules of the lung. Perioperative considerations associated with the management of dense pulmonary hilar adhesions and the techniques used are discussed.