Age- and gender-specific disease distribution and the diagnostic accuracy of CT for resected anterior mediastinal lesions

Development and Validation of Contrast-Enhanced CT-Based Deep Transfer Learning and Combined Clinical-Radiomics Model to Discriminate Thymomas and Thymic Cysts: A Multicenter Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of deep transfer learning (DTL) and clinical-radiomics in differentiating thymoma from thymic cysts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical and imaging data of 196 patients pathologically diagnosed with thymoma and thymic cysts were retrospectively collected from center 1. (training cohort: n = 137; internal validation cohort: n = 59). An independent external validation cohort comprised 68 thymoma and thymic cyst patients from center 2. Region of interest (ROI) delineation was performed on contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography (CT) images, and eight DTL models including Densenet 169, Mobilenet V2, Resnet 101, Resnet 18, Resnet 34, Resnet 50, Vgg 13, Vgg 16 were constructed. Radiomics features were extracted from the ROI on the CT images of thymoma and thymic cyst patients, and feature selection was performed using intra-observer correlation coefficient (ICC), Spearman correlation analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression (LR) were used to select clinical-radiological features. Six machine learning classifiers, including LR, support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), were used to construct Radiomics and Clinico-radiologic models. The selected features from the Radiomics and Clinico-radiologic models were fused to build a Combined model. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the models, respectively. The Delong test was used to compare the AUC between different models. K-means clustering was used to subdivide the lesions of thymomas or thymic cysts into subregions, and traditional radiomics methods were used to extract features and compare the ability of Radiomics and DTL models to reflect intratumoral heterogeneity using correlation analysis.

RESULTS

The Densenet 169 based on DTL performed the best, with AUC of 0.933 (95% CI: 0.875-0.991) in the internal validation cohort and 0.962 (95% CI: 0.923-1.000) in the external validation cohort. The AdaBoost classifier achieved AUC of 0.965 (95% CI: 0.923-1.000) and 0.959 (95% CI: 0.919-1.000) in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively, for the Radiomics model. The LightGBM classifier achieved AUC of 0.805 (95% CI: 0.690-0.920) and 0.839 (95% CI: 0.736-0.943) in the Clinico-radiologic model. The AUC of the Combined model in the internal and external validation cohorts was 0.933 (95% CI: 0.866-1.000) and 0.945 (95% CI: 0.897-0.994), respectively. The results of the Delong test showed that the Radiomics model, DTL model, and Combined model outperformed the Clinico-radiologic model in both internal and external validation cohorts (p-values were 0.002, 0.004, and 0.033 in the internal validation cohort, while in the external validation cohort, the p-values were 0.014, 0.006, and 0.015, respectively). But there was no statistical difference in performance among the three models (all p-values <0.05). Correlation analysis showed that radiomics performed better than DTL in quantifying intratumoral heterogeneity differences between thymoma and thymic cysts.

CONCLUSION

The developed DTL model and the Combined model based on radiomics and clinical-radiologic features achieved excellent diagnostic performance in differentiating thymic cysts from thymoma. They can serve as potential tools to assist clinical decision-making, particularly when endoscopic biopsy carries a high risk.

Development and Validation of a CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram in Patients With Anterior Mediastinal Mass: Individualized Options for Preoperative Patients

Background

To improve the preoperative diagnostic accuracy and reduce the non-therapeutic thymectomy rate, we established a comprehensive predictive nomogram based on radiomics data and computed tomography (CT) features and further explored its potential use in clinical decision-making for anterior mediastinal masses (AMMs).

Methods

A total of 280 patients, including 280 with unenhanced CT (UECT) and 241 with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans, all of whom had undergone thymectomy for AMM with confirmed histopathology, were enrolled in this study. A total of 1,288 radiomics features were extracted from each labeled mass. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model was used to select the optimal radiomics features in the training set to construct the radscore. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to establish a combined clinical radiographic radscore model, and an individualized prediction nomogram was developed.

Results

In the UECT dataset, radscore and the UECT ratio were selected for the nomogram. The combined model achieved higher accuracy (AUC: 0.870) than the clinical model (AUC: 0.752) for the prediction of therapeutic thymectomy probability. In the CECT dataset, the clinical and combined models achieved higher accuracy (AUC: 0.851 and 0.836, respectively) than the radscore model (AUC: 0.618) for the prediction of therapeutic thymectomy probability.

Conclusions

In patients who underwent UECT only, a nomogram integrating the radscore and the UECT ratio achieved good accuracy in predicting therapeutic thymectomy in AMMs. However, the use of radiomics in patients with CECT scans did not improve prediction performance; therefore, a clinical model is recommended.

CT-Based Radiomics Nomogram for Differentiation of Anterior Mediastinal Thymic Cyst From Thymic Epithelial Tumor

Objectives

This study aimed to distinguish preoperatively anterior mediastinal thymic cysts from thymic epithelial tumors via a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics nomogram.

Methods

This study analyzed 74 samples of thymic cysts and 116 samples of thymic epithelial tumors as confirmed by pathology examination that were collected from January 2014 to December 2020. Among the patients, 151 cases (scanned at CT 1) were selected as the training cohort, and 39 cases (scanned at CT 2 and 3) served as the validation cohort. Radiomics features were extracted from pre-contrast CT images. Key features were selected by SelectKBest and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and then used to build a radiomics signature (Rad-score). The radiomics nomogram developed herein via multivariate logistic regression analysis incorporated clinical factors, conventional CT findings, and Rad-score. Its performance in distinguishing the samples of thymic cysts from those of thymic epithelial tumors was assessed via discrimination, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The radiomics nomogram, which incorporated 16 radiomics features and 3 conventional CT findings, including lesion edge, lobulation, and CT value, performed better than Rad-score, conventional CT model, and the clinical judgment by radiologists in distinguishing thymic cysts from thymic epithelial tumors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the nomogram was 0.980 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.963–0.993] in the training cohort and 0.992 (95% CI, 0.969–1.000) in the validation cohort. The calibration curve and the results of DCA indicated that the nomogram has good consistency and valuable clinical utility.

Conclusion

The CT-based radiomics nomogram presented herein may serve as an effective and convenient tool for differentiating thymic cysts from thymic epithelial tumors. Thus, it may aid in clinical decision-making.

Can computed tomography-based radiomics potentially discriminate between anterior mediastinal cysts and type B1 and B2 thymomas?

Background

Anterior mediastinal cysts (AMC) are often misdiagnosed as thymomas and undergo surgical resection, which caused unnecessary treatment and medical resource waste. The purpose of this study is to explore potential possibility of computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics for the diagnosis of AMC and type B1 and B2 thymomas.

Methods

A group of 188 patients with pathologically confirmed AMC (106 cases misdiagnosed as thymomas in CT) and thymomas (82 cases) and underwent routine chest CT from January 2010 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The lesions were manually delineated using ITK-SNAP software, and radiomics features were performed using the artificial intelligence kit (AK) software. A total of 180 tumour texture features were extracted from enhanced CT and unenhanced CT, respectively. The general test, correlation analysis, and LASSO were used to features selection and then the radiomics signature (radscore) was obtained. The combined model including radscore and independent clinical factors was developed. The model performances were evaluated on discrimination, calibration curve.

Results

Two radscore models were constructed from the unenhanced and enhanced phases based on the selected four and three features, respectively. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of the enhanced radscore model were 0.928, 89.3%, and 83.8% in the training dataset and 0.899, 84.6%, and 87.5% in the test dataset (higher than the unenhanced radscore model). The combined model of enhanced CT including radiomics features and independent clinical factors yielded an AUC, sensitivity and specificity of 0.941, 82.1%, and 94.6% in the training dataset and 0.938, 92.3%, and 87.5% in the test dataset (higher than the unenhanced combined model and enhanced radscore model).

Conclusions

The study suggested the possibility that the combined model in enhanced CT provided a potential tool to facilitate the differential diagnosis of AMC and type B1 and B2 thymomas.

Pictorial Review of Mediastinal Masses with an Emphasis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a crucial tool for evaluating mediastinal masses considering that several lesions that appear indeterminate on computed tomography and radiography can be differentiated on MRI. Using a three-compartment model to localize the mass and employing a basic knowledge of MRI, radiologists can easily diagnose mediastinal masses. Here, we review the use of MRI in evaluating mediastinal masses and present the images of various mediastinal masses categorized using the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group's three-compartment classification system. These masses include thymic hyperplasia, thymic cyst, pericardial cyst, thymoma, mediastinal hemangioma, lymphoma, mature teratoma, bronchogenic cyst, esophageal duplication cyst, mediastinal thyroid carcinoma originating from ectopic thyroid tissue, mediastinal liposarcoma, mediastinal pancreatic pseudocyst, neurogenic tumor, meningocele, and plasmacytoma.