The prognostic value of the preoperative albumin to alkaline phosphatase ratio in patients with non-small cell lung cancer after surgery

Clinical role of pretreatment albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio in lung cancer: a meta-analysis

The association between pretreatment albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) and clinicopathological parameters and prognosis in lung cancer is unclear. The study aimed to identify the clinical role of pretreatment AAPR among lung cancer patients. Several databases were searched for relevant studies. The primary outcome and secondary outcome were long-term survival including the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and clinicopathological characteristics, respectively. The hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined. A total of 11 publications involving 10,589 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results manifested that a lower pretreatment AAPR predicted poorer OS (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.59-0.71, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.59-0.78, P < 0.001). Furthermore, subgroup analysis for the OS and PFS based on the pathological type and treatment showed similar results and pretreatment AAPR was significantly associated with worse prognosis. Besides, pretreatment AAPR was significantly associated with male (RR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.13, P < 0.001), poor differentiation (RR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.03-1.73, P = 0.029), advanced T stage (RR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-1.52, P = 0.026), N stage (RR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.15-1.55, P < 0.001) and TNM stage (RR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.223, P < 0.001). Therefore, pretreatment AAPR is significantly related to prognosis and tumor stage in lung cancer and patients with a lower pretreatment AAPR are more likely to experience poor survival and advanced tumor stage.

Preoperative albumin-alkaline phosphatase ratio affects the prognosis of patients undergoing hepatocellular carcinoma surgery

BACKGROUND

The correlation between the preoperative albuminalkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) and the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after radical resection is still not comprehensive.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to observe the correlation between preoperative AAPR and the prognosis of HCC patients after radical resection.

METHODS

We constructed a retrospective cohort study and included 656 HCC patients who underwent radical resection. The patients were grouped after determining an optimum AAPR cut-off value. We used the Cox proportional regression model to assess the correlation between preoperative AAPR and the prognosis of HCC patients after radical resection.

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off value of AAPR for assessing the prognosis of HCC patients after radical resection was 0.52 which was acquired by using X-tile software. Kaplan-Meier analysis curves showed that a low AAPR (⩽ 0.52) had a significantly lower rate of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (P< 0.05). Multiple Cox proportional regression showed that an AAPR > 0.52 was a protective factor for OS (HR = 0.66, 95%CI 0.45-0.97, p= 0.036) and RFS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.92, p= 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative AAPR level was related to the prognosis of HCC patients after radical resection and can be used as a routine preoperative test, which is important for early detection of high-risk patients and taking personalized adjuvant treatment.

Development and validation of a nomogram prediction model based on albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio for predicting the prognosis of gallbladder carcinoma

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is a rare biliary tract cancer with a high recurrence rate and a poor prognosis. Albumin-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) has been demonstrated to be a prognostic predictor for several cancers, but its predictive value for GBC patients remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive role of AAPR in GBC patients and to develop a novel nomogram prediction model for GBC patients. We retrospectively collected data from 80 patients who underwent surgery at the Hospital of 81st Group Army PLA as a training cohort. Data were collected from 70 patients with the same diagnosis who underwent surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University as an external verification cohort. The optimal cut-off value of AAPR was determined using X-tile software. A nomogram for the overall survival (OS) based on multivariate Cox regression analysis was developed and validated using calibration curves, Harrell's concordance index, the receiver operating characteristic curves, and decisive curve analyses. The optimal cut-off value of AAPR was .20. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses demonstrated that BMI (p = .043), R0 resection (p = .001), TNM stage (p = .005), and AAPR (p = .017) were independent risk factors for GBC patients. In terms of consistency, discrimination, and net benefit, the nomogram incorporating these four independent risk factors performed admirably. AAPR is an independent predictor of GBC patients undergoing surgery, and a novel nomogram prediction model based on AAPR showed superior predictive ability.

Prognostic Value of Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio for EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with First-Line EGFR-TKIs: A Large Population-Based Study and Literature Review

Background

Resistance inevitably develops in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after treatment of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). The albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR), a novel index, has been reported to be associated with survival in various cancers. In this study, we explored the prognostic value of AAPR in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs.

Methods

The clinical and pretreatment laboratory data were retrospectively extracted from hospital medical system. The Log-rank and Kaplan–Meier analyses were adopted to detect differences in survival between groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox’s proportional hazard regression models were applied to assess the prognostic value of AAPR for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Totally, 598 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with stage IIIB-IV were enrolled into this study. The median age of all patients was 60 years, and 56.9% were women. About 97% patients had common EGFR gene mutations of deletions in exon 19 (19 del) or a point mutation in exon 21 (L858R). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the Youden index, the optimal cut-off value of pretreatment AAPR was 0.47. Patients with high AAPR achieved longer median PFS and OS than patients with low AAPR (14.0 months vs 10.4 months, P<0.01; 58.2 months vs 36.7 months, P<0.001, respectively). The multivariate analysis by Cox’s proportional hazards regression model demonstrated that AAPR was an independent prognostic factor for both PFS (HR: 0.813, 95% CI: 0.673–0.984, P=0.033) and OS (HR: 0.629, 95% CI: 0.476–0.830, P=0.001).

Conclusion

Pretreatment AAPR, measured as part of routine blood biochemical test, may be a reliable prognostic indicator in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients treated with first-line first-generation EGFR-TKIs.

Pretreatment Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio Is a Prognostic Marker in Lung Cancer Patients: A Registry-Based Study of 7077 Lung Cancer Patients

Simple Summary

Since the albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) has shown promising prognostic prediction in cancer patients, the prognostic value of the AAPR was evaluated in a large cohort of 7077 lung cancer patients. We combined patient data from the Danish Lung Cancer Registry and the clinical laboratory information system (LABKA) and showed that a low AAPR was independently associated with an inferior median overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients and small cell lung cancer patients. Furthermore, data indicated a level-dependent correlation between the AAPR and survival and that the AAPR added additional prognostic value to the already well-established prognostic markers in lung cancer. Therefore, if our findings are validated in the future, the AAPR should be incorporated as a factor in the general prognostication of lung cancer patients.

Abstract

The albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) is a novel promising prognostic marker in cancer patients. However, the evidence for its significance in lung cancer is scarce. Therefore, we assessed the prognostic value of the AAPR in a large cohort of lung cancer patients. Data on lung cancer patients diagnosed from January 2009 to June 2018 were extracted from the Danish Lung Cancer Registry and combined with data on the pretreatment serum AAPR level extracted from the clinical laboratory information system (LABKA). AAPR tertiles were applied as cutoffs. Cox proportional hazard models assessed the prognostic value of the AAPR. In total, 5978 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and 1099 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients were included. Decreasing AAPR level was significantly associated with declining median overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients (medium vs. low AAPR, adjusted HR = 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68–0.79); high vs. low AAPR, adjusted HR = 0.68 (95% CI 0.62–0.73)) and in SCLC patients (medium vs. low AAPR, adjusted HR = 0.62 (95% CI 0.52–0.74); high vs. low, adjusted HR = 0.59 (95% CI 0.50–0.70)). In conclusion, the AAPR was an independent prognostic factor in NSCLC and SCLC patients. The correlation seems to be level dependent, with reducing survival found to be associated with decreasing AAPR level.

Decreased albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio predicted poor survival of resectable gastric cancer patients

Background

The albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) is an innovative prognostic index for various cancer patients, the clinical significance of the AAPR in patients with GC is unknown.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 227 resectable GC patients in our center. The Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyze the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) were used to compare the prognostic abilities of the TNM and AAPR-TNM staging systems in DFS and OS prediction.

Results

The AAPR was significantly decreased in GC patients, and the optimal cut-off value for resectable and benign gastric disease was 0.437 as determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The correlation analysis revealed that decreased AAPR in GC was associated with T stage (P=0.004) and TNM stage (P=0.013). Decreased preoperative AAPR correlated with both unfavorable disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox regression analysis showed that the TNM stage (DFS: P=0.001, OS: P=0.002) and differential levels of AAPR (DFS: P<0.001, OS: P<0.001) were independent risk factors of DFS and OS. ROC analysis showed that the AAPR-TNM system was more superior than the TNM staging system for DFS (z=1.91, P=0.028) and OS (z=1.937, P=0.026) prediction. The likelihood ratio test (LRT) analysis indicated that the AAPR-TNM system had a significantly larger χ² for both DFS (35.58 vs. 34.51, P<0.001) and OS (32.92 vs. 30.07, P<0.001), and a lower Akaike information criterion (AIC) value both for DFS (1,032 vs. 1,065, P<0.001) and OS (869 vs. 898, P<0.001) compared to the TNM system.

Conclusions

The AAPR level significantly decreased in patients with GC, and impacted the prognosis of patients.

Association Between the Pretreatment Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Bladder Cancer Treated With Radical Cystectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective

Serum albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) has been proven to be a prognostic indicator of many malignant tumors. However, whether it can predict the prognosis of bladder cancer (BC) patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) remains unclear. This study was designed to assess the relationship between AAPR and clinical outcomes in patients with BC treated with RC.

Methods

The clinicopathological data of 199 BC patients receiving RC in our institution from January 2012 to December 2017 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. They were divided into three groups based on the optimal cut-off values and the association between AAPR groups and their clinical outcomes were evaluated.

Results

The average age of the patients was (64.0 ± 8.7) years and 79.9% were male. Based on the cut-off values of AAPR, patients were divided into three groups: low-AAPR group (AAPR < 0.37, n = 35), medium-AAPR group (AAPR = 0.37-0.59, n = 61) and high-AAPR group (AAPR > 0.59, n = 103). The median overall survival (OS) of each AAPR group was 12.5, 24, and 29 months, respectively (P value <0.0001). After adjusting the Cox proportional hazards model, medium- and high- AAPR groups showed a reduced risk trend of death, with a risk ratio of 0.44 (95% CI = 0.21-0.91) and 0.25 (95% CI = 0.12-0.49), respectively (P for trend <0.001). No nonlinear relationship was identified by smooth fitting curve between AAPR and OS. By subgroup analysis, we observed that compared to the low-AAPR group, the trends of the HRs in the medium- and high-AAPR group were decreased across nearly all subgroups after stratification. Moreover, the AAPR-based nomograms for OS, CSS and RFS were also constructed. The C-index showed a good predictive accuracy (OS, C-index 0.728, 95% CI 0.663-0.793; CSS, C-index 0.792, 95% CI 0.748-0.838; RFS, C-index 0.784, 95% CI 0.739-0.829).

Conclusion

Pretreatment AAPR is significantly associated with the prognosis of BC patients receiving RC, which can be conducive to the clinical decision-making and risk stratification in those patients. The nomogram based on AAPR is a reliable model for predicting survival of BC patients after RC.

Prognostic Utility of Prechemoradiotherapy Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio in Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma Patients

Background

We investigated the prognostic usefulness of prechemoradiotherapy (CRT) albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) in unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPAC) patients managed with definitive concurrent CRT (CCRT).

Methods

A sum of 136 LAPAC patients who consecutively underwent definitive CCRT was retrospectively analyzed. The AAPR (serum albumin (g/dL)/serum alkaline phosphatase (IU/L)) was calculated by using the parameters obtained from the routine biochemistry tests on the first day of the CCRT. Ideal AAPR cutoff was sought by utilizing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The primary and secondary endpoints were the impact of the AAPR on the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) results, respectively.

Results

At a median follow-up of 14.8 months (range: 3.2-85.7), the median PFS and OS times were 7.5 (95% confidence interval (CI): 6.0-9.0) and 14.9 months (95% CI: 11.9-17.9), respectively. The ideal common AAPR cutoff was identified at the rounded 0.46 (area under the curve: 72.3%; sensitivity: 71.2%; specificity: 70.3%) point that dichotomized the patients into two groups: low AAPR (L-AAPR; N = 71) and high AAPR (H-AAPR; N = 65) groups, respectively. Comparative survival analyses showed that the L-AAPR cohort had significantly shorter median PFS (6.8 (95% CI: 5.7-7.9) versus 11.3 (95% CI: 9.9-12.7) months; P = 0.005) and OS (12.8 (95% CI: 10.6-15.0) versus 19.2 (95% CI: 16.9-21.5) months; P = 0.001) durations than their H-AAPR counterparts, separately. Albeit the N1-2 (P = 0.004) and CA 19‐9 > 90 U/mL (P = 0.008) were also found to be associated with inferior outcomes, yet the results of the multivariate analyses ascertained the L-AAPR as an independent indicator of diminished PFS (P = 0.003) and OS (P = 0.002) results.

Conclusion

The present results proposed that the pretreatment AAPR < 0.46 was a novel independent indicator of adverse PFS and OS in unresectable LAPAC patients undergoing definitive CCRT.

Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers: is it possible?

Background

The impact of albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) on prognosis in cancer patients remains uncertain, despite having multiple relevant studies in publication.

Methods

We systemically compiled literatures from 3 databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science) updated to May 24th, 2020. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed and synthesized using STATA 14, values were then pooled and utilized in order to assess the overall impact of AAPR on patient’s prognosis.

Results

In total, 18 studies involving 25 cohorts with 7019 cases were incorporated. Pooled results originated from both univariate and multivariate analyses (HR = 2.14, 95%CI:1.83–2.51, random-effects model; HR = 1.93, 95%CI:1.75–2.12, fixed-effects model; respectively) suggested that decreased AAPR had adverse effect on overall survival (OS). Similarly, pooled results from both univariate and multivariate analysis of fixed-effects model, evinced that decreased AAPR also had adverse effect on disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.81, 95%CI:1.60–2.04, I² = 29.5%, P = 0.174; HR = 1.69, 95%CI:1.45–1.97, I² = 13.0%, P = 0.330; respectively), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.71, 95%CI:1.31–2.22, I² = 0.0%, P = 0.754; HR = 1.90, 95%CI:1.16–3.12, I² = 0.0%, P = 0.339; respectively), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR = 2.22, 95%CI:1.67–2.95, I² = 5.6%, P = 0.347; HR = 1.88, 95%CI:1.38–2.57, I² = 26.4%, P = 0.244; respectively). Admittedly, heterogeneity and publication bias existed, but stratification of univariate meta-analytic results, as well as adjusted meta-analytic results via trim and fill method, all showed that AAPR still significantly correlated with poor OS despite of confounding factors.

Conclusions

In summary, decreased AAPR had adverse effect on prognosis in cancer patients. As an inexpensive and convenient ratio derived from liver function test, AAPR might become a promising indicator of prognosis in human cancers.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-07921-6.

Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio: A novel prognostic index for patients with driver mutation-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio (AAPR), a novel developed prognostic index for cancers. Chemotherapy was the only method for driver mutation-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (DANSCLC).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical significance of AAPR in these patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 167 DANSCLCs and 58 healthy controls. Associations of clinicopathological characteristics and survival analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

Significantly decreased AAPR level was uncovered in DANSCLC patients compared to healthy controls. The correlation analysis revealed that the low AAPR level in DANSCLCs was correlated with poor differentiation (P = .024). Cox regression analysis showed that N stage, M stage, and different levels of AAPR were the independent risk factors of PFS and OS. The median PFS and OS survival ratio in patients with high and low AAPR level was, respectively, 17 months and 8 months, and 23 months and 13 months. The AUC of AAPR for both PFS and OS were higher than that of albumin and alkaline phosphatase (p < 0.05). The low AAPR was associated with much shorter PFS and OS than the high AAPR (mPFS: 8 vs. 25 months; mOS: 12 vs. 36 months). In the AP cohort, the low AAPR group experienced significantly shorter PFS and OS than the high AAPR (mPFS: 7 vs. 25 months; mOS: 12 vs. 36 months). Meanwhile, there was no significance in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) patients and GP regimens cohort.

CONCLUSION

AAPR significantly decreased in patients with DANSCLC, and it affects the prognosis of patients with DANSCLC and is a biomarker for DANSCLCs prognosis and treatment choice.

Prognostic Value of Preoperative Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy

Objective

This study investigated the prognostic value of the preoperative albumin alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer after radical cystectomy.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy and urinary diversion at the Department of Urology Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from 2007 to 2015. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the relationship between preoperative AAPR and outcomes which include OS and CSS and RFS. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log rank test.

Results

In total, 174 patients were followed up for 1–125 months, with a median follow-up of 30 months, 93 survived and 81 patients died. The median serum AAPR level in all patients was 0.62 (range: 0.12–1.67). In multivariate analysis, the preoperative AAPR showed to be associated with overall survival (OS: HR 0.22,95% CI 0.06 to 0.82, P=0.024), cancer-specific survival (CSS: HR 0.12,95% CI 0.02 to 0.63, P=0.013) and recurrence-free survival (RFS: HR 0.15,95% CI 0.03 to 0.82, P=0.029) after adjustment for potential confounders. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that patients with low AAPR tertiles had shorter OS, CSS and RFS than patients with high AAPR tertiles (OS: P<0.001, CSS: P<0.001, RFS: P<0.001). The relationship between AARP and OS, CSS and RFS was linear.

Conclusion

Preoperative AAPR may be a potentially valuable prognostic marker in patients who underwent radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Recently, it has been reported that the pretreatment albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) is related to the prognosis of various cancers. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the prognostic value of pretreatment AAPR on clinical outcomes in cancer.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase were systematically searched for relevant research before May 2020. Stata 12 was utilized to extract the data and the characteristics of each study and to generate a pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) to assess the relationship between pretreatment AAPR and survival outcomes.

Results

We included 16 eligible published articles involving 5,716 patients. We found that low pretreatment AAPR was associated with poor overall survival (HR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.80–2.50, P < 0.001), cancer-specific survival (HR = 2.89, 95% CI: 1.46–5.71, P < 0.001), disease-free survival (HR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.43–2.53, P < 0.001), and progression-free survival (HR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.49–2.52, P < 0.001). However, there was no statistical relationship between pretreatment AAPR and recurrence-free survival, distant-metastasis-free survival, or locoregional relapse-free survival. The correlation between pretreatment AAPR and overall survival did not change significantly when possible confounders were stratified. The sensitivity analysis showed that this study was reliable.

Conclusions

Low pretreatment AAPR was significantly associated with adverse clinical outcomes of cancer. Pretreatment AAPR could be a valuable noninvasive prognostic indicator for cancer.

Prognostic effect of pretreatment albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio in human cancers: A meta-analysis

Purpose

It has been demonstrated that, for various types of cancer, the pretreatment albumin/alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) was a prognostic factor. Therefore, in order to determine AAPR’s prognostic effect on cancer, the meta-analysis was hereby performed.

Patients and methods

The relevant studies conducted before November 10, 2019, were comprehensively searched in Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase. HRs(hazard ratios) with related 95%CIs(confidence intervals) were adopted to estimate AAPR’s prognostic impact on overall survival (OS) & disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

Our meta-analysis involved thirteen cohort studies, which included 5,204 cases of 8 types. The results of this meta-analysis indicated that higher AAPR was corrected with better OS (pooled HR = 0.52; 95%CI = 0.47–0.58; P<0.001) and DFS (pooled HR = 0.55; 95%CI = 0.47–0.66; P<0.001). Subgroup analysis on OS was based on the cancer system, treatment methods, and cutoff value. Moreover, higher AAPR was statistically in associated with lighter infiltration (pooled OR = 0.79; 95%CI = 0.73–0.85; P<0.001), no lymph nodes metastasis (pooled OR = 0.89; 95%CI = 0.83–0.95; P = 0.001), and no distant metastasis (pooled OR = 0.92; 95%CI = 0.86–0.99; P = 0.028).

Conclusion

Higher AAPR was related to better prognosis of cancer, and in cancer therapy, AAPR could be taken as a promising marker of prognosis. It might help physicians to select the most appropriate treatments by evaluating the current status of patients with cancer. Future multicenter prospective clinical trials were required to verify its applications.

Pretreatment albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a prognostic indicator in solid cancers: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR), a novel and economic serum biomarker, is associated with survival in patients with cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the potential role of AAPR as a prognostic indicator of solid cancers.

METHODS

This meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of retrospective studies was designed to investigate the relationship between AAPR and overall survival (OS) in solid cancers. The meta-analysis included 5951 patients from 20 cohorts. The main predictor variable was AAPR, and the main outcome was OS. Statistical tests were performed using Stata 12.0, Revman 5.3, and R 3.6.1.

RESULTS

Compared to patients with a lower AAPR, those with a higher AAPR had a better OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-0.58; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by tumor type indicated that a higher AAPR was associated with a better OS in non-small cell lung cancer (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.26-0.78; p < 0.001), small cell lung cancer (HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.44-0.82; p < 0.001), hepatocellular carcinoma (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.34-0.69; p < 0.001), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.31-0.71; p < 0.001), and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.21-0.85; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment AAPR may be a useful prognostic indicator in solid cancers.

Prognostic Value of the Combination of CEA and Fibrinogen/Albumin Ratio in Resectable Gastric Cancer

Purpose

To investigate the prognostic value of combined serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and fibrinogen/albumin ratio (FAR) in patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC).

Introduction

This retrospective study evaluated the CEA, fibrinogen, and albumin levels and other clinicopathological features of GC patients. The prognostic significance of these factors for overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional models.

Patients and Methods

A total of 267 patients were included. The optimal cutoff values of CEA and FAR were 3.2 ng/mL and 0.086, respectively. Patients were stratified into three groups based on this cutoff value: CEA-FAR=0 (CEA <3.2 ng/mL and FAR <0.086), CEA-FAR=1 (CEA ≥3.2 ng/mL or FAR ≥0.086), and CEA-FAR=2 (CEA ≥3.2 ng/mL and FAR ≥0.086).

Results

Higher CEA-FAR was strongly associated with age, tumor size, tumor invasion, lymph node status, and TNM stage (all P<0.05). The OS rates differed significantly between these 3 groups (88.9% vs 65.0% vs 46.9%, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that CEA-FAR was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P<0.001). The area under the curve was larger for CEA-FAR than for either CEA or FAR alone (0.683, 0.644, and 0.669, respectively).

Conclusion

Preoperative CEA-FAR could be a potential blood marker for predicting tumor progression and the prognosis of GC patients. Patients with a higher CEA-FAR should undergo extensive follow-up.