Comparison of the results of two chest tube managements during an enhanced recovery program after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A randomized trial

A small-sized tube versus traditional closed thoracic drainage in uniportal thoracoscopic surgery

INTRODUCTION

To assess the feasibility and safety of placing a small-sized tube as drainage in patients after uniportal thoracoscopic lung resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who received uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) lung resection were identified in our database. Patients placed small-sized tube drainage were compared with those placed conventional chest tube in terms of characteristics, operation modality, post-operative pulmonary complications, post-operative pain, chest tube duration and post-operative hospital stay. Propensity score matching was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 217 enrolled patients, 173 were assigned to the conventional tube group and 44 were assigned to the small-sized tube group. Rates of post-operative pulmonary complications were relatively low and similar between the two groups. After propensity score matching, operation duration was shorter (1 h vs. 1.21 h, P = 0.01) was shorter, and the maximum value of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score after operation (1 vs. 1.5, P = 0.02) and the overall average value of VAS score after operation (0.33 vs. 0.88, P = 0.006) was lower in small-sized tube group. No significant difference was observed in chest tube duration (2 vs. 2, P = 0.34) and post-operative hospital stay (3 vs. 3, P = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to conventional chest tubes, small-sized tubes for post-operative drainage after U-VATS lung resection may be a safe and promising approach for reducing post-operative pain.

Safety of one 8.5-Fr pigtail catheter for postoperative continuous open gravity drainage after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery pneumonectomy

OBJECTIVES

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery pneumonectomy (U-VATS-P) is feasible and safe from a perioperative standpoint. How to choose the proper chest tube and drainage method is important in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. In this study, we aimed to assess the safety of one 8.5-Fr (1Fr = 0.333 mm) pigtail catheter for postoperative continuous open gravity drainage after U-VATS-P.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a single surgeon's experience with U-VATS-P for lung cancer from May 2016 to September 2022. Patients were managed with one 8.5-Fr pigtail catheter for postoperative continuous open gravity drainage after U-VATS-P. The clinical characteristics and perioperative outcomes of the patients were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 77 patients had one 8.5-Fr pigtail catheter placed for postoperative continuous open gravity drainage after U-VATS-P for lung cancer. The mean age was 60.9±7.39 (40-76) years; The mean FEV1 was 2.1±0.6 (l/s), and the mean FEV1% was 71.2±22.7. The median operative time was 191.38±59.32 min; the mean operative hemorrhage was 109.46±96.56 ml; the mean duration of postoperative chest tube drainage was 6.80±2.33 days; the mean drainage volumes in the first three days after operation were 186.31±50.97, 321.97±52.03, and 216.44±35.67 ml, respectively; and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.90±2.58 days. No patient experienced complications resulting from chest tube malfunction. Ten patients experienced minor complications. One patient with nonlife-threatening empyema and bronchopleural fistula required short rehospitalization for anti-inflammatory therapy and reintubation. Three patients with chylothorax were treated with intravenous nutrition. Four patients had atrial fibrillation that was controlled by antiarrhythmic therapy. Two patients had more thoracic hemorrhagic exudation after the operation, which was found in time and was cured effectively, so they were discharged from the hospital uneventfully after early hemostatic therapy and nutritional support.

CONCLUSIONS

All patients in this study received early postoperative rehabilitation, and the rate of relevant complications was low. We therefore recommend a single 8.5-Fr pigtail catheter for postoperative continuous open gravity drainage as an effective, safe and reliable drainage method for the management of U-VATS-P.

Patent conversion of a novel closed chest drainage device

Closed chest drainage is typically necessary following Lobar and Sublobar resections to evacuate gases and fluids from the thoracic cavity, eliminate residual pleural space for lung expansion, and maintain negative pressure. Currently, three conventional closed chest drainage systems are commonly employed: single-chamber, double-chamber, and triple-chamber systems; each system has its own advantages and disadvantages. Despite the emergence of digital drainage systems in recent years, their high cost hinders their widespread adoption. Based on this premise, our research team has achieved a patent for a micro air pump-integrated chest closed drainage bottle, which has been further developed into a novel device integrating a three-chamber system with negative pressure control and power supply capabilities. This device enables patients undergoing perioperative lung procedures to ambulate freely while simultaneously receiving chest suction therapy-a concept that theoretically promotes rapid postoperative recovery. Moreover, this device offers economic benefits and holds potential for clinical implementation (particularly in economically underdeveloped regions). In this article, we modified the thoracic closed drainage device based on our patent and presented this novel thoracic closed drainage device after 3D printing and assembly.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Thresholds for Drain Removal After Anatomic Lung Resection

BACKGROUND

The criteria for chest drain removal after lung resections remain vague and rely on personal experience instead of evidence. Because pleural fluid resorption is proportional to body weight, a weight-related approach seems reasonable. We examined the feasibility of a weight-adjusted fluid output threshold concerning postoperative respiratory complications and the occurrence of symptomatic pleural effusion after chest drain removal. Our secondary objectives were the hospital length of stay and pain levels before and after chest drain removal.

METHODS

This was a single-center randomized controlled trial including 337 patients planned for open or thoracoscopic anatomical lung resections. Patients were randomly assigned postoperatively into 2 groups. The chest drain was removed in the study group according to a fluid output threshold calculated by the 5 mL × body weight (in kg)/24 hours formula. In the control group, our previous traditional fluid threshold of 200 mL/24 hours was applied.

RESULTS

No differences were evident regarding the occurrence of pleural effusion and dyspnea at discharge and 30 days postoperatively. In the logistic regression analysis, the surgical modality was a risk factor for other complications, and age was the only variable influencing postoperative dyspnea. Time to chest drain removal was identical in both groups, and time to discharge was shorter after open surgery in the test group.

CONCLUSIONS

No increased postoperative complications occurred with this weight-based formula, and a trend toward earlier discharge after open surgery was observed in the test group.

Making a Painless Drain: Proof of Concept

Chest tubes account for a large proportion of postoperative pain after cardiothoracic operations. The objective of this study was to develop a novel, cost-effective, easy-to-use, lidocaine-eluting coating to reduce pain associated with postoperative chest tubes. A lidocaine-eluting hydrogel was developed by dispersing lidocaine-loaded nanoparticles in an aqueous solution containing gelatin (5%). Glutaraldehyde (1%) was added to crosslink the gelatin into a hydrogel. The hydrogel was dehydrated, resulting in a thin, stable polymer. Sterile lidocaine hydrogel-coated silicone discs and control discs were prepared and surgically implanted in the subcutaneous space of C57B6 mice. Using von Frey filaments, mice underwent preoperative baseline pain testing, followed by pain testing on post-procedure day 1 and 3. On post-procedure day 1, mice implanted with control discs demonstrated no change in pain tolerance compared to baseline, while mice implanted with 20 mg and 80 mg lidocaine-loaded discs demonstrated a 2.4-fold (P = 0.36) and 4.7-fold (P = 0.01) increase in pain tolerance, respectively. On post-procedure day 3, mice implanted with control discs demonstrated a 0.7-fold decrease in pain tolerance compared to baseline, while mice implanted with 20 mg and 80 mg lidocaine-loaded discs demonstrated a 1.8-fold (P = 0.88) and 8.4-fold (P = 0.02) increase in pain tolerance, respectively. Our results demonstrate successful development of a lidocaine-eluting chest tube with hydrogel coating, leading to improved pain tolerance in vivo. The concept of a drug-eluting drain coating has significant importance due to its potential universal application in a variety of drain types and insertion locations.

Promising Effects of Digital Chest Tube Drainage System for Pulmonary Resection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Objective: The chest tube drainage system (CTDS) of choice for the pleural cavity after pulmonary resection remains controversial. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to assess the length of hospital stay, chest tube placement duration, and prolonged air leak among different types of CTDS. Methods: This systemic review and NMA included 21 randomized controlled trials (3399 patients) in PubMed and Embase until 1 June 2021. We performed a frequentist random effect in our NMA, and a P-score was adopted to determine the best treatment. We assessed the clinical efficacy of different CTDSs (digital/suction/non-suction) using the length of hospital stay, chest tube placement duration, and presence of prolonged air leak. Results: Based on the NMA, digital CTDS was the most beneficial intervention for the length of hospital stay, being 1.4 days less than that of suction CTDS (mean difference (MD): −1.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): −2.20 to −0.60). Digital CTDS also had significantly reduced chest tube placement duration, being 0.68 days less than that of suction CTDSs (MD: −0.68; 95% CI: −1.32 to −0.04). Neither digital nor non-suction CTDS significantly reduced the risk of prolonged air leak. Conclusions: Digital CTDS is associated with better outcomes than suction and non-suction CTDS for patients undergoing pulmonary resections, specifically 0.68 days shorter chest tube duration and 1.4 days shorter hospital stay than suction CTDS.

Effect of general anesthesia with thoracic paravertebral block on postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative delirium (POD) is characterized by acute brain dysfunction, especially in elderly patients. Postoperative pain is an important factor in the development of delirium, and effective pain management can reduce the risk of POD. Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) can effectively relieve postoperative pain and inhibit the perioperative stress and inflammatory response. We investigated whether the combination of TPVB with general anesthesia reduced the occurrence of POD following thoracoscopic lobectomy.

METHODS

A total of 338 elderly patients, aged 65-80 years, who underwent elective surgery for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATS) were randomly assigned to either a patient-controlled intravenous analgesia group (PIA) or a patient-controlled paravertebral-block analgesia group (PBA). POD was evaluated using the 3-min diagnostic confusion assessment method (3D-CAM). The postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) was assessed with Chinese version of QoR-40 scale. Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) score. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and neurofilament light (NFL) levels were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits.

RESULTS

Delirium occurred in 47 (28%) of 168 cases in the PIA group and 28 (16.5%) of 170 cases in the PBA group (RR 1.7, p = 0.03). PBA was also associated with a higher rate of overall recovery quality at day 7 after surgery (27.1% vs. 17.3%, P = 0.013) compared with PIA. The incremental change in surgery-induced TNF-α and NFL was greater in the PIA group than PBA group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Thoracic paravertebral block analgesia is associated with lower incidence of postoperative delirium, probably due to its anti-neuroinflammatory effects. Furthermore, as a component of multimodal analgesia, TPVB provides not only superior analgesic but also opioid-sparing effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Center ( www.chictr.org.cn ; registration number: ChiCTR 2,000,033,238 ) on 25/05/2018.

A simple size-tailored algorithm for the removal of chest drain following minimally invasive lobectomy: a prospective randomized study

Background

The pleural space can resorb 0.11–0.36 ml/kg of body weight/hour (h) per hemithorax. There are only a limited number of studies on thresholds for chest drain removal (CDR) and all are based on arbitrary amounts, for example, 300 ml/day. We studied an individualized size-based threshold for CDR–specifically 5 ml/kg, a simple, easily applicable measure.

Methods

This is a single-center prospective randomized trial enrolling 80 patients undergoing VATS lobectomy. There were two groups: an experimental (E) group, in which once the daily output went down to 5 ml/kg the chest drain was removed and a control (C) group, with chest drain removal as per our current practice of less than 250 ml/day.

Results

The groups did not differ in pre- and peri- and postoperative characteristics, except for chest drain duration (mean, SD 2.02 ± 0.97 vs. 3.25 ± 1.39 days, p < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (median, IQR 4.5; 3 vs. 6; 2.75 days, p = 0.008) in favor of E group. The re-intervention rate was the same in both groups (once in each group).

Conclusion

The new threshold for chest drain removal following thoracoscopic lobectomy of 5 ml/kg/d leads to both shorter chest drainage and hospital stay without apparent increase in morbidity. (Clinical registration number: DRKS00014252).

Clinical application of a multi-groove silicone drain combined with unidirectional negative-pressure drainage system in single-operating-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery: a comparison study

Objective

To evaluate the effect of a new negative-pressure drainage system in thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery; thereby, providing a new option for postoperative drainage.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data for 200 patients who underwent thoracoscopic surgery between May 2018 and October 2019. According to the thoracic drainage method, the patients were divided into the thoracic tube group and the new system group. The epidemiological and clinicopathological data were compared before operation, and the clinical effect of thoracic drainage was compared after operation.

Results

There was no significant difference in epidemiological and clinicopathological data between the two groups. There was also no significant difference in drain removal time, hospital stay, and complication rates between the two groups. However, the incidences of pleural effusion and poor incision healing in the new system group were lower than in the thoracic tube group. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores in the new system group were lower than those in the thoracic tube group at each postoperative interval; therefore, the new system group required less analgesia.

Conclusion

The new system was not inferior to thoracic tubes regarding the drainage effect after thoracoscopic lung cancer surgery. Hence, the system is an alternative to traditional thoracic tubes.

[Effects of different postoperative analgesic strategies on postoperative neurocognitive function and quality of recovery in elderly patients undergoing one lung ventilation]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of different postoperative analgesic strategies on neurocognitive function and quality of recovery in elderly patients at 7 days after thoracic surgery with one lung ventilation.

METHODS

Ninety elderly patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery were randomized into 3 groups (n=30) to receive postoperative analgesia with thoracic paravertebral block analgesia (TA), epidural analgesia (EA) and intravenous analgesia (GA). Before and at 7 days after the surgery, the patients' cognitive function was assessed using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and their early recovery at 7 days postoperatively was evaluated using Quality of Recovery-40 items (QoR-40).

RESULTS

The patients in TA and EA groups had significantly higher MMSE scores and lower incidence of postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction (PNCD) than those in GA group without significant difference between the former two groups. At 7 days after the surgery, serum levels of S100-β and MMP-9 were significantly higher in GA group than in TA and EA group, and did not differ significantly between the latter two groups. QoR-40 scores were significantly higher in TA and EA groups than in GA group, and were higher in TA group than in EA group. The chest intubation time and length of hospital stay were significantly shorter in TA and EA groups than in GA group.

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly patients undergoing surgeries with one lung ventilation, general anesthesia combined with either postoperative continuous thoracic paravertebral block or epidural analgesia can significantly improve postoperative neurocognitive function and quality of recovery, but continuous thoracic paravertebral block analgesia can be more advantageous for improving postoperative quality of recovery.