Subxiphoid uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A cosmetically superior approach to submammary rib tumor resection

Comparative clinical experience of subcostal VATS versus conventional uniportal lateral VATS approach

INTRODUCTION

The present study reports the first clinical experience with subcostal uniportal VATS (suVATS) compared with the conventional lateral uniportal VATS (luVATS) approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent suVATS between January 2019 and April 2020 were included. Patients who had undergone luVATS for similar indications were included as the control group. The data were prospectively and retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

The suVATS group included 38 patients with a mean age of 61 (30-83) years. The luVATS group included 33 patients (mean age, 69 years; range: 46-89 years). An intercostal block was performed intraoperatively in the luVATS group. Local infiltration under anaesthesia was performed around the incision in the suVATS group. The duration of the surgery was significantly longer in the suVATS group. However, the chest tube treatment and hospital stay duration were significantly shorter in the suVATS group. The routinely recorded Visual Analogue Scale scores on the first post-operative day and the day of discharge were significantly lower in the suVATS group.

CONCLUSION

Subcostal uniportal VATS enables a shorter drainage treatment duration and hospital stay and significantly reduces post-operative pain. Thus, a faster patient recovery can be achieved.

Safety of subxiphoid uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for anterior mediastinal tumour in obese patients

Introduction

Subxiphoid uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been gradually applied for the treatment of anterior mediastinal tumour (AMT). However, whether obesity is a risk factor for subxiphoid uniportal VATS for AMT is still unknown.

Aim

To explore the safety and short-term outcome of subxiphoid uniportal VATS for AMT in obese patients.

Material and methods

The clinical data of 142 patients who received VATS via subxiphoid approach for AMT were analysed. According to body mass index (BMI), the patients were divided into an obese group (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m²) and a non-obese group (BMI < 28 kg/m²). Then, the clinical and surgical characteristics between the obese group and the non-obese group were analysed to explore the effect of obesity on VATS for AMT. The pain scores were evaluated by the Numeric Rating Scale.

Results

The operative time and tracheal intubation time using subxiphoid uniportal VATS for AMT in the obese group were longer than that in the non-obese group (p < 0.05). However, there was no obvious difference in intraoperative blood loss, chest tube drainage time, chest tube drainage volume, and length of hospital stay between the obese group and the non-obese group (p > 0.05). Moreover, there was also no significant difference in postoperative complications, including pulmonary complications, wound infection, arrhythmia, and pulmonary leak, between the obese group and the non-obese group. In addition, the pain scores in the obese group were similar to those in the non-obese group.

Conclusions

Although obesity might prolong operative time of subxiphoid uniportal VAST for AMT, it does not increase the rate of postoperative complications. An experienced centre can properly conduct VAST via subxiphoid approach when treating AMT in obese patients.