Management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related dermatologic adverse events

Checkpoint inhibitor-induced lichen planus differs from spontaneous lichen planus on the clinical, histological, and gene expression level

Background

Although highly efficacious, immune checkpoint inhibitors induce a multitude of immune-related adverse events including lichenoid skin reactions (irLP) that are often therapy-resistant.

Objectives

To compare the clinical, histological, and transcriptional features of irLP with spontaneous lichen planus (LP).

Methods

Clinical and histological presentations of irLP and LP, as well as the gene expression profiles of irLP and LP lesional and healthy skin were assessed.

Results

irLP differed considerably from LP with regard to the distribution pattern of skin lesions with irLP appearing mostly in an exanthematous form, whereas lesions were more localized in the LP group. Histologically, dermal lymphocyte infiltration was significantly lower in irLP compared with LP, whereas lymphocyte exocytosis and apoptotic keratinocytes were significantly higher in irLP. Gene expression analysis revealed irLP to have a more inflammatory profile with elevated IFNG levels and a possible role of phagosome signaling compared with LP.

Limitations

The study is descriptive and necessitates further investigation with larger cohorts and broader analyses.

Conclusion

irLP differs from spontaneous LP on the clinical, histopathological, and gene expression level. The inflammatory gene signature in irLP suggests that topical JAK inhibitors could be an effective treatment, targeting local skin inflammation without systemic immunosuppression.

Clinical Experience of External Application of Clearing Heat and Removing Dampness in Relieving Grade 2 to 3 Rash Caused by Programed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1)/Programed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Inhibitors: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

In China, grade 2 to 3 immune-related rash will probably lead to the interruption of immunotherapy. Corticosteroid (CS) is the main treatment, but not always effective. The external application of clearing heat and removing dampness, which is represented by Qing-Re-Li-Shi Formula (QRLSF), has been used in our hospital to treat immune-related cutaneous adverse events (ircAEs) for the last 5 years. The purpose of this study was to discuss its efficacy and safety in the treatment of grade 2 to 3 rash.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with grade 2 to 3 immune-related rash in our hospital from December 2019 to December 2022 was conducted. These patients received QRLSF treatment. Clinical characteristics, treatment outcome, and health-related quality of life (HrQoL) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with grade 2 to 3 rash (median onset time: 64.5 days) were included. The skin lesions of 24 cases (80%) returned to grade 1 with a median time of 8 days. The accompanying symptoms were also improved with median time of 3 to 4 days. The addition of antihistamine (AH) drug didn't increase the efficacy of QRLSF (AH + QRLSF: 75.00% vs QRLSF: 83.33%, P = .66). No significant difference was observed in the efficacy of QRLSF treatment regardless of whether patients had previously received CS therapy (untreated population: 88.24% vs treated population: 69.23%, P = .36). During 1-month follow-up, 2 cases (8.33%) underwent relapses. In terms of HrQoL, QRLSF treatment could significantly reduce the median scores of all domains of Skindex-16, including symptoms (39.58 vs 8.33, P < .0001), emotions (58.33 vs 15.48, P < .0001), functioning (46.67 vs 13.33, P < .0001) and composite (52.60 vs 14.06, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

External application of clearing heat and removing dampness was proven to be an effective and safe treatment for such patients. In the future, high-quality trials are required to determine its clinical application in the field of ircAEs.

How to recognize and manage skin toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a practical approach

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment strategies in the field of oncology. Their favourable outcomes in terms of efficacy and side-effect profile can be thwarted by the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Cutaneous irAEs are relatively common in patients undergoing immunotherapy and include common inflammatory dermatoses (e.g. eczematous, psoriasiform and lichenoid phenotypes), maculopapular eruptions, pruritus and immunobullous disorders. Most of these reactions can be managed without ICIs having to be stopped completely; however, there are some life-threatening toxicities that dermatologists and oncologists should be aware of. In this review, we focus on how to recognize the commonly associated cutaneous irAEs, touching upon rarer reactions and red flags; finally, we provide guidance on their management.

Shedding light on the side effects of immunotherapies used for leukemia: an updated review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Leukemia is an abnormal clonal development of leukemic cells originating from the bone marrow, which is widely known for its significant prevalence and mortality rate. Chemotherapy, surgery, radiation, and combination therapies have been its routine therapeutic methods; however, the advent of cancer immunotherapy is known as revolutionary for its higher efficacy and lesser toxicity.

AREAS COVERED

Immunotherapy boosts the body's immune system by using components from other living organisms. Although immunotherapy seems to be safer than chemotherapy, many studies have noticed different immune-related side effects in various body systems (e.g. cardiovascular, neurologic) which we have reviewed in this investigation as the main goal. We tried to describe immunotherapy-related side effects in human body systems in detail.

EXPERT OPINION

Being aware of these side effects leads to better clinical decision-making for each individual, and a one-step-ahead management in case of occurrence. We also briefly discussed the role of immunotherapy in treating leukemia as one of the most prevalent cancers in children and tried to emphasize that it is crucial to monitor adverse events as they may remain obscure until adolescence.

Adalimumab for Sintilimab-Induced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in a Patient with Metastatic Gastric Malignancy: A Case Report and Literature Review

Sintilimab is a recombinant fully human anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction of PD-1 with its ligand. It was approved to use in patients with gastric malignancy. Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a rare, life-threatening cutaneous drug reaction. Here, we report a 70-year-old female patient with gastric malignancy who developed severe TEN 10 days after initiation of sintilimab. The patient did not respond to the systemic corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin therapies but improved after the subcutaneous injection of adalimumab (40 mg) that is a monoclonal antibody directed against antitumor necrosis factor-α. Her rashes rapidly resolved within 24 hr. By the seventh day, the bullae had scabbed and most skin lesions had subsided. The patient showed no sign of organ dysfunction. This is the first reported case of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced TEN successfully treated with adalimumab.

Role of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Cancer: A Systematic Review

Tremendous progress has been made in cancer research over the years, and, as a result, immunotherapy has emerged as an important therapy for the treatment of cancer, either as a stand-alone treatment or in conjunction with other cancer therapies. Immunotherapy has demonstrated encouraging outcomes and offers a viable strategy for not only enhancing the quality of life but also dramatically boosting the overall survival rate of cancer patients. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of immunotherapy in the treatment of cancer. Databases such as PubMed and Science Direct were searched from their inception until September 2021, using the following keywords: cancer immunotherapy, cancer recurrence, cancer treatment options, and cancer therapies. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA protocol. There were a total of 599 articles; however, after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final review ended up with 34 publications. In conclusion, the studies have demonstrated that immunotherapy is a viable alternative treatment option for patients with recurrent or metastatic cancer, since the overall survival rate and progression-free survival rate were shown to be successful.

Pembrolizumab-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

For advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been regarded as one of the optimal therapies. While immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are common in ICI treatment, cutaneous toxicities are among the most common irAEs. Most immune-related skin toxicity grades are low, and the prognosis is good. However, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) is a rare but extremely severe cutaneous adverse drug reaction with high mortality.

CASE SUMMARY

We report a rare case of SJS induced by pembrolizumab. The case involved a 68-year-old female who was diagnosed with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. SJS appeared after one cycle of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. After treatment with prednisone hormone symptoms, anti-infection, gamma globulin, and antipruritic agents, the skin toxicity of the patients gradually decreased and eventually disappeared. Although the antitumor treatment was stopped due to serious adverse reactions, the tumor of the patient remained stable for nearly half a year after one cycle of immune therapy combined with chemotherapy, which also corroborates the delayed effect of immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

We believe our report can provide some references for the treatment of SJS and the treatment of immune-related adverse reactions.

Etanercept treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

BACKGROUND

Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction to drugs with considerable morbidity and mortality. Immunomodulators for SJS/TEN including systemic corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) have been widely used in clinical practice. Emerging evidence suggested the therapeutic effects of tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists on SJS/TEN.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of IVIG and systemic steroids in conjunction with or without etanercept, a tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor, for patients with SJS/TEN.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective review of 41 patients with SJS/TEN admitted to our institution from 2015 to February 2021. A total of 25 patients with integrated data were involved in this study, of which 14 patients were treated with IVIG and corticosteroids and 11 were in addition given etanercept. The clinical characteristics, duration of hospitalization, exposure time to high-dose steroids, and the total amount of systemic steroids were analyzed.

RESULTS

In comparison to conventional therapy, conjunction with etanercept reduced the duration of hospitalization (13.5 vs 19.0 days; P = .01), the exposure time of high-dose steroids (7.1 vs 14.9 days; P = .01), and the overall amount of systemic steroid (925 mg vs 1412.5 mg; P = .03) in patients with SJS/TEN. No pronounced adverse effects were observed within 6 months of follow-up after the treatment.

CONCLUSION

The add-in of etanercept at the time of initiating conventional therapy could be a superior option to accelerate disease recovery and reduce the high dose and total amount of systemic steroids without pronounced adverse events in patients with SJS/TEN.

Cutaneous Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review Article

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as novel options that are effective in treating various cancers. They are monoclonal antibodies that target cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). However, activation of the immune systems through ICIs may concomitantly trigger a constellation of immunologic symptoms and signs, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with the skin being the most commonly involved organ. The dermatologic toxicities are observed in nearly half of the patients treated with ICIs, mainly in the form of maculopapular rash and pruritus. In the majority of cases, these cutaneous irAEs are self-limiting and manageable, and continuation of the ICIs is possible. This review provides an overview of variable ICI-mediated dermatologic reactions and describes the clinical and histopathologic presentation. Early and accurate diagnosis, recognition of severe toxicities, and appropriate management are key goals to achieve the most favorable outcomes and quality of life in cancer patients.

Carrier-Free Nanomedicine for Cancer Immunotherapy

With the rapid development of nanotechnology, carrier-based nano-drug delivery systems (DDSs) have been widely studied due to their advantages in optimizing pharmacokinetic and distribution profiles. However, despite those merits, some carrier-related limitations, such as low drug-loading capacity, systematic toxicity and unclear metabolism, usually prevent their further clinical transformation. Carrier-free nanomedicines with non-therapeutic excipients, are considered as an excellent paradigm to overcome these obstacles, owing to their superiority in improving both drug delivery efficacy and safety concern. In recent years, carrier-free nanomedicines have opened new horizons for cancer immunotherapy, and have already made outstanding progress. Herein, in this review, we are focusing on making an integrated and exhaustive overview of lately reports about them. Firstly, the major synthetic strategies of carrier-free nanomedicines are introduced, such as nanocrystals, prodrug-, amphiphilic drug-drug conjugates (ADDCs)-, polymer-drug conjugates-, and peptide-drug conjugates (PepDCs)-assembled nanomedicines. Afterwards, the typical applications of carrier-free nanomedicines in cancer immunotherapy are well-discussed, including cancer vaccines, cytokine therapy, enhancing T-cell checkpoint inhibition, as well as modulating tumor microenvironment (TME). After that, both the advantages and the potential challenges, as well as the future prospects of carrier-free nanomedicines in cancer immunotherapy, were discussed. And we believe that it would be of great potential practiced and reference value to the relative fields.

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Caused by Enzalutamide: A Case Report and Literature Review

OBJECTIVE

Enzalutamide is the most frequently prescribed compound for treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Common adverse drug events of enzalutamide are febrile neutropenia, hot flashes, hypertension, and fatigue.

METHODS

We present a case of a patient with mCRPC who received enzalutamide and developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS). The culprit drug was confirmed using the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale. Clinical characteristics and management principles were analyzed in combination with literature reports.

RESULTS

SJS occurred within two weeks of enzalutamide therapy. Supportive care such as steroid treatment led to a complete resolution of skin lesions and improved clinical symptoms after three weeks.

CONCLUSION

Most cutaneous adverse events occur early during enzalutamide therapy, and close observation should be given within two weeks of starting treatment.

Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

With proven efficacy of the use of immunotherapy in almost all stages of NSCLC, immunotherapy toxicity has become a very important topic that requires immediate recognition and management. The diagnosis of toxicities associated with immunotherapy in lung cancer can be very challenging and often requires multidisciplinary effort. This mini review gives an overview of the diagnosis and management of immune-related adverse events that arise from using immunotherapy in NSCLC, as well as the potential biomarkers for its early identification and future directions.

Systemic adverse effects and toxicities associated with immunotherapy: A review

Immunotherapy is rapidly evolving secondary to the advent of newer immunotherapeutic agents and increasing approval of the current agents by the United States Food and Drug Administration to treat a wide spectrum of cancers. Immunotherapeutic agents have gained immense popularity due to their tumor-specific action. Immunotherapy is slowly transforming into a separate therapeutic entity, and the fifth pillar of management for cancers alongside surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. However, like any therapeutic entity it has its own adverse effects. With the increasing use of immuno-therapeutic agents, it is vital for physicians to acquaint themselves with these adverse effects. The aim of this review is to investigate the common systemic adverse effects and toxicities associated with the use of different classes of immunotherapeutic agents. We provide an overview of potential adverse effects and toxicities associated with different classes of immunotherapeutic agents organized by organ systems, as well as an extensive discussion of the current recommendations for treatment and clinical trial data. As we continue to see increasing usage of these agents in clinical practice, it is vital for physicians to familiarize themselves with these effects.