Combined neat model for the prognosis of postoperative stage III-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Prognostic value of blood-based protein biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer: A critical review and 2008-2022 update

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic possibilities for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have considerably increased during recent decades.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the prognostic relevance of serum tumor markers (STM) for early and late-stage NSCLC patients treated with classical chemotherapies, novel targeted and immune therapies.

METHODS

A PubMed database search was conducted for prognostic studies on carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1), neuron-specific enolase, squamous-cell carcinoma antigen, progastrin-releasing-peptide, CA125, CA 19-9 and CA 15-3 STMs in NSCLC patients published from 2008 until June 2022.

RESULTS

Out of 1069 studies, 141 were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. A considerable heterogeneity regarding design, patient number, analytical and statistical methods was observed. High pretherapeutic CYFRA 21-1 levels and insufficient decreases indicated unfavorable prognosis in many studies on NSCLC patients treated with chemo-, targeted and immunotherapies or their combinations in early and advanced stages. Similar results were seen for CEA in chemotherapy, however, high pretherapeutic levels were sometimes favorable in targeted therapies. CA125 is a promising prognostic marker in patients treated with immunotherapies. Combinations of STMs further increased the prognostic value over single markers.

CONCLUSION

Protein STMs, especially CYFRA 21-1, have prognostic potential in early and advanced stage NSCLC. For future STM investigations, better adherence to comparable study designs, analytical methods, outcome measures and statistical evaluation standards is recommended.

Role of prognostic nutritional index in postoperative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is known to be correlated with clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, its role has not been studied in patients who have undergone postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between PNI and survival and recurrence in NSCLC patients with PORT.

METHODS

We reviewed 97 stage I-III NSCLC patients who received PORT between January 2006 and December 2016 at our institution. We obtained PNI values for both pre-RT (within 1 month before PORT) and post-RT (within 2 months after PORT) by using serum albumin and lymphocyte count. A cutoff value for PNI was determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). The median follow-up period was 52.8 months.

RESULTS

The ROC curve of post-RT PNI exhibited a higher area under the curve (AUC 0.68, cut-off: 47.1) than that of pre-RT PNI (AUC 0.55, cutoff: 50.3), so the group was divided into high post-RT PNI (> 47.1) and low post-RT PNI ( ≤ 47.1). The five-year overall survival rate (OS) was 66.2% in the high post-RT group, compared with 41.8% in the low post-RT PNI group (p = 0.018). Those with both low pre-RT and low post-RT PNI had the worst five-year OS of 31.1%. Post-RT PNI (HR 0.92, p = 0.003) was an independent risk factor for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

PNI after PORT was significantly associated with survival. This finding suggests that PNI can be used as a prognostic marker.

Age-stratified and gender-specific reference intervals of six tumor markers panel of lung cancer: A geographic-based multicenter study in China

Background

Serum biomarkers have been widely adopted in clinical practice for assisting lung cancer diagnoses, therapeutic monitoring, and prognostication. The function of a well‐performing tumor biomarker depends on a reliable reference interval (RI) with consideration of the study subjects’ age, gender, and geographical location. This study aimed to establish a RI for each of 6 lung cancer biomarkers for use in the whole country of China on Mindray platform.

Methods

The levels of serum 6 lung cancer biomarkers—namely progastrin‐releasing peptide (ProGRP), neuron‐specific enolase (NSE), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin‐19 fragment (CYFRA21‐1), and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4)—were measured utilizing the chemiluminescence immunoassay on the Mindray CL‐6000i platform following the laboratory standard operating procedures in apparently healthy Chinese individuals on large cohort, multicenter, and geographical consideration bases. The CLSI EP28‐A3C guideline was followed for the enrollment of study subjects.

Results

The age‐stratified, gender‐specific RIs for ProGRP, NSE, SCC, CEA, CYFRA21‐1, and HE4 lung cancer biomarkers in the Chinese population have been established as described in the results and discussion in this work. In addition, various levels of the six lung cancer biomarkers among nine geographical locations in China have been observed.

Conclusions

The sample volume of study cohort, age, and geographical location should be considered upon establishing a reliable biomarker RI. A RI for each of six lung cancer biomarkers has been established. The results from this study would be helpful for clinical laboratories in interpreting the analytical results and for clinicians in patient management.