Response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung adenocarcinoma with the rare epidermal growth factor receptor mutation S768I and G724S: A case report and literature review

Six first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors reveal novel inhibition potential for the EGFR S768I mutation

Lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer-related mortality, is the most commonly diagnosed cancer. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are considered a drug-targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, limited data are available involving the activity of EGFR TKIs against rare EGFR mutations. Here, based on an endogenous EGFR-depleted cell Line H3255 by CRISPR, H3255 cells with rare mutant EGFR^S768I and compound mutations EGFR^S768I+L858R were tested using cell proliferation assay, cytotoxicity, membrane potential, flow cytometry and Western blot analysis. We conducted cytotoxicity screening of EGFR mutations on six front-line TKIs based on first-, second-, and third-generation TKIs (afatinib, dacomitinib, osimertinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, and icotinib). The results showed that the sensitivity of these mutants containing rare variants EGFR^S768I to six front-line TKIs was enriched in the irreversible TKI cytotoxicity assays by determining their change in cytotoxicity, apoptosis, cell proliferation and signal pathway factors. Importantly, the variants harboring EGFR^L858R (H3255), EGFR^S768I (H3255^S768I) and EGFR^S768I+L858R (H3255^S768I+L858R) were sensitive to six TKIs and induced cytotoxicity through different pathways. Moreover, the compound mutations EGFR^S768I+L858R showed more TKI resistance than EGFR^S768I mutation and EGFR^L858R mutation. We present a comprehensive reference for the sensitivity of EGFR^S768I variants to six front-line TKIs. For patients with the EGFR S768I mutation and compound mutations EGFR^S768I+L858R, six first-line TKIs appear to be reasonable therapeutic options.

Successful treatment of Afatinib reversing EGFR Ex19Del/G724S resistance guided by protein-drug docking

G724S is a rare mutation induced by different generations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). No clinical effective drugs toward G724S mutation have been reported till now. We analyzed the interaction of three drugs (afatinib, gefitinib, osimertinib) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) from three aspects: the spatial structure of the binding region, the scoring function value, and the interaction force between drug molecules and active center of EGFR. Our results indicate that afatinib remains effective to patients with EGFR Exon19Deletion(Ex19Del) and G724S mutations whereas osimertinib and gefitinib are not, which is consistent with other reports. Afatinib is reported to be effective against G724S mutation, but no long‐term clinical survival has been reported till now. A patient with stage IV adenocarcinoma was found to have Ex19Del/G724S mutation. Treated with afatinib, he received a progression‐free survival of more than 1 year. With the guidance of this case report, we provide the clinical evidence of using afatinib for patients with G724S mutations and obtaining long‐term clinical survival.

This brief communication presents the case of a patient with acquired Ex19Del/G724S mutation who was treated with afatinib and obtained long‐term clinical benefit.

A Nationwide Study on the Impact of Routine Testing for EGFR Mutations in Advanced NSCLC Reveals Distinct Survival Patterns Based on EGFR Mutation Subclasses

EGFR mutation analysis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is currently standard-of-care. We determined the uptake of EGFR testing, test results and survival of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients in the Netherlands, with the overall objective to characterize the landscape of clinically actionable EGFR mutations and determine the role and clinical relevance of uncommon and composite EGFR mutations. Non-squamous NSCLC patients diagnosed in 2013, 2015 and 2017 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) and matched to the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA). Overall, 10,254 patients were included. Between 2013-2017, the uptake of EGFR testing gradually increased from 72.7% to 80.9% (p < 0.001). Multi-gene testing via next-generation sequencing (increased from 7.8% to 78.7% (p < 0.001), but did not affect the number of detected EGFR mutations (n = 925; 11.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 11.0-12.4) nor the distribution of variants. For patients treated with first-line EGFR inhibitors (n = 651), exon 19 deletions were associated with longer OS than L858R (HR 1.58; 95% CI, 1.30-1.92; p < 0.001) or uncommon, actionable variants (HR 2.13; 95% CI, 1.60-2.84; p < 0.001). Interestingly, OS for patients with L858R was similar to those with uncommon, actionable variants (HR 1.31; 95% CI, 0.98-1.75; p = 0.069). Our analysis indicates that grouping exon 19 deletions and L858R into one class of 'common' EGFR mutations in a clinical trial may mask the true activity of an EGFR inhibitor towards specific mutations.