Real-life effectiveness of first-line anticancer treatments in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients: Data from the Czech TULUNG Registry

Effectiveness of first-line anticancer treatment may predict treatment response in further lines in stage III/IV patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to evaluate if therapeutic success in the first-line of anticancer treatments in patients with NSCLC may predict treatment success in the following lines.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of patients with NSCLC stage III/IV from the TULUNG registry separately for chemotherapy, TKIs, ALK inhibitors, and immunotherapy in the first line during the years 2011-2019. "Succesful treatment " was defined as PFS ≥ 6 months, a "good responder " was a patient with ˃50% of "successful treatment " lines. Treatment responses were analyzed separately for each drug group. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact test, Pearson Chi-Squared test, log-rank test, and univariate/multivariate logistic regression models were used.

RESULTS

The first-line TKI therapy was successful in 66.2%, while good responders accounted for 50.7% of the cohort and their rates were similar for all types of TKIs. First-line platinum-based chemotherapy was successful in 43.1% and 48.6% for combinations with pemetrexed and bevacizumab, respectively. Good responders accounted for 29.5% and 25.9%, respectively. In the group of ALK inhibitors, we observed treatment success in 52.3% of cases, while alectinib showed the highest effectiveness (up to 70%). Good responders constituted 50% of the group. In the first-line immunotherapy group, survival benefit was observed in 52.3%, and good responders constituted 52.3% of the cohort.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that the treatment success in first-line therapies in patients with NSCLC may predict survival benefits in the subsequent lines, particularly in EGFR- or ALK-positive disease and immunotherapy-treated patients.

Advanced Lung Cancer Patients' Use of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Overall Survival: Real-World Evidence from Quebec, Canada

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are breakthrough palliative treatments for advanced lung cancer patients with tumors harboring mutations in the EGFR gene. Using healthcare administrative data, three cohorts were created to describe the use of three EGFR-TKIs that are publicly funded in Quebec for specific indications (i.e., 1st-line gefitinib, 1st-line afatinib, and post-EGFR-TKI osimertinib). The main objective was to compare overall survival (OS) among patients receiving these treatments to those in previous experimental and real-world studies. The patients who received EGFR-TKIs for indications of interest between 1 April 2001, and 31 March 2019 (or 31 March 2020, for post-EGFR-TKI osimertinib) were included to estimate the Kaplan-Meier-based median OS for each cohort. An extensive literature search was conducted to include comparable studies. For the gefitinib 1st-line (n = 457), the afatinib 1st-line (n = 80), and the post-EGFR-TKI osimertinib (n = 119) cohorts, we found a median OS (in months) of 18.9 (95%CI: 16.3-21.9), 26.6 (95%CI: 13.7-NE) and 19.9 (95%CI: 17.4-NE), respectively. Out of the 20 studies that we retained from the literature review and where comparisons were feasible, 17 (85%) had similar OS results, which further confirms the value of these breakthrough therapies in real-world clinical practice.

Real-world data with afatinib in Spanish patients with treatment-naïve non-small-cell lung cancer harboring exon 19 deletions in epidermal growth factor receptor (Del19 EGFR): Clinical experience of the Galician Lung Cancer Group

BACKGROUND

In clinical studies, first-line afatinib demonstrated efficacy in Del19-EGFR NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, non-interventional study assessed efficacy and safety of first-line afatinib in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC with Del19-EGFR from Galicia (Spain), with a preplanned analysis by age (<70 vs ≥70 years).

RESULTS

Median age of 46 patients enrolled was 69.5 years (range 37-87). The objective response rate (ORR) was 78.2%, with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 20.5 months (95% CI 12.7, 28.3) and median overall survival (OS) of 37.5 months (95% CI 19.2-55.8). Outcomes by age (<70 vs ≥70 years) were ORR of 82.6% vs 73.9%, median PFS of 20.2 months (95% CI 14.8-25.6) vs 24.1 (9.8-38.3), and median OS of 45.1 months (95% CI, 17.0-73.1) vs 33.9 (28.7-39.1), respectively. Median treatment duration was 17.2 months (range 0.4-64.1) with 11 patients still on treatment; 14 patients received osimertinib at discontinuation due to T790M. Grade 3 adverse events included mucositis (n = 7, 15.2%), skin toxicity (n = 9, 19.6%), and diarrhea (n = 6, 13.0%) that were manageable with dose reductions. The afatinib dose was reduced in 31 patients (67.4%) and treatment was discontinued in 8 patients (17.4%) due to adverse events. By age (<70 vs ≥70 years), afatinib was dose-reduced in 13 (56.5%) vs 18 patients (78.3%) and discontinued in 3 (13.0%) vs 5 patients (21.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PFS in our patients was longer than reported in clinical studies with similar response rates and toxicity, even in older patients, reflecting a good risk-benefit from afatinib in patients with Del19-EGFR NSCLC.

MICROABSTRACT

This real-world study of first-line afatinib in Caucasian patients with Del19 EGFR NSCLC reported durable efficacy and showed that older patients (> 70 years) benefitted from afatinib as much as younger patients. The safety profile of afatinib was as expected, albeit more dose reductions in older patients. Afatinib may be an option for patients with Del19 EGFR NSCLC, even in those who are older.

Efficacy and Safety of Afatinib in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Mutations: A Meta-Analysis of Real-World Evidence

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to explore the efficacy and safety of afatinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations based on real-world evidence.

Materials and Methods

Eligible real-world studies were identified from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Cochrane guidelines were used to assess the quality of included studies. Cochran's Q test and I² statistics were used for the heterogeneity analysis.

Results

Twenty-five studies were included in this meta-analysis; nine studies were included in the qualitative descriptive analysis. The summarized disease control rate (DCR) was 87.6% (81.5%, 92.7%), and the overall response rate (ORR) was 58.9% (48.8%, 68.7%). The pooled median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 (10.3, 14.5) months, mean time to failure (TTF) was 15.4 (13.6, 17.2) months, and median overall survival (OS) was 31.6 (26.7, 36.5) months. The total incidences of adverse events (AEs) for skin rashes, diarrhea, paronychia, and mucositis were 71.4% (64.4%, 77.9%), 70.4% (60.1%, 79.8%), 52.1% (41.9, 62.3%), and 36.5% (29.5%, 43.8%), respectively. The incidences of severe adverse events (SAEs, Grade ≥3) for diarrhea, skin rashes, paronychia, and mucositis were 9.7% (6.8%, 13.1%), 5.8% (4.5%, 7.2%), 3.8% (2.0%, 6.2%), and 2.1% (1.0%, 3.6%), respectively. Differences in PFS and OS between the afatinib non-full-dose (<40 mg) and full-dose (>40 mg) groups were not significant (P > 0.05). However, the ORR in the full-dose group was 78.5% (66.7%, 88.4%), which was significantly higher than that in the non-full-dose group (67.8% [56.8%, 77.9%]).

Conclusion

The efficacy and safety of afatinib has been confirmed by real-world evidence in advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutation, consistent with randomized controlled trial results. In real-world setting, tolerability-guided dose adjustment might not affect the afatinib efficacy.