Prognostic impact of chronological age on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer: Real-world data from 86 173 patients

Real-world comprehensive genomic and immune profiling reveals distinct age- and sex-based genomic and immune landscapes in tumors of patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction

Younger patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (<50 years) represent a significant patient population with distinct clinicopathological features and enriched targetable genomic alterations compared to older patients. However, previous studies of younger NSCLC suffer from inconsistent findings, few studies have incorporated sex into their analyses, and studies targeting age-related differences in the tumor immune microenvironment are lacking.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 8,230 patients with NSCLC, comparing genomic alterations and immunogenic markers of younger and older patients while also considering differences between male and female patients. We defined older patients as those ≥65 years and used a 5-year sliding threshold from <45 to <65 years to define various groups of younger patients. Additionally, in an independent cohort of patients with NSCLC, we use our observations to inform testing of the combinatorial effect of age and sex on survival of patients given immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy.

Results

We observed distinct genomic and immune microenvironment profiles for tumors of younger patients compared to tumors of older patients. Younger patient tumors were enriched in clinically relevant genomic alterations and had gene expression patterns indicative of reduced immune system activation, which was most evident when analyzing male patients. Further, we found younger male patients treated with immunotherapy alone had significantly worse survival compared to male patients ≥65 years, while the addition of chemotherapy reduced this disparity. Contrarily, we found younger female patients had significantly better survival compared to female patients ≥65 years when treated with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy, while treatment with immunotherapy alone resulted in similar outcomes.

Discussion

These results show the value of comprehensive genomic and immune profiling (CGIP) for informing clinical treatment of younger patients with NSCLC and provides support for broader coverage of CGIP for younger patients with advanced NSCLC.

Immunosenescence and immunotherapy in older NSCLC patients

Nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) predominantly affects the elderly since its incidence and mortality rates skyrocket beyond the age of 65. The landscape of NSCLC treatment has been revolutionized by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which have emerged after a long and mostly inactive period of conventional treatment protocols. However, there is limited data on the exact effects of these chemicals on older patients, whose care can be complicated by a variety of conditions. This highlights the need to understand the efficacy of emerging cancer medicines in older patients. In this study, we will review the data of ICIs from clinical trials that were relevant to older people with NSCLC and poor performance status. We will also discuss the role of immunosenescence in immunotherapy and biomarkers in predicting the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Comparison of clinical efficacy between chrono-chemotherapy and conventional chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

This work focused on the clinical efficacy of chrono-chemotherapy and conventional chemotherapy on patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), providing a theoretical basis for the clinical promotion of chrono-chemotherapy. 60 NSCLS patients in our hospital were randomly enrolled into a chrono-chemotherapy group and a conventional chemotherapy group, with 30 cases in each. Patients were treated with the standardized first-line treatment TP regimen (paclitaxel + cisplatin). After two cycles of chemotherapy, the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of patients receiving various methods were observed. After the chemotherapy, CD3+, CD4+, and CD28+ increased while NK cells, B cells, and CD28- decreased in the conventional chemotherapy group (P<0.05); CD3+, CD4+, CD4+CD8+, B cells, and CD28+ increased while CD8+, NK cells, and CD28- decreased in chrono-chemotherapy group (P<0.05). The progression-free survival (PFS) of patients in the chrono-chemotherapy group (3.29 ± 0.46 years vs 2.56 ± 0.35 years) was longer (P<0.05). The quality of life (QOL) score in the chrono-chemotherapy group was higher (64.83 ± 1.54 points vs 51.72 ± 1.89 points) (P<0.05). The incidences of leukopenia (63.33%) and nausea and vomiting (53.33%) in the conventional chemotherapy group were higher than those in the chrono-chemotherapy group (30.00% and 30.00, respectively) (P<0.05). The chrono-chemotherapy could improve the cellular immune function of NSCLS patients, prolong their survival period, elevate the QOL, and reduce the side effects.

The progresses of relevant factors on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the non-small cell lung cancer patients

Lung cancer has the highest mortality rate of all cancers worldwide. Although immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy can improve the survival of patients with lung cancer, its efficacy is affected by many factors. Therefore, it is necessary to identify factors that affect the efficacy of ICI-based treatment and establish a model for predicting drug response and resistance before and during treatment for individualized and accurate treatment of patients. This review summarizes the clinical and biological factors related to ICI-based treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the recent research progress of predictive models for assessing ICI efficacy.

Exploring low-dose radiotherapy to overcome radio-immunotherapy resistance

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the current treatment landscape for cancer, yet the response rates of ICIs remain unmet. Synergistic with immunotherapy, low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) has been demonstrated to activate anti-tumor immunity - a transition from traditional radiation therapy geared toward local radical treatment to a type of immunological adjuvant. As such, studies utilizing LDRT to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy have been increasing preclinically and clinically. This paper reviews the recent strategies of using LDRT to overcome the resistance of ICIs, as well as providing potential opportunities in cancer treatment. Despite the potential of LDRT in immunotherapy is recognized, the mechanisms behind this form of treatment remain largely elusive. Thus, we reviewed history, mechanisms and challenges associated with this form of treatment, as well as different modes of its application, to provide relatively accurate practice standards for LDRT as a sensitizing treatment when combined with immunotherapy or radio-immunotherapy.

Immunotherapy in Elderly Patients Affected by Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 80% of all lung cancers, and most NSCLC is diagnosed in the advanced stage. The advent of immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) changed the therapeutic scenario both in metastatic disease (in first and subsequent lines) and earlier settings. Comorbidities, reduced organ function, cognitive deterioration, and social impairment give reasons for a greater probability of adverse events, making the treatment of elderly patients challenging. The reduced toxicity of ICIs compared to standard chemotherapy makes this approach attractive in this population. The effectiveness of ICIs varies according to age, and patients older than 75 years may benefit less than younger patients. This may be related to the so-called immunosenescence, a phenomenon that refers to the reduced activity of immunity with older age. Elders are often under-represented in clinical trials, even if they are a large part of the patients in a clinical practice. In this review, we aim to explore the biological aspects of immunosenescence and to report and analyze the most relevant and recent literature findings on the role of immunotherapy in elderly patients with NSCLC.

Efficacy of Atezolizumab for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Clinical and Molecular Features: A Meta-Analysis

Objective

Atezolizumab is becoming a significant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its efficacy needs to be further improved. The aims of this study are to clarify the potency of atezolizumab-based therapy in advanced NSCLC patients with different clinical and molecular features, and to choose a better therapeutic regimen of atezolizumab to achieve more precise treatment in immunotherapy.

Methods

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase Science Direct, and Google Scholar, together with major oncology conferences that compared atezolizumab with chemotherapy-based treatment for individuals with advanced NSCLC published prior to February 2022, were searched. Studies, bias risk assessment, and data extraction were selected by two independent authors. We extracted the basic features of the included studies, together with the 95% confidence interval (CI) and hazard ratios (HRs), from all patients and subgroups. The combined treatment data were assessed using the inverse variance weighting method.

Results

Seven RCTs including 4,859 patients were included. Our meta-analysis findings indicated that atezolizumab substantially enhanced OS (HR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77–0.88; p < 0.00001) and PFS (HR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61–0.85; p < 0.0001) in patients with advanced NSCLC compared with chemotherapy-based treatment. Atezolizumab substantially enhanced OS in patients aged <65 years old and 65–74 years old, those with wild-type EGFR, those without liver metastases, active or previous smokers, white patients and those with TC3 or IC3, TC2/3 or IC2/3, TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3, and TC0 and IC0, but not in patients aged ≥75 years, never smokers, those with liver metastases, those with EGFR mutant, Asians, Black or African Americans, or those with TC1/2 or IC1/2. Patients with advanced NSCLC who received atezolizumab showed OS improvement regardless of sex (male or female), histological type (non-squamous or squamous NSCLC), performance status (0 or 1), and line of treatment (1st-line therapy or ≥2nd-line therapy). Subgroup analysis revealed that male individuals, those with non-squamous NSCLC, those with PS 1, active or previous smokers, and those with wild-type EGFR, TC3 or IC3, and TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 achieved OS benefit from atezolizumab treatment not related to the treatment line and treatment regimen.

Conclusions

Age group, smoking history, liver metastasis status, EGFR mutation status, race, and PD-L1 expression can be used to predict the potency of atezolizumab and provide a better treatment regimen for patients with advanced NSCLC to achieve accurate and personalized treatment.

Inhibitors of PD-1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Molecular Features

Objective

PD-1 inhibitors have become an indispensable treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), but the potential predictive value of clinical and molecular features need to be clarified. The objective of the study was to study the potency of PD-1 inhibitors in patients with NSCLC in contexts of both clinical and molecular features, and to aid identification of patients for choice of type of PD-1 inhibitor therapy in order to acquire more accurate NSCLC treatment in immunotherapy.

Method

PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase Science Direct, the Cochrane library, and major oncology conferences were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that were published prior to December 2021. RCTs that had PD-1 inhibitor alone or in combination with chemotherapy with non-PD-1 inhibitor for the treatment of NSCLC patients were selected. Two authors independently selected studies, data extraction and bias risk assessment. Basic characteristics of included studies, and also the 95% confidence interval and hazard ratios of the overall patients and subgroups were recorded. The inverse variance weighted method was used to estimate pooled treatment data.

Result

A total of eleven RCTs including 5,887 patients were involved. PD-1 inhibitors-based therapy substantially enhanced OS compared with non-PD-1 inhibitor therapy in patients with age group <65 years, 65–74 years, active or previous smokers, without brain metastases, liver metastases, EGFR wild-type patients, individuals in East Asia and U.S./Canada, but not in patients with age group ≥75 years, never smokers, brain metastases, EGFR mutant patients or individuals in Europe. OS was improved in patients with NSCLC who received PD-1 inhibitors regardless of their gender (male or female), histomorphological subtypes (squamous or non-squamous NSCLC), performance status (0 or 1), and PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) (<1%, ≥1%, 1–49%, or ≥50%). An analysis of subgroups revealed that, patients with age group <65 years old, male, non squamous cell carcinoma, PS 1, TPS ≥1%, and TPS ≥50% benefited from pembrolizumab treatment not related with treatment line and treatment regimen.

Conclusion

Age group, smoking history, metastasis status/site, EGFR mutation status, and region can be used to predict the potency of PD-1 inhibitors, and to be individualized to choose different types of PD-1 inhibitors, and treatment regimen for NSCLC patients.

Distinctive Role of the Systemic Inflammatory Profile in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Younger and Elderly Patients Treated with a PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Blockade: A Real-World Retrospective Multi-Institutional Analysis

An immune checkpoint blockade with mAbs to PD-1 and PD-L1 is an expanding therapeutic option for mNSCLC patients. This treatment strategy is based on the use of mAbs able to restore the anti-tumor activity of intratumoral T cells inhibited by PD-1 binding to PD-L1/2 on tumor and inflammatory cells. It has been speculated that a chronic status of systemic inflammation as well as the immunosenescence physiologically occurring in elderly patients may affect the efficacy of the treatment and the occurrence of irAEs. We performed a multi-institutional retrospective study aimed at evaluating the effects of these mAbs (nivolumab or atezolizumab) in 117 mNSCLC patients younger (90 cases) and older (27 cases) than 75 years in correlation with multiple inflammatory parameters (NLR, CRP, ESR, LDH and PCT). No differences were observed when the cohorts were compared in terms of the frequency of PFS, OS, inflammatory markers and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Similarly, the occurrence of irAEs was strictly correlated with a prolonged OS survival in both groups. On the contrary, a negative correlation between the high baseline levels of inflammatory markers and OS could be demonstrated in the younger cohort only. Overall, PD-1/PD-L1-blocking mAbs were equally effective in young and elderly mNSCLC patients; however, the detrimental influence of a systemic inflammation at the baseline was only observed in young patients, suggesting different aging-related inflammation immunoregulative effects.

Prognostic impact of chronological age on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer: Real-world data from 86 173 patients

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become standard pharmacological therapies in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because elderly patients with NSCLC are often excluded from clinical trials as a result of lower functional capacity or comorbidities, the prognostic impact of chronological age on the efficacy of ICIs is unclear. The National Cancer Database was queried for stage IV NSCLC patients between 2014 and 2015. Associations between ICI therapy and clinical characteristics were assessed using chi‐squared tests. Kaplan–Meier curves were compared using the log‐rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify clinical characteristics predictive of overall survival (OS). This study included 24 136 patients with stage IV NSCLC aged ≥75 years and 62 037 patients with stage IV NSCLC aged <75 years. Patients aged ≥75 years treated with ICIs had significantly longer OS than those not treated with ICIs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58–0.64, p < 0.0001). The corresponding HR in patients aged <75 years was 0.67 (95% CI 0.65–0.68, p < 0.0001). Cox modeling confirmed the survival benefit of ICI therapy in patients aged ≥75 years (HR for patients not receiving ICIs 1.63 [95% CI: 1.55–1.71], p < 0.0001). The corresponding HR in patients aged <75 years was 1.47 (95% CI 1.43–1.51, p < 0.0001). Chronological age does not appear to negatively impact the survival benefit of ICI therapy in patients with stage IV NSCLC according to this large real‐world database analysis.