Association of the programmed death ligand‐1 combined positive score in tumors and clinicopathological features in esophageal cancer

Efficacy and Safety of First-line Therapies for Advanced Unresectable Oesophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

AIM

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced unresectable oesophageal squamous cell cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis was carried out by retrieving and retaining relevant literature from databases. The studies were randomised controlled trials comparing first-line treatments for advanced unresectable oesophageal squamous cell cancer. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to assess clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Nine studies including 4499 patients receiving first-line treatments were analysed. For all populations, toripalimab plus chemotherapy tended to provide the best overall survival (hazard ratio 0.58, 95% confidence intervals 0.43-0.78) and sintilimab plus chemotherapy provided the best progression-free survival (0.56, 0.46-0.68). Nivolumab plus chemotherapy presented the best objective response rate (odds ratio 2.45, 1.78-3.42) and camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (0.47, 0.29-0.74) appeared to be the safest. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy (0.55, 0.40-0.75) and nivolumab (0.54, 0.37-0.80) plus chemotherapy had the best overall survival in programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumour proportion score <1% and ≥1% subgroups. Toripalimab plus chemotherapy (0.61, 0.40-0.93) and pembrolizumab (0.57, 0.43-0.75) were the best in overall survival in combined positive score <10 and ≥10 subgroups, respectively. Toripalimab plus chemotherapy showed the best overall survival in the Asian group; pembrolizumab presented better overall survival in the Asian population than the non-Asian group.

CONCLUSION

Most immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy showed superior clinical benefits and sintilimab plus chemotherapy, toripalimab plus chemotherapy and tislelizumab plus chemotherapy had better comprehensive clinical efficacy. PD-L1 expression detection and ethnicity differences are still of great significance and most suitable regimens varied from each subgroup.

18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT parameters predict PD-L1 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Purpose

This prospective study examined whether metabolism parameters obtained using the tracer 18F-AlFNOTA-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-04 (denoted as 18F-FAPI-04) in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can predict programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC).

Patients and methods

The 24 enrolled LA-ESCC patients underwent an 18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT scan. The maximum, mean, peak and standard deviation standard uptake values (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak and SUVsd), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion FAP (TLF) expression of the primary tumor were collected. Additionally, we evaluated PD-L1 expression on cancer cells by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence methods. Patients were divided into negative and positive expressions according to the expression of PD-L1 (CPS < 10 and CPS ≥ 10), and the variables were compared between the two groups.

Results

The SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak and SUVsd were significantly higher in patients with positive expression than in negative expression (all p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified SUVmean (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.882, p = 0.004), SUVsd (AUC = 0.874, p = 0.005), SUVpeak (AUC = 0.840, p = 0.010) and SUVmax (AUC = 0.765, p = 0.045) as significant predictors of the PD-L1 positive expression, with cutoff values of 9.67, 1.90, 9.67 and 13.71, respectively. On univariate logistic regression analysis, SUVmean (p = 0.045), SUVsd (p = 0.024), and SUVpeak (p = 0.031) were significantly correlated with the PD-L1 positive expression. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, SUVsd (p = 0.035) was an optimum predictor factor for PD-L1 positive expression.

Conclusion

18F-FAPI-04 PET/CT parameters, including SUVmean, SUVpeak, and SUVsd, correlated with PD-L1 expression in patients with LA-ESCC, and thus SUVsd was an optimum predictor for PD-L1 positive expression, which could help to explore the existence of immune checkpoints and select ESCC candidates for immunotherapy.

Cost-effectiveness of toripalimab plus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Toripalimab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) against programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). It has been approved for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) as the first-line treatment due to significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the JUPITER-06 trial.

AIM

This study aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness between toripalimab plus chemotherapy and placebo plus chemotherapy from the perspective of the Chinese health system.

METHOD

The study developed a 3-year partitioned survival model to assess costs and outcomes in two treatment groups with or without toripalimab. The critical indicator was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Scenario and sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings and identify the parameters with the greatest impact on cost-effectiveness.

RESULTS

In the base case analysis, the incremental effectiveness and cost of toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy were 0.26 quality-adjusted life year (QALYs) and $11,254.84, respectively, resulting in an ICER of $43,405.09/QALY, higher than the 2021 willingness-to-pay threshold in China ($37,658.70/QALY). The results were sensitive to the utility of PFS, the incidence of neutropenia in the toripalimab group, and the cost of toripalimab. The toripalimab plus chemotherapy group was cost-effective only if the price of toripalimab decreased by more than 40%.

CONCLUSION

Adding toripalimab to chemotherapy was not cost-effective in patients with advanced ESCC in China.

Perineural Invasion Is a Significant Indicator of High Malignant Degree and Poor Prognosis in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Perineural invasion (PNI) is a malignant metastatic mode of tumors and has been reported in many tumors including esophageal cancer (EC). However, the role of PNI in EC has been reported differently. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to focus on the role of PNI in EC.

Methods

Eight databases of CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, Scopus, Wiley, ISI, PubMed, and EBSCO are used for literature search. The association of PNI with gender, pathological stages of T and N (pT and pN), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), lymph node metastasis, 5-year overall survival (OS), and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was examined in the meta-analysis by Revman5.0 Software. The pooled OR/HR and 95% CI were used to assess the risk and prognostic value.

Results

Sixty-nine published studies were screened for analysis of PNI in EC. The incidence of PNI in esophageal squamous carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) was different, but not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The PNI-positive patients had a significantly higher risk of pT stage (OR = 3.85, 95% CI = 2.45–6.05, p < 0.00001), pN stage (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.52–2.28, p < 0.00001), LVI (OR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.55–3.85, p = 0.0001), and lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.56–5.29, p = 0.0007). Furthermore, the cumulative analysis revealed a significant correlation between PNI and poor OS (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.24–1.51, p < 0.0001), as well as poor DFS (HR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.38–1.74, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

PNI occurrence is significantly related to tumor stage, LVI, lymph node metastasis, OS, and DFS. These results indicate that PNI can serve as an indicator of high malignant degree and poor prognosis in EC.