Erlotinib with or without bevacizumab as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced nonsquamous epidermal growth factor receptor-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Exploratory subgroup analyses from the phase II JO25567 study

Clinical outcome of bevacizumab or ramucirumab combined with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors as the first line therapy in susceptible EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung

Combining epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with an anti- vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent, bevacizumab or ramucirumab, is indicated for advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutation. This study aimed to show the real-world data of combination therapy and compare the effectiveness between bevacizumab and ramucirumab in combination with an EGFR-TKI. This retrospective study enrolled 47 patients diagnosed of stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with exon 19 deletion or L858R point mutation, receiving a first-line EGFR-TKI with anti-VEGF agent, including 34 (72%) and 13 (28%) patients receiving bevacizumab and ramucirumab, respectively. The response rate was similar in both groups (p = 0.38). Patients receiving bevacizumab had similar progression free survival (PFS) as those receiving ramucirumab (median PFS: 21.9 vs. 24.2 months, p = 0.4871); similar finding was noted in overall survival (OS) (median OS: 33.5 months vs. not reached, p = 0.4618). Patients receiving ramucirumab experienced a significantly high-grade hypertension compared to those receiving bevacizumab (p = 0.0351). Multivariable Cox regression analysis found independent risk factors for worse PFS included poorer ECOG performance status, multiple (≥3) metastatic sites, brain metastasis, and pleural metastasis/effusion, while the type of anti-VEGF agent was not a risk factor. Pericardial metastasis/effusion was the only one independent risk factor for worse OS. In summary, ramucirumab may have similar effectiveness as bevacizumab in combination with an EGFR-TKI as first line therapy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring susceptible EGFR mutation. Further large-scale registry-based cohort studies may be needed to validate our findings.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for of advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in Asian populations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background: According to the 2023 guidelines for treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), first-line treatment and recently developed agents for the treatment of epidermal growth factor (EGFR) mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were compared in this meta-analysis. Treatment regimens involved in the included studies included first, second, and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), TKIs plus chemotherapy, TKIs plus angiogenesis inhibitors, and platinum-containing doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. Considering the varying efficacy and safety of drugs in people of different ethnic origins, the optimal regimen should be determined, and the safety of first-line treatments should be assessed in the Asian population specifically. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were systematically searched to retrieve reports on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with research data published from inception to 1 February 2023. Adopting Asian patient populations as the target (including studies in which Asian patients accounted for more than 50% of the sample), a network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted for comparison of treatment regimens and treatments were ranked based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Results: A total of 19 RCTs involving 5,824 patients and covering 14 treatment regimens were included. The primary outcome measure examined in this study was progression-free survival (PFS); other outcome measures examined were overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), occurrence of any adverse events (AE), occurrence of adverse events of grade 3 or above (≥3AE), and occurrence of serious adverse events (SAE). In terms of PFS, all regimens including TKIs (as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies), as well as bevacizumab (Bev) plus chemotherapy (Ch) were found to be significantly superior to basic chemotherapy (HRs: 0.09-0.61, p < 0.05 in all cases compared with Ch alone). The highest-ranking therapies were erlotinib (Erl) plus Bev (SUCRA: 0.94) and Erl plus ramucirumab (Ram) (SUCRA: 0.93). Regarding OS, no significant differences was observed between first-line treatment strategies; the top four treatments based on SUCRA, in rank order, were Bev + Ch (0.87), gefitinib (Gef) plus Ch (0.81), dacomitinib (Dac) (0.79), and osimertinib (Osi) (0.69). Additionally, there were no significant differences between first-line treatment strategies in terms of DCR. Regarding ORR, the top three treatments based on SUCRA were Erl + Bev (0.85), Erl + Ram (0.76), and Gef + Ch (0.74). No significant difference between first-line treatment strategies was observed in terms of the risk of AE. However, based on SUCRA, Erl ranked highest on avoidance of ≥ 3AE (0.97), and Osi ranked highest on avoidance of SAE (0.91). Conclusion: Based on these analyses of survival benefits, tumor burden response, and safety, furmonertinib (Fur), Osi, and aumolertinib (Aum) may represent the best treatment regimen options for Asian patients, significantly prolonging survival (as measured by median PFS/OS), eliciting a greater tumor burden response, and exposing patients to a lower risk of adverse events. Although Erl + Bev and Erl + Ram are associated with the best survival benefits in terms of PFS, further clinical studies are still needed to identify ways to reduce the risk of adverse events. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php? ID=CRD42023407994, identifier CRD42023407994.

Osimertinib and Bevacizumab Cotreatment for Untreated EGFR-Mutated NSCLC With Malignant Pleural or Pericardial Effusion (SPIRAL II): A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 2 Clinical Trial

Introduction

First-line treatment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC with erlotinib plus antiangiogenic inhibitor exhibits promising results. However, the efficacy of this combination has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC complicated with malignant pleural or pericardial effusion (MPE) for whom combination therapy may be particularly effective.

Methods

This single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of the bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) and osimertinib (80 mg) combination in the first-line setting for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with MPE. The primary end point of this study was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end points were objective response rate, PFS, overall survival, drainage-free survival without the need for thoracic or pericardial drainage, and safety.

Results

Between January 2019 and August 2020, a total of 31 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC were enrolled from Japan in the study. The median PFS was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.3–11.3), the 1-year PFS was 32.1% (80% CI: 21.4–43.3), and the objective response rate was 74.2% (95% CI: 56.8–86.3). The median overall survival was not reached. The median drainage-free survival was 18.4 months (95% CI: 10.3–not estimable). Anorexia was the most common grade 3 or higher adverse event (four patients, 12.9%), followed by fatigue and dyspnea (three patients, 9.7%). No treatment-related deaths were recorded.

Conclusions

Osimertinib and bevacizumab combination in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with MPE were safe but did not effectively increase PFS when compared with the inferred value from previous literature.