|
1
|
Zirafa CC, Manfredini B, Romano G, Sicolo E, Castaldi A, Bagalà E, Morganti R, Cariello C, Davini F, Melfi F. Comparison of Robotic and Open Lobectomy for Lung Cancer in Marginal Pulmonary Function Patients: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study. Curr Oncol 2023; 31:132-144. [PMID: 38248094 PMCID: PMC10814225 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31010009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with reduced respiratory function represents a challenge for thoracic surgeons. Minimally invasive surgery seems to be beneficial for these patients because it reduces tissue trauma and its impact on respiratory mechanics. Application of the robotic technique, the use of CO2 insufflation and longer surgical time are factors that could influence the outcomes of marginal pulmonary function patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the robotic technique on the postoperative outcomes of patients with poor lung function. METHODS We retrospectively collected and analyzed data from consecutive marginal respiratory function patients who underwent robotic or open lobectomy for NSCLC. Data regarding clinical, operative and postoperative details were compared between the open and robotic approaches. RESULTS The outcomes of 100 patients with reduced respiratory function were evaluated, of whom 59 underwent open lobectomies and 41 underwent robotic lobectomies. Robotic lobectomy was characterized by a longer operative time, a reduced hospital stay and a lower incidence of postoperative complications (22% vs. 33.9%), when compared to the open approach. CONCLUSION Robotic lobectomy is a safe and feasible procedure for patients with marginal pulmonary function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmelina Cristina Zirafa
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (B.M.); (G.R.); (E.S.); (A.C.); (E.B.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Beatrice Manfredini
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (B.M.); (G.R.); (E.S.); (A.C.); (E.B.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Gaetano Romano
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (B.M.); (G.R.); (E.S.); (A.C.); (E.B.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Elisa Sicolo
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (B.M.); (G.R.); (E.S.); (A.C.); (E.B.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Andrea Castaldi
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (B.M.); (G.R.); (E.S.); (A.C.); (E.B.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Elena Bagalà
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (B.M.); (G.R.); (E.S.); (A.C.); (E.B.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Riccardo Morganti
- Section of Statistics, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Claudia Cariello
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Federico Davini
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (B.M.); (G.R.); (E.S.); (A.C.); (E.B.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Franca Melfi
- Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thoracic Surgery, Surgical, Medical, Molecular, and Critical Care Pathology Department, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (B.M.); (G.R.); (E.S.); (A.C.); (E.B.); (F.D.); (F.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Sang J, Ye X. Potential biomarkers for predicting immune response and outcomes in lung cancer patients undergoing thermal ablation. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1268331. [PMID: 38022658 PMCID: PMC10646301 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1268331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Thermal ablation is a promising alternative treatment for lung cancer. It disintegrates cancer cells and releases antigens, followed by the remodeling of local tumor immune microenvironment and the activation of anti-tumor immune responses, enhancing the overall effectiveness of the treatment. Biomarkers can offer insights into the patient's immune response and outcomes, such as local tumor control, recurrence, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Identifying and validating such biomarkers can significantly impact clinical decision-making, leading to personalized treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of research on potential biomarkers for predicting immune response and outcomes in lung cancer patients undergoing thermal ablation, including their potential role in lung cancer management, and the challenges and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xin Ye
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Lung Cancer Institute, Shandong Key Laboratory of Rheumatic Disease and Translational Medicine, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|