CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB): A thoracic surgeon's learning curve and experience summary

Comparison Between Endobronchial-Guided Transbronchial Biopsy and Computed Tomography-Guided Transthoracic Lung Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Central Pulmonary Lesions

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors at present. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy, complication rates, and predictive values of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) and electronic bronchoscopy-guided transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) for patients with central pulmonary lesions (CPLs) with a diameter ≥ 3 cm.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 110 patients with CPLs with a diameter ≥ 3 cm who underwent preoperative PTNB and TBLB examinations and ultimately underwent surgery to remove CPLs and obtained pathological results. Detailed information was collected in order to compare whether there was a difference between two groups. Data were processed using SPSS software (Version 26.0; IBM Corp). Data were compared by t-test or chi-square test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

All patients underwent surgical treatment at the department of thoracic surgery and obtained a final pathological diagnosis. The rate of positive predictive value (PPV) was comparable between the two methods, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was significantly higher in the PTNB group compared with the TBLB group (p < 0.05). In addition, PTNB was more sensitive and accurate than TBLB (p < 0.05). However, the PTNB group had a higher probability of complications, and TBLB was a relatively safer examination method.

CONCLUSION

PTNB demonstrated a higher accuracy and sensitivity than TBLB in the treatment of CPLs with a diameter ≥ 3 cm, but the complication rates of PTNB are relatively high. These methods exhibited different diagnostic accuracies and therefore should be selected based on different medical conditions.

CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB): A thoracic surgeon's learning curve and experience summary

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated the learning process of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB). Here, we aimed to evaluate the number of cases required to achieve proficiency by plotting the learning curve of PTNB.

METHODS

Data were collected from 94 consecutive patients who underwent computed tomography-guided PTNB by a thoracic surgeon at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between May 2021 and February 2022. The data collected included patient information, relevant examination results, intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, and diagnostic results.

RESULTS

The inflection points of the cumulative sum curve were around cases 13 and 24, according to which three phases were identified, including phase I, phase II, and phase III. A significant downtrend was observed regarding operative time (phase I, 26.53 ± 9.13 min vs. phase III, 18.42 ± 4.29 min, p < 0.05), rate of false-negative (phase I, 15.4% vs. phase III, 5.7%; p < 0.05), rate of pneumothorax (phase I, 30.8% vs. phase III, 12.9%; p < 0.05), and rate of hemoptysis (phase I, 15.4% vs. phase III, 2.9%; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Thirteen cases were accumulated to lay the technical foundation, and 24 cases were required to achieve proficiency. In this study we summarize our own experience and provide specific guidance for young doctors with no experience in biopsy.