Externally attached biologgers cause compensatory body mass loss in birds

The dual hypothesis of homeostatic body weight regulation, including gravity-dependent and leptin-dependent actions

Body weight is tightly regulated when outside the normal range. It has been proposed that there are individual-specific lower and upper intervention points for when the homeostatic regulation of body weight is initiated. The nature of the homeostatic mechanisms regulating body weight at the lower and upper ends of the body weight spectrum might differ. Previous studies demonstrate that leptin is the main regulator of body weight at the lower end of the body weight spectrum. We have proposed that land-living animals use gravity to regulate their body weight. We named this homeostatic system the gravitostat and proposed that there are two components of the gravitostat. First, an obvious mechanism involves increased energy consumption in relation to body weight when working against gravity on land. In addition, we propose that there exists a component, involving sensing of the body weight by osteocytes in the weight-bearing bones, resulting in a feedback regulation of energy metabolism and body weight. The gravity-dependent homeostatic regulation is mainly active in obese mice. We, herein, propose the dual hypothesis of body weight regulation, including gravity-dependent actions (= gravitostat) at the upper end and leptin-dependent actions at the lower end of the body weight spectrum. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Causes of obesity: theories, conjectures and evidence (Part II)'.

The impact of shape and attachment position of biologging devices in Northern Bald Ibises

Background

The impact of biologging devices on the aerodynamics or hydrodynamics of animals is still poorly understood. This stands in marked contrast to the ever more extensive use of such technologies in wild-living animals. Recently, increasing concerns have been raised about the impairing effects of these devices on the animals concerned. In the early days of biotelemetry, attention was focused solely on reducing weight, but now aerodynamic effects are also increasingly being considered. To investigate these effects, we trained Northern Bald Ibises to fly in a wind tunnel in which we measured heart rate and dynamic body acceleration (VeDBA) as proxies for energy expenditure in relation to different logger shapes and wind flow directions.

Results

Our data provide evidence that the position of biologging devices significantly influence the flight distances, and the shape of biologging devices has a considerable effect on heart rate and VeDBA, both of which have been used as proxies for energy expenditure. Unfavorable shape and positioning go beyond merely affecting the effort required during flapping flight. The energetically probably more important effect is that the devices impair the bird's ability to glide or soar and thus force them to perform the energetically much more demanding flapping flight more frequently. This effect was more pronounced in rising air than in horizontal airflow. A complementary study with wild Northern Bald Ibises during spring migration provides evidence that the position of the devices on the bird's back affects the length of the flight stages. Birds carrying the devices on the upper back, fixed by wing-loop harnesses, had significantly shorter flight stages compared to birds with a more caudally positioned device, fixed by leg-loop harnesses.

Conclusion

The attachment of biologging devices on birds affects their performance and behavior and thus may influence their fitness and mortality. Our results show that detrimental effects can be reduced with relatively little effort, in particular through a strictly aerodynamic design of the housing and increased consideration of aerodynamics when attaching the device to the body. In birds, the attachment of biologging devices via leg loops to the lower back is clearly preferable to the common attachment via wing loops on the upper back, even if this affects the efficiency of the solar panels. Nevertheless, the importance of drag reduction may vary between systems, as the benefits of having a biologging devices close to the center of gravity may outweigh the increase in drag that this involves. Overall, more research is required in this field. This is both in the interest of animal welfare and of avoiding biasing the quality of the collected data.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40317-023-00322-5.