Genomic estimation of quantitative genetic parameters in wild admixed populations

Detecting directional and non-directional epistasis in bi-parental populations using genomic data

Epistasis, commonly defined as interaction effects between alleles of different loci, is an important genetic component of the variation of phenotypic traits in natural and breeding populations. In addition to its impact on variance, epistasis can also affect the expected performance of a population and is then referred to as directional epistasis. Before the advent of genomic data, the existence of epistasis (both directional and non-directional) was investigated based on complex and expensive mating schemes involving several generations evaluated for a trait of interest. In this study, we propose a methodology to detect the presence of epistasis based on simple inbred biparental populations, both genotyped and phenotyped, ideally along with their parents. Thanks to genomic data, parental proportions as well as shared parental proportions between inbred individuals can be estimated. They allow the evaluation of epistasis through a test of the expected performance for directional epistasis or the variance of genetic values. This methodology was applied to two large multiparental populations, i.e. the American maize and soybean nested association mapping populations, evaluated for different traits. Results showed significant epistasis, especially for the test of directional epistasis, e.g. the increase in anthesis to silking interval observed in most maize inbred progenies or the decrease in grain yield observed in several soybean inbred progenies. In general, the effects detected suggested that shuffling allelic associations of both elite parents had a detrimental effect on the performance of their progeny. This methodology is implemented in the EpiTest R-package and can be applied to any bi/multiparental inbred population evaluated for a trait of interest.

Segregation between breeds and local breed proportions in genetic and genomic models for crossbreds

BACKGROUND

The breeding value of a crossbred individual can be expressed as the sum of the contributions from each of the contributing pure breeds. In theory, the breeding value should account for segregation between breeds, which results from the difference in the mean contribution of loci between breeds, which in turn is caused by differences in allele frequencies between breeds. However, with multiple generations of crossbreeding, how to account for breed segregation in genomic models that split the breeding value of crossbreds based on breed origin of alleles (BOA) is not known. Furthermore, local breed proportions (LBP) have been modelled based on BOA and is a concept related to breed segregation. The objectives of this study were to explore the theoretical background of the effect of LBP and how it relates to breed segregation and to investigate how to incorporate breed segregation (co)variance in genomic BOA models.

RESULTS

We showed that LBP effects result from the difference in the mean contribution of loci between breeds in an additive genetic model, i.e. breed segregation effects. We found that the (co)variance structure for BS effects in genomic BOA models does not lead to relationship matrices that are positive semi-definite in all cases. However, by setting one breed as a reference breed, a valid (co)variance structure can be constructed by including LBP effects for all other breeds and assuming them to be correlated. We successfully estimated variance components for a genomic BOA model with LBP effects in a simulated example.

CONCLUSIONS

Breed segregation effects and LBP effects are two alternative ways to account for the contribution of differences in the mean effects of loci between breeds. When the covariance between LBP effects across breeds is included in the model, a valid (co)variance structure for LBP effects can be constructed by setting one breed as reference breed and fitting an LBP effect for each of the other breeds.

Reduced within-population quantitative genetic variation is associated with climate harshness in maritime pine

How evolutionary forces interact to maintain genetic variation within populations has been a matter of extensive theoretical debates. While mutation and exogenous gene flow increase genetic variation, stabilizing selection and genetic drift are expected to deplete it. To date, levels of genetic variation observed in natural populations are hard to predict without accounting for other processes, such as balancing selection in heterogeneous environments. We aimed to empirically test three hypotheses: (i) admixed populations have higher quantitative genetic variation due to introgression from other gene pools, (ii) quantitative genetic variation is lower in populations from harsher environments (i.e., experiencing stronger selection), and (iii) quantitative genetic variation is higher in populations from heterogeneous environments. Using growth, phenological and functional trait data from three clonal common gardens and 33 populations (522 clones) of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Aiton), we estimated the association between the population-specific total genetic variances (i.e., among-clone variances) for these traits and ten population-specific indices related to admixture levels (estimated based on 5165 SNPs), environmental temporal and spatial heterogeneity and climate harshness. Populations experiencing colder winters showed consistently lower genetic variation for early height growth (a fitness-related trait in forest trees) in the three common gardens. Within-population quantitative genetic variation was not associated with environmental heterogeneity or population admixture for any trait. Our results provide empirical support for the potential role of natural selection in reducing genetic variation for early height growth within populations, which indirectly gives insight into the adaptive potential of populations to changing environments.

Spatial variation in the evolutionary potential and constraints of basal metabolic rate and body mass in a wild bird

An organism's energy budget is strongly related to resource consumption, performance, and fitness. Hence, understanding the evolution of key energetic traits, such as basal metabolic rate (BMR), in natural populations is central for understanding life-history evolution and ecological processes. Here we used quantitative genetic analyses to study evolutionary potential of BMR in two insular populations of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). We obtained measurements of BMR and body mass (M_b ) from 911 house sparrows on the islands of Leka and Vega along the coast of Norway. These two populations were the source populations for translocations to create an additional third, admixed 'common garden' population in 2012. With the use of a novel genetic group animal model concomitant with a genetically determined pedigree, we differentiate genetic and environmental sources of variation, thereby providing insight into the effects of spatial population structure on evolutionary potential. We found that the evolutionary potential of BMR was similar in the two source populations, whereas the Vega population had a somewhat higher evolutionary potential of M_b than the Leka population. BMR was genetically correlated with M_b in both populations, and the conditional evolutionary potential of BMR (independent of body mass) was 41% (Leka) and 53% (Vega) lower than unconditional estimates. Overall, our results show that there is potential for BMR to evolve independently of M_b , but that selection on BMR and/or M_b may have different evolutionary consequences in different populations of the same species.