Predicting haemorrhage in pre-hospital traumatic patients: evaluation of the novel heart-to-arm time index

Effects of experimental hypovolemia and pain on pre-ejection period and pulse transit time in healthy volunteers

Trauma patients may suffer significant blood loss, and noninvasive methods to diagnose hypovolemia in these patients are needed. Physiologic effects of hypovolemia, aiming to maintain blood pressure, are largely mediated by increased sympathetic nervous activity. Trauma patients may however experience pain, which also increases sympathetic nervous activity, potentially confounding measures of hypovolemia. Elucidating the common and separate effects of the two stimuli on diagnostic methods is therefore important. Lower body negative pressure (LBNP) and cold pressor test (CPT) are experimental models of central hypovolemia and pain, respectively. In the present analysis, we explored the effects of LBNP and CPT on pre‐ejection period and pulse transit time, aiming to further elucidate the potential use of these variables in diagnosing hypovolemia in trauma patients. We exposed healthy volunteers to four experimental sequences with hypovolemia (LBNP 60 mmHg) or normovolemia (LBNP 0 mmHg) and pain (CPT) or no pain (sham) in a 2 × 2 fashion. We calculated pre‐ejection period and pulse transit time from ECG and ascending aortic blood velocity (suprasternal Doppler) and continuous noninvasive arterial pressure waveform (volume‐clamp method). Fourteen subjects were available for the current analyses. This experimental study found that pre‐ejection period increased with hypovolemia and remained unaltered with pain. Pulse transit time was reduced by pain and increased with hypovolemia. Thus, the direction of change in pulse transit time has the potential to distinguish hypovolemia and pain.

Out-of-hospital Circulatory Measures to Identify Patients With Serious Injury: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to systematically identify and summarize out-of-hospital measures of circulatory compromise as diagnostic predictors of serious injury, focusing on measures usable by emergency medical services to inform field triage decisions.

METHODS

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane databases from 1996 through August 2017 for published literature on individual circulatory measures in trauma. We reviewed reference lists of included articles for additional relevant citations. Measures of diagnostic accuracy included sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Indicators of serious injury included resource need, serious anatomic injury, and mortality. We pooled estimates when data permitted.

RESULTS

We identified 114 articles, reporting results of 111 studies. Measures included systolic blood pressure (sBP), heart rate (HR), shock index (SI), lactate, base deficit, and HR variability. Pooled out-of-hospital sensitivity estimates were sBP < 90 mm Hg = 19% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12% to 29%), HR ≥ 110 beats/min = 28% (95% CI = 20% to 37%), SI > 0.9 = 37% (95% CI = 22% to 56%), and lactate > 2.0 mmol/L = 74% (95% CI = 48% to 90%). Pooled specificity estimates were sBP < 90 mm Hg = 95% (95% CI = 91% to 97%), HR ≥ 110 beats/min = 85% (95% CI = 74% to 91%), SI > 0.9 = 85% (95% CI = 72% to 92%), and lactate > 2.0 mmol/L = 62% (95% CI = 51% to 72%). Pooled AUROCs included sBP = 0.67 (95% CI = 0.58 to 0.75), HR = 0.67 (95% CI = 0.56 to 0.79), SI = 0.72 (95% CI = 0.66 to 0.77), and lactate = 0.77 (95% CI = 0.67 to 0.82). Strength of evidence was low to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Out-of-hospital circulatory measures are associated with poor to fair discrimination for identifying trauma patients with serious injuries. Many seriously injured patients have normal circulatory measures (low sensitivity), but when present, the measures are highly specific for identifying patients with serious injuries.