Trauma care in a combined rural and urban region: an observational study

Needs assessment of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in patients with major haemorrhage: a cross-sectional study

Background

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) can be used as an adjunct treatment in traumatic abdominopelvic haemorrhage, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms, postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), gastrointestinal bleeding and iatrogenic injuries during surgery. This needs assessment study aims to determine the number of patients eligible for REBOA in a typical Norwegian population.

Methods

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study based on data obtained from blood bank registries and the Norwegian Trauma Registry for the years 2017–2018. Patients who received ≥4 units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) within 6 hours and met the anatomical criteria for REBOA or patients with relevant Abbreviated Injury Scale codes with concurrent hypotension or transfusion of ≥4 units of PRBCs within 6 hours were identified. A detailed two-step chart review was performed to identify potentially eligible REBOA candidates. Descriptive data were collected and compared between subgroups using non-parametric tests for statistical significance.

Results

Of 804 patients eligible for inclusion, 53 patients were regarded as potentially REBOA eligible (corresponding to 5.7 per 100 000 adult population/year). Of these, 19 actually received REBOA. Among the identified eligible patients, 44 (83%) had a non-traumatic aetiology. Forty-two patients (79%) were treated at a tertiary care hospital. Fourteen (78%) of the REBOA procedures were due to PPH.

Conclusion

The number of patients potentially eligible for REBOA after haemorrhage is low, and most cases are non-traumatic. Most patients were treated at a tertiary care hospital. The exclusion of non-traumatic patients results in a substantial underestimation of the number of potentially REBOA-eligible patients.

Evaluation of trauma resources in rural northern Alberta identifies opportunities for improvement

Background

The care of rural trauma patients in northern Alberta can be extremely challenging because of the vast geographic area, the limited access to health care facilities and the lack of adequate resources to manage severe injuries. Identifying gaps in equipment and personnel in rural centres can provide opportunities for improving the care of injured patients in these environments. We conducted a survey based on Canadian Accreditation Council quality indicators to evaluate trauma infrastructure and human resources in rural centres across northern Alberta.

Methods

A standardized survey was developed to assess the availability of trauma-specific equipment and personnel across the prehospital and emergency department (ED) settings. The survey was distributed to 50 peripheral hospitals biannually from January 2017 to September 2018. Two-tailed paired t tests were used to evaluate changes in survey responses; a p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The survey response rate was 100%. By the end of the study period, there were significant improvements in the number of providers (p = 0.04), nurses (p = 0.01) and dedicated trauma resuscitation bays (p = 0.04) in the ED for managing injured patients. There were also significant increases in the availability of equipment, including advanced airway management tools (p = 0.02), rapid infusion devices (p = 0.02) and warmers (p = 0.04). Access to x-ray equipment (p = 0.03) and computed tomography (CT) scanners (p = 0.04) as well as equipment to support telehealth and teleconferencing (p = 0.04) increased during the study period. Access to, and supply of, blood products also increased significantly (p = 0.02) during the study period.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that the trauma resources of rural health care centres may be evaluated in a standardized fashion centres, and the results point to opportunities to remedy gaps in equipment and personnel. Our methods may be applied to any trauma network that serves geographically large areas with a sparse distribution of health care facilities, to provide critical information for the optimization of resources in rural trauma.

Epidemiology of paediatric trauma in Norway: a single-trauma centre observational study

Background

Trauma is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in children globally. The burden of injury shows substantial geographical differences, with a significant mortality reduction in children in Norway during the last four decades. The aim was to describe the current epidemiology, resource use and outcome for all potential severely injured paediatric patients admitted to a Norwegian trauma centre.

Methods

This was a single-centre retrospective observational study. All patients aged 0–17 years received by a trauma team between 01 January 2004 and 31 December 2016 (13 years) at St. Olav’s University Hospital were included. Severe injury was defined as Injury Severity Score > 15.

Results

A total of 873 patients were included, of which 536 (61%) were male. The median age was 13 years (IQR 7–16). Six per cent (n = 52) of the patients were transferred from other hospitals. Blunt trauma constituted 98%, with traffic (n = 532/61%) and falls (n = 233/27%) as the most common mechanisms. Eight patients (1%) died within 30 days of hospital admission. Fifteen per cent (n = 128) were severely injured. Among the patients transferred from another hospital, 46% (n = 24) had severe injuries. Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) were more used in younger age groups and in patients more severely injured.

Conclusions

In a developed healthcare system, the number of potentially severely injured children is small and with very few deaths following trauma. Transport and falls represent the most common causes of injury throughout all age groups, though with a tendency towards more transport-related injuries with increasing age. In-hospital trauma care is characterized by a low threshold for a multidisciplinary reception, low use of intensive care and need for emergency surgical procedures, though with increased need in the older children.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12245-019-0236-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Incidence and mortality of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in children: A ten year population-based cohort study in Norway

OBJECTIVE

In this study we wanted to estimate population-based rates of incidence and mortality of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in children in one specific region in Norway.

METHODS

In the region there are seven acute care hospitals (ACHs) in addition to a Level 1 trauma centre. Of 702 869 inhabitants (2014), 145 395 were children aged 0-16 years. Data were collected during ten years (2004-2014). All children aged 0-16 years with moderate (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 9-13) or severe (GCS score ≤ 8) TBI admitted to the Level 1 trauma centre were prospectively included. Children treated outside the Level 1 trauma centre were retrospectively included from the ACHs. Children who died from TBI prehospitally were included from the National Cause of Death Registry. Poisson regression was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (with a 95% confidence interval) comparing age, sex, and time periods.

RESULTS

A total of 71 children with moderate or severe TBI were identified. Crude incidence rates were 2·4 (95% CI 1·7-3·3) for moderate and 2·5 (95% CI 1·8-3·4) for severe TBI per 100 000 person-years (py). Mortality rate from TBI was 1·2 (95% CI 0·7-1·9) per 100 000 py, and 88% were prehospital deaths.

CONCLUSION

The incidence rates and mortality of moderate and severe TBI were low compared to international reports. Most likely explained by successful national prevention of TBI.

Population-based analysis of the impact of trauma on longer-term functional outcomes

BACKGROUND

Functional outcome measures are important as most patients survive trauma. The aim of this study was to describe the long-term impact of trauma within a healthcare region from a social perspective.

METHODS

People active in work or education and admitted to hospitals in Central Norway in the interval 1 June 2007 to 31 May 2010 after sustaining trauma were included in the study. Clinical data were linked to Norwegian national registers of cause of death, sickness and disability benefits, employment and education. Primary outcome measures were receipt of medical benefits and time to return to preinjury work level. Secondary outcome measures were mortality within 30 days or during follow-up.

RESULTS

Some 1191 patients were included in the study, of whom 193 (16·2 per cent) were severely injured (Injury Severity Score greater than 15). Five years after injury, the prevalence of medical benefits was 15·6 per cent among workers with minor injuries, 22·3 per cent in those with moderate injuries and 40·5 per cent among workers with severe injuries. The median time after injury until return to work was 1, 4 and 11 months for patients with minor, moderate and severe injuries respectively. Twelve patients died within 30 days and an additional 17 (1·4 per cent) during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Patients experiencing minor or major trauma received high levels of medical benefits; however, most recovered within the first year and resumed preinjury work activity. Patients with severe trauma were more likely to receive medical benefits and have a delayed return to work. Registration number: NCT02602405 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Evaluating the ability of a trauma team activation tool to identify severe injury: a multicentre cohort study

Background

Sensitive decision making tools should assist prehospital personnel in the triage of injured patients, identifying those who require immediate lifesaving interventions and safely reducing unnecessary under- and overtriage. In 2014 a new trauma team activation (TTA) tool was implemented in Central Norway. The overall objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of the new TTA tool to identify severe injury.

Methods

This was a multi-center observational cohort study with retrospective data analysis. All patients received by trauma teams at seven hospitals in Central Norway between 01.01.2015 to 31.12.2015 were included. Severe injury was defined as Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15. Overtriage was defined as the rate of patients with TTA and ISS < 15, whilst patients with TTA and ISS > 15 were defined as correctly triaged.

Results

A total of 1141 patients were identified, of which 998 were eligible for triage criteria analysis. Median age was 35 years (IQR 20–58) and the male proportion was 67%. Mechanism of injury was predominantly blunt trauma (96%) with transport related accidents (62%) followed by falls (22%) the most common. Overall, median injury severity score (ISS) was low and severely injured patients (ISS > 15) comprised 13% of the cohort. Utility of specific TTA criteria were: physiology 20%, anatomical injury 21%, mechanism of injury (MOI) 53% and special causes 6%. Overtriage among all patients was 87%, and for those with physiologic criteria 66%, anatomical injury 82%, mechanism of injury 97% and special causes criteria 92%, respectively.

Conclusions

Severe injury was infrequent and there was a substantial rate of overtriage. The ability of the TTA tool was relatively insensitive in identifying severe injury, but showed increased performance when utilizing physiologic and anatomical injury criteria. Many of the TTA mechanism of injury criteria might be considered for removal from the triage tool due to substantial rates of overtriage. This has relevance for the proposed development of national Norwegian TTA criteria.