Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment in a low-volume and geographically isolated cardiothoracic centre

Annual hospital procedural volume and outcome in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure

BACKGROUND

The hospital mortality of patients suffering from pulmonary failure requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) or extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂ R) is high. It is unclear whether outcome correlates with a hospital's annual procedural volume.

METHODS

Data on all V-V ECMO and ECCO₂ R cases treated from 2007 to 2019 was retrieved from the German Institute for Medical Documentation and Information. Comorbidities and outcomes were assessed by DRG, OPS, and ICD codes. The study population was divided into 5 groups depending on annual hospital V-V ECMO and ECCO₂ R volumes (<10 cases; 10-19 cases; 20-29 cases; 30-49 cases; ≥50 cases). Primary outcome was hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 25,096 V-V ECMO and 3,607 ECCO₂ R cases were analyzed. V-V ECMO hospitals increased from 89 in 2007 to 214 in 2019. Hospitals handling <10 cases annually increased especially (64 in 2007 to 149 in 2019). V-V ECMO cases rose from 807 in 2007 to 2,597 in 2019. Over 50% were treated in hospitals handling ≥30 cases annually. Hospital mortality was independent of the annual hospital procedural volume (55.3%; 61.3%; 59.8%; 60.2%; 56.3%, respectively, p=0.287). We detected no differences when comparing hospitals handling <30 cases to those with ≥30 annually (p=0.659). The numbers of ECCO₂ R hospitals and cases has dropped since 2011 (287 in 2007 to 48 in 2019). No correlation between annual hospital procedural volume and hospital mortality was identified (p=0.914).

CONCLUSION

The number of hospitals treating patients requiring V-V ECMO and V-V ECMO cases rose from 2007 to 2019, while ECCO₂ R hospitals and their case numbers decreased. We detected no correlation between annual hospital V-V ECMO or ECCO₂ R volume and hospital mortality.

Human factors in ECLS - A keystone for safety and quality - A narrative review for ECLS providers

INTRODUCTION

Although the technology used for extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has improved greatly in recent years, the application of these devices to the patient is quite complex and requires extensive training of team members both individually and together. Human factors is an area that addresses the activities, contexts, environments, and tools which interact with human behavior in determining overall system performance.

HYPOTHESIS

Analyses of the cognitive behavior of ECLS teams and individual members of these teams with respect to the occurrence of human errors may identify additional opportunities to enhance safety in delivery of ECLS.

RESULTS

The aim of this article is to support health-care practitioners who perform ECLS, or who are starting an ECLS program, by establishing standards for the safe and efficient use of ECLS with a focus on human factor issues. Other key concepts include the importance of ECLS team leadership and management, as well as controlling the environment and the system to optimize patient care.

CONCLUSION

Expertise from other industries is extrapolated to improve patient safety through the application of simulation training to reduce error propagation and improve outcomes.