An iliopsoas plane block does not cause motor blockade-A blinded randomized volunteer trial

Pericapsular nerve group block: a 3D CT scan imaging study to determine the spread of injectate

BACKGROUND

Current understanding of the mechanism of action of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is primarily based on cadaver studies. We performed an imaging study in patients undergoing hip surgery to enhance the understanding of the analgesic mechanisms following a PENG block.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

10 patients scheduled for hip surgery received an ultrasound-guided PENG block with 18 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine mixed with 2 mL of a contrast agent. After completion of the block, a high-resolution CT scan was performed to obtain a three-dimensional reconstruction of the injectate's dispersion.

RESULTS

The CT imaging revealed that injectate was mainly confined to the epimysium of the iliacus and the psoas muscle, with a minor spread to the hip capsule. Contrast dye was detected within the iliacus and/or the psoas muscle in all patients. No observed spread to either the subpectineal plane or the obturator foramen was detected.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the analgesic effect of the PENG block may be related to the block of the branches of the femoral nerve traveling within the iliopsoas muscle without a spread pattern commensurate with the block of the obturator nerve.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT06062134).

Iliopsoas plane block does not improve pain after primary total hip arthroplasty in the presence of multimodal analgesia: a single institution randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The clinical analgesic efficacy of iliopsoas plane block remains a subject of discussion. This study aimed to assess the analgesic efficacy of iliopsoas plane block under general anesthesia using multimodal analgesia.

METHODS

Fifty-six adult patients who underwent elective primary hip arthroplasty were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either a single-shot iliopsoas plane block (10 mL 0.75% ropivacaine with 1:200 000 epinephrine) or a sham block (10 mL normal saline). All patients received general anesthesia, multimodal analgesia (preoperative buprenorphine patch, 5 µg/h), intraoperative intravenous dexamethasone (8 mg) and nefopam (20 mg), and round-the-clock acetaminophen and celecoxib. The primary outcome was the numeric rating scale pain score at rest 6 hour after surgery.

RESULTS

Iliopsoas plane block did not have a notable advantage over the sham block in terms of pain relief at rest, as assessed by the numeric rating scale score, 6 hour after total hip arthroplasty (iliopsoas plane block: median, 4.0; IQR, 2.0-5.8; sham: median, 5.5; IQR, 2.3-6.8; median difference, -1.0; 95% CI -2.0 to 0.0; p≥0.999). Linear mixed model analysis showed no differences in pain scores, opioid consumption, quadriceps strength, or quality of recovery between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Iliopsoas plane block did not improve postoperative analgesia following total hip arthroplasty under general anesthesia with a multimodal analgesic regimen. The blockade of sensory femoral branches supplying the anterior hip capsule using iliopsoas plane block may not yield additional benefits concerning patient outcomes in the aforementioned clinical context.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05212038, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05212038.

Efficacy of iliopsoas plane block for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy: a prospective, triple-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative stretching of the hip joint capsule often generates severe pain during the first 3 hours after hip arthroscopy. The short-lived severe pain mandates high opioid consumption, which may result in adverse events and delay recovery. The femoral nerve nociceptors are located anteriorly in the hip joint capsule. A femoral nerve block reduces pain and opioid demand after hip arthroscopy. It impedes, however, ambulation and home discharge after outpatient surgery. The iliopsoas plane block selectively anesthetizes the femoral sensory nerve branches innervating the hip joint capsule without compromising ambulation. We aimed to assess reduction of opioid consumption after iliopsoas plane block during the short-lived painful postsurgical period of time after hip arthroscopy.

METHODS

In a randomized, triple-blind trial, 50 patients scheduled for hip arthroscopy in general anesthesia were allocated to active or placebo iliopsoas plane block. The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the first three postoperative hours in the postanesthesia care unit. Secondary outcomes included pain, nausea, and ability to ambulate.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were analyzed for the primary outcome. The mean 3-hour intravenous morphine equivalent consumption in the iliopsoas plane block group was 10.4 mg vs 23.8 mg in the placebo group (p<0.001). No intergroup differences were observed for the secondary outcomes during the postoperative follow-up.

CONCLUSION

An iliopsoas plane block reduces opioid consumption after hip arthroscopy. The reduction of opioid consumption during the clinically relevant 3-hour postsurgical period of time was larger than 50% for active versus placebo iliopsoas plane block in this randomized, triple-blind trial.

A randomized controlled trial of iliopsoas plane block vs. femoral nerve block for hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Iliopsoas plane block (IPB) is a novel analgesic technique for hip surgery that retains quadriceps strength. However, evidence from randomized controlled trial is remains unavailable. We hypothesized that IPB, as a motor-sparing analgesic technique, could match the femoral nerve block (FNB) in pain management and morphine consumption, providing an advantage for earlier functional training in patients underwent hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

We recruited ninety patients with femoral neck fracture, femoral head necrosis or hip osteoarthritis who were scheduled for unilateral primary hip arthroplasty were recruited and received either IPB or FNB. Primary outcome was the pain score during hip flexion at 4 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included quadriceps strength and pain scores upon arrival at post anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 2, 4, 6, 24, 48 h after surgery, the first time out of bed, total opioids consumption, patient satisfaction, and complications.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in terms of pain score during hip flexion at 4 h after surgery between the IPB group and FNB group. The quadriceps strength of patients receiving IPB was superior to those receiving FNB upon arrival at PACU and at 2, 4, 6 and 24 h after surgery. The IPB group showed a shorter first time out of bed compared to the FNB group. However, there were no significant differences in terms of pain scores within 48 h after surgery, total opioids consumption, patient satisfaction and complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

IPB was not superior to FNB in terms of postoperative analgesia for hip arthroplasty. However, IPB could serve as an effective motor-sparing analgesic technique for hip arthroplasty, which would facilitate early recovery and rehabilitation. This makes IPB worth considering as an alternative to FNB.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200055493; registration date: January 10, 2022; enrollment date: January 18, 2022; https://www.chictr.org.cn/searchprojEN.html ).

A Systematic Review of the Usage of Lidocaine in Hip Replacement Surgery

Hip replacement procedures, professionally known as hip arthroplasty, are one of the most common orthopedic procedures. Due to the variation in this procedure, the use and types of anesthetics differ. One such commonly used anesthetic is lidocaine. Since there are currently no standardized or general procedures for the application of lidocaine for perioperative hip arthroplasty procedures, this review aims to delve into this topic. A literature review surrounding the key terms "hip replacement" and "lidocaine" was performed on PubMed. After reviewing 24 randomized control trials, statistical analyses between groups that had no lidocaine versus groups that did were performed. The results showed that there was no statistical significance between various age groups and the use of lidocaine. One percent (1%) and 2% injected into the lumbar region were the most commonly reported doses of lidocaine, with 2% often being the first test dose. Other conclusions were that lidocaine was used for general anesthesia for individuals that underwent hip arthroplasty due to an underlying condition (cauda equina syndrome, ankylosing spondylitis, etc.). Lidocaine was also used for postoperative pain relief, which is a potential concern from its addictive qualities. This investigation outlines the current stance and usage of lidocaine in perioperative hip arthroplasty while noting its limitations.

Anatomical and Radiological Assessments of Injectate Spread Stratified by the Volume of the Pericapsular Nerve Group Block

BACKGROUND

The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block was recently suggested as a regional technique for managing acute pain after hip surgery. However, few anatomical studies have confirmed the spread of injectate during the PENG block. This cadaver study aimed to analyze injectate spread to the target nerves during single-injection ultrasound-guided PENG block.

METHODS

Ultrasound-guided PENG block with 3 different injectate volumes (10, 20, or 30 mL) was performed in 18 cadavers. Injectate spread by the volume was first evaluated on computed tomography, followed by cadaver dissection. The spread of the dye over the pelvis and lower limb was evaluated.

RESULTS

The articular branches of the femoral nerve were stained nearly sufficiently with 20- and 30-mL specimens. The femoral nerve itself was stained simultaneously in six of 12 (50%) 20-mL specimens and 12 of 12 (100%) 30-mL specimens. The accessory obturator nerve was observed only in three (9%) of 36 specimens. The articular branches of the obturator nerve were rarely affected, regardless of injectate volume (1/12, 10 mL specimens; 2/12, 20 mL specimens; 1/12, 30 mL specimens; P > .999). Rather, the obturator nerve was affected. However, the obturator nerve was not stained consistently even with 30 mL of injectate (50%).

CONCLUSIONS

After combining the dissection and radiological findings, the single-injection ultrasound-guided PENG blocks with volumes of 10, 20, and 30 mL do not support motor sparing or selective anterior hip capsule innervation in a clinical setting. If early rehabilitation is needed, high-volume PENG block might not be the ideal option, and persisting pain after PENG block might be attributed in part to the lack of obturator nerve articular branches blockade.

Parameters of Iliopsoas Plane Immediately Caudal to the Indirect Tendon of Rectus Femoris in Axial Plane Measured on Magnetic Resonance Images in an Adult Eastern Asian Population

The iliopsoas plane (IP) is a fascial plane deep to the iliopsoas complex and is the target of several novel ultrasound-guided analgesic interventions for hip. Currently, limited information is known about its parameters. From the pelvic magnetic resonance (MR) images of an adult Eastern Asian population (n = 49), the IP width, depth, and needle-beam angle in the axial plane immediately caudal to the level of indirect tendon of rectus femoris (RF) were found to be 10.7 ± 1.6 mm, 48.5 ± 15.5 mm, and 84.2 ± 8.2 degrees, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the age categories for IP width, and older patients seemed to have wider IP. Our data may provide applications for the technical modification of ultrasound-guided iliopsoas plane block (IPB) in acute hip pain management and the future development of ultrasound-guided single-needle-entry radiofrequency neuroablation in chronic hip pain management.

New ultrasound-guided capsular blocks for hip surgery: A narrative review

Surgery on the hip joint is very common. Improving pain management has been and is one of the fundamental pillars to optimize the functional recovery of patients. To do this, we must design a multimodal anesthetic-analgesic plan that covers the entire perioperative period. Peripheral nerve blocks and fascial blocks are an important component of multimodal analgesic strategies. Traditional blocks have moderate efficacy, prolonged motor impairment, and increased risk of falls. As an alternative, capsular blocks ("ileopsoas plane block" or "IPB" and pericapsular nerve group block or "PENG block") have recently been described that aim to avoid motor impairment while maintaining optimal analgesic efficacy. The objective of this review is to describe the new capsular blocks and to analyze whether they allow to improve postoperative analgesia and promote functional recovery with fewer complications, based on the innervation of the hip. To do this, a bibliographic review was carried out in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from January 2018 to June 2020.

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block and Iliopsoas Plane Block: A Scoping Review of Quadriceps Weakness after Two Proclaimed Motor-Sparing Hip Blocks

Iliopsoas plane (IP) is a fascial plane deep to the iliopsoas complex that can serve as a potential space for the injection of local anesthetics to selectively block the articular branches of femoral nerve and accessory obturator nerve to the anterior hip capsule. Two highly similar ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks that target the IP, pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and iliopsoas plane block (IPB), were both designed to achieve motor-sparing sensory block to the anterior hip capsule. However, the most recent evidence shows that PENG block can cause 25% or more of quadriceps weakness, while IPB remains the hip block that can preserve quadriceps strength. In this scoping review of quadriceps weakness after PENG block and IPB, we first performed a focused review on the complicated anatomy surrounding the anterior hip capsule. Then, we systematically searched for all currently available cadaveric and clinical studies utilizing PENG block and IPB, with a focus on quadriceps weakness and its potential mechanism from the perspectives of fascial plane spread along and outside of the IP. We conclude that quadriceps weakness after PENG block, which places its needle tip directly deep to iliopsoas tendon (IT), may be the result of iliopectineal bursal injection. The incidental bursal injection, which can be observed on ultrasound as a medial fascial plane spread, can cause bursal rupture/puncture and an anteromedial extra-IP spread to involve the femoral nerve proper within fascia iliaca compartment (FIC). In comparison, IPB places its needle tip lateral to IT and injects just one-fourth of the volume of PENG block. The current evidence, albeit still limited, supports IPB as the true motor-sparing hip block. To avoid quadriceps weakness after PENG block, a more laterally placed needle tip, away from the undersurface of IT, and a reduction in injection volume should be considered. Future studies should focus on comparing the analgesic effects and quadriceps function impairment between PENG block and IPB.

A Preliminary Analysis of a Modified Anterior Approach to Hip Pericapsular Neurolysis for Inoperable Hip Fracture Using the IDEAL Framework

Introduction: With an increasingly ageing population, there is a growing impact of fragility hip fracture on the healthcare system and on society as a whole. Oral and injectable analgesics are often insufficient whilst traction and regional blocks do not allow patients to be discharged easily. While the conventional approach of ultrasound-guided anterior hip pericapsular neurolysis can help a lot of inoperable hip fracture patients to relieve their fracture pain and facilitate subsequent nursing care, enormous technical challenges are encountered in some cases. In this retrospective case study, we evaluated the overall pain and functional outcomes of our modified approach of anterior hip pericapsular neurolysis for inoperable hip fractures using the IDEAL framework. Method: This retrospective case series studied patients with acute inoperable hip fracture who received the modified approach of anterior hip pericapsular neurolysis from January 2018 to June 2019 according to the IDEAL recommendations. The modified approach consisted of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) injection, iliopsoas plane infiltration, and the sagittal approach of obturator nerve articular branches (ONAB) injection. Subsequent alcohol neurolysis would be performed in the same setting if there were positive diagnostic blocks. Assessments were carried out on post-intervention day 5. The primary outcome was pain intensity during hip flexion at 80 degrees in the recumbent position and during gentle hip internal and external rotation using an appropriate pain scoring tool. The secondary outcomes were the range of tolerable hip flexion and occurrence of any lower limb neurological deficit because of the procedure. Interim outcomes were also briefly evaluated. Results: Among the 74 patients who were reviewed in the study period, the median dynamic pain at hip flexion 80° (p < 0.001) and on gentle hip external and internal rotation (p < 0.001) was significantly reduced from a composite score of 3 (severe pain) to 1 (mild pain) on post-intervention day 5 after the modified approach of hip neurolysis. This translated to 72% of patients achieving satisfactory pain control, which was defined as a composite pain score of ≤1 on hip flexion at 80°. Functionally, the mean range of tolerable hip flexion significantly improved from 39.7° at baseline to 74° on post-intervention day 5 (p < 0.001). Transient and reversible hypotension was seen in about 10% of the patients. No other major procedural adverse event was noted. Interim follow-up at 4−6 months post-intervention revealed that more than 95% of patients continued to have satisfactory dynamic pain control (i.e., composite pain score ≤ 1). According to the IDEAL classification, this study could be ranked as stage 2a (development). Conclusions: Our findings suggested that anterior hip pericapsular neurolysis using a modified approach could offer consistent and satisfactory analgesic and functional benefits to a majority of patients with inoperable hip fractures during the interim of the fracture healing process, and it was potentially safer than the conventional approach. This technique might have achieved its readiness to proceed to the next stage of research according to the IDEAL framework.

Analgesic effect of iliopsoas plane block for hip fracture

Background

Hip fracture and surgery are associated with moderate to severe pain, which hampers early mobilization and extends the hospital stay. Femoral nerve block and fascia iliaca compartment block could provide effective postoperative pain relief. Unfortunately, they could weaken the strength of the quadriceps muscle and increase the risk of falls. Iliopsoas plane block (IPB) is a novel motor-sparing regional technique, which targets the sensory branches of the hip joint originating from the femoral nerve. However, the analgesic effect of IPB has not been confirmed yet.

Case presentation

In the present case series, IPB and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block were implemented under the guidance of ultrasound for eight patients with hip fractures. The median (IQR) visual analog scale (VAS) score (0–10; 0: no pain, 10: worst pain) decreased from 1.5 (0.25–2) before IPB to 0 (0–0) 0.5h after IPB at rest. The median (IQR) VAS score decreased from 8 (7–8) before IPB to 2 (1–2) 0.5h after IPB during flexion of hip 30°. Pain score was no more than one at rest and three during flexion of the hip 30° within 48h after surgery. Furthermore, the MMT grades of quadriceps strength were no less than four after IPB.

Conclusions

Our case series firstly highlights that IPB might be an effective analgesic technique for hip fracture and surgery, while retaining motor function.

Fascial plane blocks: a narrative review of the literature

Fascial plane blocks (FPBs) are increasingly numerous and are often touted as effective solutions to many perioperative challenges facing anesthesiologists. As 'new' FPBs are being described, questions regarding their effectiveness remain unanswered as appropriate studies are lacking and publications are often limited to case discussions or technical reports. It is often unclear if newly named FPBs truly represent a novel intervention with new indications, or if these new publications describe mere ultrasound facilitated modifications of existing techniques. Here, we present broad concepts and potential mechanisms of FPB. In addition, we discuss major FPBs of (1) the extremities (2) the posterior torso and (3) the anterior torso. The characteristics, indications and a brief summary of the literature on these blocks is included. Finally, we provide an estimate of the overall level of evidence currently supporting individual approaches as FPBs continue to rapidly evolve.

Selective periarticular blocks for postoperative pain after hip and knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to provide an overview of selective periarticular blocks for postoperative pain after hip and knee arthroplasty and the current evidence for their use.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most interventional analgesia techniques for hip and knee arthroplasty result in a motor block and muscle weakness. Therefore, these are not well suited for fast-track protocols. In contrast, selective pericapsular infiltration techniques provide selective joint sensory block without an associated motor block. This facilitates postoperative pain management and avoids impairing ambulation and early rehabilitation.

SUMMARY

The pericapsular blocks of the hip (pericapsular nerve group block, iliopsoas plane block, hip block), genicular nerves block, and infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee play an increasingly important role in providing postoperative analgesia after hip and knee arthroplasty without impeding fast-track protocols.

Surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures in high-risk geriatric patients under peripheral regional anesthesia : A prospective feasibility study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Due to changing demographics geriatric patients with multiple comorbidities and proximal femoral fractures are an increasing patient population. In these patient groups, peripheral regional anesthesia could become increasingly more important besides established procedures, such as neuraxial or general anesthesia. The aim of this single center feasibility study was to evaluate a combined blockade technique of the lumbosacral plexus for three predefined subgroups depending on the type of hip fracture.

METHODS

We used a unilateral double injection three-step technique to block the sacral (parasacral block) and lumbar plexus (anterior quadratus lumborum and psoas compartment block, n = 78). The blockade was performed both under ultrasound guidance and simultaneous nerve stimulation and 20 ml ropivacaine 0.375% was injected at each of the 3 injection sites (total dose 225 mg).

RESULTS

In 42% of cases the surgery was opioid-free (n = 33). In 5 patients a conversion to general anesthesia (insertion of a laryngeal mask and pressure-controlled or pressure-supported ventilation) was necessary (6%). The overall success rate of combination anesthesia (peripheral nerve blocks with supplemental sedative (propofol 1-2 mg/kg*h) or analgesic (incremental doses of 5 µg sufentanil) medication) was 94%, regardless of fracture type and surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

The combined anesthetic technique presented in this study enables surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures. The associated effort and requirement for expert knowledge in regional anesthesia indicates that this method should be considered especially in cases with high anesthetic risk, suitable sonoanatomy, and non-compromised coagulation.

Peripheral nerve blocks for analgesia after elective total hip arthroplasty

A significant subgroup of patients suffer from moderate or severe pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Regional analgesia has the potential to reduce post-operative pain and thereby spare patients from opioids, but regional analgesia of the hip is complicated as the area is innervated by multiple nerves. However, the nociceptors of the hip joint are primarily innervated by the obturator and femoral nerves. The effect of an obturator nerve block (ONB) on pain following THA has never been investigated. A femoral nerve block is known to reduce pain after THA, but is unfortunately accompanied by an increased risk of fall. We have developed a novel nerve block-the iliopsoas plane block (IPB)-that has the potential to anaesthetize the hip articular sensory branches of the femoral nerve without causing motor blockade.