Femoral nerve blocks for the treatment of acute pre-hospital pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Regional Anesthesia in the Austere Environment: Lessons Learned from Current Out-of-Hospital Practice

INTRODUCTION

Pain management for trauma in the extreme environment is vital for both casualty comfort and aiding safe extrication. However, adequate pain management in a resource-limited environment can be challenging and is often limited. We conducted a scoping review of the use of regional anesthesia in the prehospital environment, evaluating which regional anesthetic procedure was performed for various indications, their efficacy, and the type of healthcare provider delivering the anesthetic.

METHODS

A PRISMA-guided systematic literature review was conducted of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies reporting the use of regional anesthesia in the prehospital environment published before June 30, 2022.

RESULTS

Thirty studies met the criteria and were included in the review. The most common types of regional anesthesia were fascia-iliaca compartment block (n = 317, from 12 studies) and femoral nerve block (n = 210, from 8 studies), along with various other blocks for a range of indications. These blocks had good efficacy and a low-risk profile and could be delivered by a wide range of healthcare providers.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional anesthesia is an effective and non-resource-heavy pain management tool in prehospital environments, which may be applicable to austere settings. It can cover a wide range of injuries and can avoid systemic complications for casualties that may already be challenging to manage in out-of-hospital settings. Additionally, regional anesthesia can be effectively delivered by a wide range of providers. This review provides a holistic summary of pain management using regional anesthesia in the prehospital environment, with a discussion on its potential use in more extreme settings.

[Regional Anaesthesia in the Prehospital Setting]

Pain is often the main symptom in trauma patients. Although peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) provide fast, safe, and adequate analgesia, they are currently only rarely used outside the perioperative setting. In Germany, intravenous analgesia with non-opioid analgesics (NOPA) and strong opioids is the main treatment concept for prehospital pain. However, the use of highly potent opioids can be associated with significant side effects, especially in emergency patients. Therefore, PNBs are used in many hospitals for the treatment of perioperative pain. As with perioperative use, the advantages of early PNB in the prehospital analgesic treatment of trauma patients are obvious, especially for elderly and multimorbid patients. Early prehospital PNB can also facilitate the reduction of dislocated fractures or dislocated joints as well as the technical rescue of trauma patients. Common geriatric fractures, such as proximal femur or humerus fractures, can be treated appropriately and adequately with PNB.In this article, we show which PNB procedures can be useful in prehospital patient care and which requirements should be met for their safe use. We also present a concept for assessing whether and to what extent the prehospital use of PNB is indicated and appropriate. The aim of this article is to draw attention to PNB as a possible part of prehospital care concepts for trauma patients and to discuss its prehospital use.

[Peripheral Regional Anesthesia Techniques - Standards in Flux?!]

This review article provides an overview of current developments in peripheral regional anaesthesia (RA). The authors present a subjective compilation based on discussions at professional events and inquiries to the Working Group on Regional Anaesthesia of the German Society for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI). The article addresses several relevant topics, including the handling of antithrombotic medication in peripheral blockades with reference to European guidelines, the debate on the discharge timing after plexus anaesthesia, and the consideration of rebound pain as an independent pain entity following RA.Furthermore, the contentious discussion regarding the administration of peripheral nerve blockades under general anaesthesia is illuminated. The authors express no fundamental concerns in this regard but emphasize the importance of preoperative evaluation and individual patient needs. The question of mixing local anaesthetics is also addressed, with the authors critically questioning this tradition and recommending the use of individual, long-acting substances.Another focal point is the application of peripheral nerve blockades in emergency medicine, both in preclinical and emergency room settings. The authors highlight the necessity for high-quality studies and discuss the complex organizational issues associated with the preclinical application of RA techniques.

Opioids for Treatment of Pre-hospital Acute Pain: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Acute pain is a frequent symptom among patients in the pre-hospital setting, and opioids are the most widely used class of drugs for the relief of pain in these patients. However, the evidence base for opioid use in this setting appears to be weak. The aim of this systematic review was to explore the efficacy and safety of opioid analgesics in the pre-hospital setting and to assess potential alternative therapies.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Scopus, and Epistemonikos databases were searched for studies investigating adult patients with acute pain prior to their arrival at hospital. Outcomes on efficacy and safety were assessed. Risk of bias for each included study was assessed according to the Cochrane approach, and confidence in the evidence was assessed using the GRADE method.

RESULTS

A total of 3453 papers were screened, of which the full text of 125 was assessed. Twelve studies were ultimately included in this systematic review. Meta-analysis was not undertaken due to substantial clinical heterogeneity among the included studies. Several studies had high risk of bias resulting in low or very low quality of evidence for most of the outcomes. No pre-hospital studies compared opioids with placebo, and no studies assessed the risk of opioid administration for subgroups of frail patients. The competency level of the attending healthcare provider did not seem to affect the efficacy or safety of opioids in two observational studies of very low quality. Intranasal opioids had a similar effect and safety profile as intravenous opioids. Moderate quality evidence supported a similar efficacy and safety of synthetic opioid compared to morphine.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence for pre-hospital opioid administration to relieve acute pain is scarce and the overall quality of evidence is low. Intravenous administration of synthetic, fast-acting opioids may be as effective and safe as intravenous administration of morphine. More controlled studies are needed on alternative routes for opioid administration and pre-hospital pain management for potentially more frail patient subgroups.

Guidelines for the acute care of severe limb trauma patients

GOAL

To provide healthcare professionals with comprehensive multidisciplinary expert recommendations for the acute care of severe limb trauma patients, both during the prehospital phase and after admission to a Trauma Centre.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 21 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e., pharmaceutical, medical devices). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of the quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised. Few recommendations remained non-graded.

METHODS

The committee addressed eleven questions relevant to the patient suffering severe limb trauma: 1) What are the key findings derived from medical history and clinical examination which lead to the patient's prompt referral to a Level 1 or Level 2 Trauma Centre? 2) What are the medical devices that must be implemented in the prehospital setting to reduce blood loss? 3) Which are the clinical findings prompting the performance of injected X-ray examinations? 4) What are the ideal timing and modalities for performing fracture fixation? 5) What are the clinical and operative findings which steer the surgical approach in case of vascular compromise and/or major musculoskeletal attrition? 6) How to best prevent infection? 7) How to best prevent thromboembolic complications? 8) What is the best strategy to precociously detect and treat limb compartment syndrome? 9) How to best and precociously detect post-traumatic rhabdomyolysis and prevent rhabdomyolysis-induced acute kidney injury? 10) What is the best strategy to reduce the incidence of fat emboli syndrome and post-traumatic systemic inflammatory response? 11) What is the best therapeutic strategy to treat acute trauma-induced pain? Every question was formulated in a PICO (Patient Intervention Comparison Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology.

RESULTS

The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 19 recommendations. Among the formalised recommendations, 4 had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 12 had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-). For 3 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in an expert advice. After two rounds of scoring and one amendment, strong agreement was reached on all the recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant agreement among experts on strong recommendations to improve practices for severe limb trauma patients.