1
|
Dutra KJ, Lazenby GB, Goje O, Soper DE. Cefazolin as the mainstay for antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with a penicillin allergy in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 231:430-436. [PMID: 38527607 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Cefazolin is the most common antibiotic used for prophylaxis in obstetrics and gynecology. Among those with a penicillin allergy, alternative antibiotics are often chosen for prophylaxis, given fears of cross-reactivity between penicillin and cefazolin. Alternative antibiotics in this setting are associated with adverse sequelae, including surgical site infection, induction of bacterial resistance, higher costs to the healthcare system, and possible Clostridium difficile infection. Given the difference in R1 side chains between penicillin and cefazolin, cefazolin use is safe and should be recommended for patients with a penicillin allergy, including those who experience Immunoglobulin E-mediated reactions such as anaphylaxis. Cefazolin should only be avoided in those who experience a history of a severe, life-threatening delayed hypersensitivity reaction manifested as severe cutaneous adverse reactions (Steven-Johnson Syndrome), hepatitis, nephritis, serum sickness, and hemolytic anemia in response to penicillin administration. In addition, >90% of those with a documented penicillin allergy do not have true allergies on skin testing. Increased referral for penicillin allergy testing should be incorporated into routine obstetric care and preoperative assessment to reduce suboptimal antibiotic prophylaxis use. More education is needed among providers surrounding penicillin allergy assessment and cross-reactivity among penicillins and cephalosporins to optimize antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetrics and gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karley J Dutra
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
| | - Gweneth B Lazenby
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Oluwatosin Goje
- Department of Subspecialties, Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - David E Soper
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sexton ME, Kuruvilla ME. Management of Penicillin Allergy in the Perioperative Setting. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:157. [PMID: 38391543 PMCID: PMC10886174 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13020157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The selection of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is challenging in patients with a history of penicillin allergy; as such, we present a literature review exploring current best practices and the associated supporting evidence, as well as areas for future research. Guidelines recommend the use of alternative agents in patients with an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction, but those alternative agents are associated with worse outcomes, including an increased risk of surgical site infection, and higher cost. More recent data suggest that the risk of cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins, particularly cefazolin, is extremely low, and that cefazolin can be used safely in most penicillin-allergic patients. Studies have therefore explored how best to implement first-line cefazolin use in patients with a penicillin allergy label. A variety of interventions, including preoperative allergy de-labeling with incorporation of penicillin skin testing, use of patient risk-stratification questionnaires, and utilization of clinician algorithms to guide antibiotic selection intraoperatively, have all been shown to significantly increase cefazolin utilization without a corresponding increase in adverse events. Further studies are needed to clarify the most effective interventions and implementation strategies, as well as to evaluate whether patients with severe delayed hypersensitivity reactions to penicillin should continue to be excluded from receipt of other beta-lactams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Elizabeth Sexton
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Merin Elizabeth Kuruvilla
- Department of Internal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ 07936, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee EY, Copaescu AM, Trubiano JA, Phillips EJ, Wolfson AR, Ramsey A. Drug Allergy in Women. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:3615-3623. [PMID: 37805007 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.09.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
Across all settings, women self-report more drug allergies than do men. Although there is epidemiologic evidence of increased drug allergy labeling in postpubertal females, the evidence base for female sex as a risk factor for true immune-mediated drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs), particularly in fatal drug-induced anaphylaxis, is low. A focus on the known immunologic mechanisms described in immediate and delayed DHR, layered on known hormonal and genetic sex differences that drive other immune-mediated diseases, could be the key to understanding biological sex variations in DHR. Particular conditions that highlight the impact of drug allergy in women include (1) pregnancy, in which a drug allergy label is associated with increased maternal and fetal complications; (2) multiple drug intolerance syndrome, associated with anxiety and depression; and (3) female-predominant autoimmune medical conditions in the context of mislabeling of the drug allergy or increased underlying risk. In this review, we describe the importance of drug allergy in the female population, mainly focusing on the epidemiology and risk, the mechanisms, and the associated conditions and psychosocial factors. By performing a detailed analysis of the current literature, we provide focused conclusions and identify existing knowledge gaps that should be prioritized for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Yue Lee
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Eliot Phillipson Clinician-Scientist Training Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ana Maria Copaescu
- Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jason A Trubiano
- Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Phillips
- Center for Drug Safety and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Centre, Nashville, Tenn; Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Anna R Wolfson
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass
| | - Allison Ramsey
- Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, NY; Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine, Department of Allergy/Immunology/Rheumatology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Massoth C, Saadat-Gilani K, Wenk M. [allergy to penicillin - no beta-lactam antibiotics?]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2023; 58:264-266. [PMID: 37044110 DOI: 10.1055/a-1933-2408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
AbstractDrug allergies are frequently reported by patients undergoing pre-anesthesia evaluation, potentially resulting in a suboptimal treatment with alternative substances. While about 10% of
patients report to be allergic to penicillin, less than 1% have a true IgE-mediated allergy. Multiple factors contribute to this large prevalence, such as misinterpretations of common
gastrointestinal side effects as “allergic”, a history of penicillin treatment for infectious mononucleosis resulting in skin rashes, uncritical acceptance of the diagnosis by medical staff
or neglect to the fact that most patients will lose their sensitivity after 10 years. In addition to this, cephalosporins are regularly withheld from patients with penicillin allergy due to
an unwarranted fear of cross-reactivity. Therefore, a correct identification of those in which penicillins or cephalosporins are truly contraindicated is paramount to avoid an unnecessary
use of antibiotics with a less favorable spectrum.
Collapse
|
5
|
Shi M, Chen L, Ma X, Wu B. The risk factors and nursing countermeasures of sepsis after cesarean section: a retrospective analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:696. [PMID: 36085040 PMCID: PMC9461153 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04982-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sepsis is a very serious complication of cesarean section, understanding the influencing factors is important to the prevention and management of sepsis. We aimed to analyze the associated risk factors of sepsis of cesarean section, to provide evidences into the clinical management and nursing care of cesarean section. Methods Patients who underwent cesarean section surgery from January 1, 2017 to June 30, 2021 in our hospital were included. The characteristics of patients were collected and analyzed. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to analyze the influencing factors of sepsis of cesarean section. Results A total of 3819 patients undergoing cesarean section were included, the incidence of sepsis in patients undergoing cesarean section was 0.84%. There were significant differences in the age, vaginal delivery attempt, premature rupture of membranes, preoperative hemoglobin, estimated blood loss during surgery and postoperative urinary tube implacement between sepsis and no sepsis patients (all p < 0.05). Logistic regression analyses found that age ≥ 35y(OR3.22, 95%CI1.20 ~ 5.15), gestational diabetes(OR2.64, 95%CI1.91 ~ 4.15), vaginal delivery attempt(OR2.05, 95%CI1.70 ~ 4.42), premature rupture of membranes(OR2.42, 95%CI1.02 ~ 4.20), preoperative hemoglobin ≤ 105 g/L(OR4.39, 95%CI1.02 ~ 7.88), estimated blood loss during surgery ≥ 400 ml(OR1.81, 95%CI1.35 ~ 3.01), postoperative urinary tube implacement(OR2.19, 95%CI1.27 ~ 2.50) were the risk factors of sepsis in patients undergoing cesarean section(all p < 0.05). Escherichia Coli(46.15%), Enterococcus faecalis(17.95%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa(12.83%) were the most commonly-seen bacteria in sepsis patients. Conclusion In clinical practice, medical workers should carry out strict management and early prevention of related risk factors during the perioperative period of pregnant women, to effectively reduce the occurrence of sepsis after cesarean section.
Collapse
|