Efficacy of a TAP block versus an anterior QLB for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: A randomised controlled trial

New Kid on the Block: A Systematic Review of the Quadratus Lumborum Block in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Background

Although the transversus abdominal plane (TAP) block is commonly used in abdominal surgery as part of enhanced recovery after surgery pathways, the quadratus lumborum (QL) block has been hypothesized as an effective alternative to the TAP block in some areas. This review evaluates the current literature, as it relates to the QL block in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Methods

A systematic review using PubMed searched for all original, peer-reviewed articles, including the term "quadratus lumborum block." In total, 509 articles were identified for review by two independent reviewers. Original articles evaluating the use of a QL block in any plastic surgery operation were included. Articles evaluating pediatric patients, animal trials, and the use of a QL block in any nonplastic surgery operation were excluded.

Results

Three articles met inclusion criteria. One trial demonstrated decreased subjective pain scores and total opioid use, whereas the second found no statistically significant difference. A case study described the use of a QL block for unilateral breast reconstruction with minimal opiate use and reduced pain scores postoperatively. Limitations include the limited number of studies and the heterogeneity in study type and design, making analysis difficult.

Conclusions

Despite its demonstrated efficacy in other surgical subspecialties, there are limited data evaluating the use of the QL block in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Additional research is needed to evaluate the role of the QL block in plastic surgery and how it compares to the more widely utilized TAP block.

Quadratus lumborum block versus transversus abdominis plane block for inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative pain management is crucial for patient recovery with Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAPB) emerging as potential techniques. We aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of QLB and TAPB in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases to identify randomized controlled trials comparing QLB and TAPB in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Outcomes included postoperative pain and opioid consumption. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. The review protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023445513).

RESULTS

We included five RCTs encompassing 255 patients. QLB was associated with a significant decrease in postoperative pain (MD -0.45; 95% CI -0.75 to -0.14; and p = 0.004; I2  = 94%). However, we found no difference in 24-h opioid consumption between QLB and TAPB groups.

CONCLUSION

QLB may offer superior pain reduction. However, its effect on opioid consumption remains unclear.

Transversus abdominis plane block vs quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The present review was designed to differentiate between the analgesic value of transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) vs the quadratus lumborum block (QLB) for patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery.

METHODS

PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, Open gray, and a clinical trial registry were searched up to 18th February 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TAP and QLB for inguinal hernia repair.

RESULTS

Six RCTs from India, Turkey, and Norway published between the years 2019 to 2023 were included. Anesthetic agents and dosages were similar for TAP and QLB groups in each study. On meta-analysis, pain scores were not statistically significant different between TAP and QLB at 3-6 h (MD: 0.46 95% CI: -0.11, 1.03 I2 = 86%), 12 h (MD: 1.34 95% CI: -0.12, 2.80 I2 = 97%), and 24 h (MD: 0.38 95% CI: -0.77, 1.53 I2 = 97%). Meta-analysis of total analgesic consumption showed a tendency of reduced analgesic consumption with QLB as compared to TAP but the difference was not significant (SMD: 0.69 95% CI: 0.00, 1.37 I2 = 83%). Data on complications was scarcely available. GRADE assessment of the evidence was low to moderate.

CONCLUSION

Low to moderate-quality preliminary evidence suggests no difference in the analgesic efficacy of TAP and QLB for adult patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. While there was a tendency for lower postoperative analgesic consumption with QLB, it needs to be verified by future studies.

Transversus abdominis plane blocks in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a review

INTRODUCTION

Throughout its history, there have been significant advances in pain control of inguinal hernia repairs. One of the most recent developments is locoregional pain blocks. There is a multitude of literature available on laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks.

OBJECTIVES

This paper seeks to provide a thorough and systematic literature review on the role of TAP blocks in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs.

METHODS

PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for relevant literature using predetermined medical subject heading (MeSH) terms: "(TAP block)" AND "(Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair)".

RESULTS

A total of 166 publications were identified, from which 18 publications were included in the final review after eligibility criteria were applied.

CONCLUSION

The majority of studies conclude that TAP blocks performed in the setting of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair improve post-operative pain and mobility, decrease opiate analgesic usage, and are superior in pain control compared to other modalities of regional anesthesia. Thus, to improve post-operative outcomes and patient satisfaction, TAP blocks should be heavily considered for routine use in surgical practice for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.