Does preexisting antiplatelet treatment influence postthrombolysis intracranial hemorrhage in community-treated ischemic stroke patients? An observational study

Antiplatelet therapy within 24 hours of tPA: lessons learned from patients requiring combined thrombectomy and stenting for acute ischemic stroke

Objective

Although stroke guidelines recommend antiplatelets be started 24 hours after tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), select mechanical thrombectomy (MT) patients with luminal irregularities or underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease may benefit from earlier antiplatelet administration.

Methods

We explore the safety of early (<24 hours) post-tPA antiplatelet use by retrospectively reviewing patients who underwent MT and stent placement for acute ischemic stroke from June 2015 to April 2018 at our institution.

Results

Six patients met inclusion criteria. Median presenting and pre-operative National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores were 14 (Interquartile Range [IQR] 5.5–17.3) and 16 (IQR 13.7–18.7), respectively. Five patients received standard intravenous (IV) tPA and one patient received intra-arterial tPA. Median time from symptom onset to IV tPA was 120 min (IQR 78–204 min). Median time between tPA and antiplatelet administration was 4.9 hours (IQR 3.0–6.7 hours). Clots were successfully removed from the internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) in 5 patients, the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) in one patient, and the vertebrobasilar junction in one patient. All patients underwent MT before stenting and achieved thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2B recanalization. Stents were placed in the ICA (n=4), common carotid artery (n=1), and basilar artery (n=1). The median time from stroke onset to endovascular access was 185 min (IQR 136–417 min). No patients experienced symptomatic post-procedure intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Median modified Rankin Scale score on discharge was 3.5.

Conclusions

Antiplatelets within 24 hours of tPA did not result in symptomatic ICH in this series. The safety and efficacy of early antiplatelet administration after tPA in select patients following mechanical thrombectomy warrants further study.

Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients Receiving Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 19 Studies

BACKGROUND

The safety and long-term outcome of systemic thrombolysis in patients receiving antiplatelet medications remain subjects of great clinical significance. The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine how prestroke antiplatelet therapy affects the risks and benefits of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A dual-reviewer search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE databases through November 2015, from which 19 studies involving a total of 108 588 patients with acute ischemic stroke were identified based on preset inclusion criteria. Information on study designs, patient characteristics, exposures, outcomes, and adjusting confounders was extracted, and estimates were combined by using random-effects models. The pooled crude estimates suggested that taking long-term antiplatelet medications was associated with higher odds of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] 1.70, 95% CI 1.47-1.97) and death (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.22-1.75) and lower odds of favorable functional outcomes (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.93). However, the combined confounder-adjusted results only confirmed a relatively weak positive association between prior antiplatelet therapy and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02-1.44) and demonstrated no significant relationship between antiplatelet therapy and the other 2 outcomes (favorable outcome OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.96-1.24; death OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.98-1.07). Subgroup analyses revealed that the associations between prestroke antiplatelet therapy and outcomes were dependent on time and antiplatelet agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving long-term antiplatelet medications were associated with greater risks of developing symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after systemic thrombolysis. However, the overall independent association between prestroke antiplatelet therapy and unfavorable outcomes or mortality was insignificant.

Prior Antiplatelet Agent Use and Outcomes after Intravenous Thrombolysis with Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

There is uncertainty surrounding the influence of prior antiplatelet agent use on outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke.

Aim

We performed a systematic review with a final meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prior antiplatelet use before intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke.

Summary of review

We searched PubMed and Embase databases from 1997 to 2014. Primary outcome was functional outcome at the end of follow-up; secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and recanalization rate. The meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5·2 (Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012). Eleven studies with a total of 19 453 patients were included. A total of 6517 (33·5%) patients who had received intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator were taking antiplatelet agent before stroke onset. Pooled analysis demonstrated a clear trend that previous anti-platelet users had a reduced probability of good outcome, although it was not conventionally statistically significant (OR 0·86; 95% CI 0·73–1·01; P = 0·06). There was no difference in recanalization rate between two groups (OR 1·23; 95% CI 0·30–4·99; P = 0·77). The risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was significantly increased in the antiplatelet group (OR 1·65; 95% CI 1·44–1·90; P < 0·01).

Conclusions

In acute ischemic stroke patients receiving intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator therapy, prior antiplatelet agent use did not lead to a significant difference in functional outcome, although it significantly increased the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Recanalization rate was not different between two groups. In the subgroup analysis, prior clopidogrel mono therapy may not increase the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, which will need further studies to confirm.

Preexisting dual antiplatelet treatment increases the risk of post-thrombolysis intracranial hemorrhage in Chinese stroke patients

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have shown conflicting results on the use of antiplatelet (AP) agent and its risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) following thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Our study was to explore the safety of intravenous (IV) thrombolysis in Chinese stroke patients who were on AP prior to stroke.

METHODS

Data were collected from the thrombolysis implementation and monitor of acute ischemic stroke in China (TIMS-China) registry. Symptomatic ICH defined per SITS-MOST (safe implementation of treatments in stroke-monitoring study), ECASS II (second European-Australasian acute stroke study), and NINDS (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke) criteria, 90-day functional outcome, and 7-day and 90-day mortalities were compared between the stroke patients who were on mono and dual AP therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 157 (14.2%) patients received at least one AP drug within 24 hours before thrombolysis. Patients with preexisting dual AP treatment had higher rate of sICH (14.3% (2/14) per SITS-MOST, 21.4% (3/14) per ECASS II definitions) than those on no AP treatment. No significant difference was found in the rate of sICH or 7-day or 90-day mortalities between the groups on aspirin (ASA) alone and on no AP treatment.

DISCUSSION

The risk of developing sICH is low when thrombolysis is given to patients who are on ASA alone. However, there is potential increased risk of sICH if a patient is on dual AP treatment.