Computed tomography with intravenous contrast alone: the role of intra-abdominal fat on the ability to visualize the normal appendix in children

Comparing Accuracy of Night Radiology Interpretations for Pediatric Trauma: Radiology Residents Versus Attending Teleradiologists

Background: Overnight radiology coverage for pediatric trauma patients (PTPs) is addressed with a combination of on-call radiology residents (RRs) and/or attending teleradiologists (ATs); however, the accuracy of these two groups has not been investigated for PTPs. We aimed to compare the accuracy of RRs vs AT interpretations of computed tomography (CT) scans for PTPs. Methods: Pediatric trauma patients (<18 years old) at a single level-I adult/level-II pediatric trauma center were studied in a retrospective analysis (3/2019-5/2020). Computed tomography scans interpreted by both RRs and ATs were included. Radiology residents were compared to ATs for time to interpretation (TTI) and accuracy compared to faculty attending radiologist interpretation, using the validated RADPEER scoring system. Additionally, RR and AT accuracies were compared to a previously studied adult cohort during the same time-period. Results: 42 PTPs (270 interpretations) and 1053 adults (8226 interpretations) were included. Radiology residents had similar rates of discrepancy (13.3% vs 13.3%), major discrepancy (4.4% vs 4.4%), missed findings (9.6% vs 12.6%), and overcalls (3.7% vs .7%) vs ATs (all P > .05). Mean TTI was shorter for RRs (55.9 vs 90.4 minutes, P < .001). Radiology residents had a higher discrepancy rate for PTPs (13.3% vs 7.5%, P = .01) than adults. Attending teleradiologists had a similar discrepancy rate for PTPs and adults (13.3% vs 8.9%, P = .07). Discussion: When interpreting PTP CT imaging, RRs had similar discrepancy rates but faster TTI than ATs. Radiology residents had a higher discrepancy rate for PTP CTs than RR interpretation of adult patients, indicating both RRs and ATs need more focused training in the interpretation of PTP studies.

Computed tomographic manifestations of celiac ganglia between hypertensive and non-hypertensive population

The celiac ganglion (CG) is associated with the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of hypertension. The characteristics of the CG in patients with hypertension remain unknown. The aim of our study was to explore the differences in celiac ganglia (CGs) characteristics between hypertensive and non-hypertensive populations using computed tomography (CT). CGs manifestations on multidetector row CT in 1003 patients with and without hypertension were retrospectively analyzed. The morphological characteristics and CT values of the left CGs were recorded. The CT values of the ipsilateral adrenal gland (AG) and crus of the diaphragm (CD) were also measured. The left CG was located between the left AG and CD, and most CGs were long strips. The frequency of visualization of the left CGs was higher in the hypertension group than in the non-hypertension group (p < .05). There were no significant differences in the maximum diameter, size, and shape ratio of the left CGs between the two groups (p > .05). Except for the left CG in the arterial phase, the CT values of the left CG and AG in the non-hypertensive group were higher than those in the hypertension group (p < .05). The venous phase enhancement of the left CG in the non-hypertension group was significantly higher than that in the hypertension group (p < .05). Our findings reveal that CGs have characteristic manifestations in the hypertensive population. As important targets of the SNS, CGs have the potential to regulate blood pressure.

Practical Imaging Strategies for Acute Appendicitis in Children

OBJECTIVE

Diagnosing pediatric appendicitis is difficult because clinical findings are nonspecific. Improved accuracy can be obtained with ultrasound (US), CT, or MRI, despite considerable variation in their use at different institutions. This article reviews the evidence for best practices in imaging pediatric appendicitis.

CONCLUSION

When each modality is optimally used, a stepwise imaging approach that begins with graded compression US and proceeds to CT or MRI in select cases is currently best practice.

Visibility of Normal Appendix on CT, MRI, and Sonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study is to assess the visibility of the normal appendix on CT, MRI, or ultrasound (US) images of a healthy population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched to identify articles on the rates of detection of a normal appendix on CT, MRI, or US that appeared in the literature published up to January 20, 2017. Pooled detection rates were assessed using random-effects modeling, and rates associated with different imaging modalities were compared. Meta-regression analyses were performed to assess factors influencing detection rates and heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies (21 CT studies with 5296 patients, 7 MRI studies with 600 patients, and 4 US studies with 1221 patients) were included in our meta-analysis. The overall normal appendix detection rate tended to be highest for CT (84%), followed by US (71%) and MR (69%), but no statistically significant differences were noted (for CT vs MRI, p = 0.16; for CT vs US, p = 0.23; and for MRI vs US, p = 0.91). Meta-regression analyses of the appendix detection rate with CT revealed that the year of publication of the study, the number of CT channels, and slice thickness affected study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Normal appendixes seemed to be more visible on CT than on MRI or US, although this finding did not have statistical significance. With respect to CT, detection of normal appendixes was significantly better when more channels and thinner slices were used.

Using Body Mass Index and Bioelectric Impedance Analysis to Assess the Need for Positive Oral Contrast Agents Before Abdominopelvic CT

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether body fat percentage, measured using a portable handheld bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) device, and body mass index (BMI, weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) can estimate the amount of intraabdominal and intrapelvic fat and thereby predict the need for oral contrast material before abdominopelvic CT.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A prospective, institutional review board-approved study consisting of 101 patients who presented to the emergency department of a level I trauma center was conducted between June 1, 2016, and July 19, 2016. A medical student calculated patients' BMI and obtained body fat measurements from a handheld BIA device. Three fellowship-trained and board-certified radiologists who were blinded to the collected data then assigned a score of 1-5 on the basis of the amount of intraabdominal and intrapelvic fat seen on CT images. A McNemar test was used to compare overall sensitivity and specificity of this method, and a weighted Fleiss kappa score was used to determine interobserver variability between the three radiologists.

RESULTS

Nearly all (97%) of the patients with high BMI (BMI ≥ 25) had sufficient amounts of intraabdominal and intrapelvic fat to allow delineation of anatomic structures without the use of oral contrast material. Of the patients with low BMI (BMI ≤ 21), 83% had inadequate amounts of fat to separate intraabdominal and intrapelvic structures. For patients with intermediate BMIs (21 < BMI < 25), BIA-determined body fat percentage of 30% or more can be used to predict whether a patient will have sufficient intraabdominal and intra-pelvic fat to obviate oral contrast material for CT.

CONCLUSION

Using BIA in addition to BMI accurately predicts amount of intraabdominal and intrapelvic fat. This information may help guide the decision to use oral contrast material in patients presenting for abdominopelvic CT.

Body composition determinants of radiation dose during abdominopelvic CT

Objectives

We designed a prospective study to investigate the in-vivo relationship between abdominal body composition and radiation exposure to determine the strongest body composition predictor of dose length product (DLP) at CT.

Methods

Following institutional review board approval, quantitative analysis was performed prospectively on 239 consecutive patients who underwent abdominopelvic CT. DLP, BMI, volumes of abdominal adipose tissue, muscle, bone and solid organs were recorded.

Results

All measured body composition parameters correlated positively with DLP. Linear regression (R² = 0.77) revealed that total adipose volume was the strongest predictor of radiation exposure [B (95% CI) = 0.027(0.024–0.030), t=23.068, p < 0.001]. Stepwise linear regression using DLP as the dependent and BMI and total adipose tissue as independent variables demonstrated that total adipose tissue is more predictive of DLP than BMI [B (95% CI) = 16.045 (11.337-20.752), t=6.681, p < 0.001].

Conclusions

The volume of adipose tissue was the strongest predictor of radiation exposure in our cohort.

Main message

• Individual body composition variables correlate with DLP at abdominopelvic CT.

• Total abdominal adipose tissue is the strongest predictor of radiation exposure.

• Muscle volume is also a significant but weaker predictor of DLP.

Pediatric CT dose reduction for suspected appendicitis: a practice quality improvement project using artificial gaussian noise--part 2, clinical outcomes

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a nominal 50% reduction in median absorbed radiation dose on sensitivity, specificity, and negative appendectomy rate of CT for acute appendicitis in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS. On the basis of a departmental practice quality improvement initiative using computer-generated gaussian noise for CT dose reduction, we applied a nominal dose reduction of 50% to abdominal CT techniques used for bowel imaging. This retrospective study consisted of 494 children who underwent a CT for suspected acute appendicitis before (n = 244; mean age, 133 months) and after (n = 250; mean age, 145 months) the nominal 50% dose reduction. Test performance characteristics of CT for acute appendicitis and impact on the negative appendectomy rate were compared for both time periods. Primary analyses were performed with histologic diagnosis as the outcome standard. Volume CT dose index and dose-length product were recorded from dose reports and size-specific dose estimates were calculated. RESULTS. The nominal 50% dose reduction resulted in an actual 39% decrease in median absorbed radiation dose. Sensitivity of CT for diagnosis of acute appendicitis was 98% (95% CI, 91-100%) versus 97% (91-100%), and specificity was 93% (88-96%) versus 94% (90-97%) before and after dose reduction, respectively. The negative appendectomy rate was 4.5% (0.8-10.25%) before dose reduction and 4.0% (0.4-7.6%) after dose reduction. CONCLUSION. The negative appendectomy rate and performance characteristics of the CT-based diagnosis of acute appendicitis were not affected by a 39% reduction in median absorbed radiation dose.