1
|
Broder JS, Oliveira J E Silva L, Bellolio F, Freiermuth CE, Griffey RT, Hooker E, Jang TB, Meltzer AC, Mills AM, Pepper JD, Prakken SD, Repplinger MD, Upadhye S, Carpenter CR. Guidelines for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department 2 (GRACE-2): Low-risk, recurrent abdominal pain in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2022; 29:526-560. [PMID: 35543712 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
This second Guideline for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department (GRACE-2) from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine is on the topic "low-risk, recurrent abdominal pain in the emergency department." The multidisciplinary guideline panel applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations regarding four priority questions for adult emergency department patients with low-risk, recurrent, undifferentiated abdominal pain. The intended population includes adults with multiple similar presentations of abdominal signs and symptoms recurring over a period of months or years. The panel reached the following recommendations: (1) if a prior negative computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) has been performed within 12 months, there is insufficient evidence to accurately identify populations in whom repeat CTAP imaging can be safely avoided or routinely recommended; (2) if CTAP with IV contrast is negative, we suggest against ultrasound unless there is concern for pelvic or biliary pathology; (3) we suggest that screening for depression and/or anxiety may be performed during the ED evaluation; and (4) we suggest an opioid-minimizing strategy for pain control. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The GRACE-2 writing group developed clinically relevant questions to address the care of adult patients with low-risk, recurrent, previously undifferentiated abdominal pain in the emergency department (ED). Four patient-intervention-comparison-outcome-time (PICOT) questions were developed by consensus of the writing group, who performed a systematic review of the literature and then synthesized direct and indirect evidence to formulate recommendations, following GRADE methodology. The writing group found that despite the commonality and relevance of these questions in emergency care, the quantity and quality of evidence were very limited, and even fundamental definitions of the population and outcomes of interest are lacking. Future research opportunities include developing precise and clinically relevant definitions of low-risk, recurrent, undifferentiated abdominal pain and determining the scope of the existing populations in terms of annual national ED visits for this complaint, costs of care, and patient and provider preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua S Broder
- Department of Surgery, Division of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Fernanda Bellolio
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Caroline E Freiermuth
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Richard T Griffey
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Emergency Care Research Core, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Edmond Hooker
- Department of Health Services Administration, Xavier University, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Timothy B Jang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, UCLA Santa Monica Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
| | - Andrew C Meltzer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Angela M Mills
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.,Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Des Plaines, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | - Michael D Repplinger
- BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Suneel Upadhye
- Division of Emergency Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher R Carpenter
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Emergency Care Research Core, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Des Plaines, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Morotti A, Goldstein JN. Diagnosis and Management of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2016; 34:883-899. [PMID: 27741993 DOI: 10.1016/j.emc.2016.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the deadliest type of stroke and up to half of patients die in hospital. Blood pressure management, coagulopathy reversal, and intracranial pressure control are the mainstays of acute ICH treatment. Prevention of hematoma expansion and minimally invasive hematoma evacuation are promising therapeutic strategies under investigation. This article provides an updated review on ICH diagnosis and management in the emergency department.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Morotti
- J. P. Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 175 Cambridge Street, Suite 300, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Joshua N Goldstein
- J. P. Kistler Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 175 Cambridge Street, Suite 300, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Zero Emerson Place, Suite 3B, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marchick MR, Allen BR, Weeks EC, Shuster JJ, Elie MC. The incidence and significance of acute kidney injury following emergent contrast administration in patients with STEMI and stroke. Intern Emerg Med 2016; 11:853-7. [PMID: 26910240 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-016-1407-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2015] [Accepted: 02/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The authors have investigated the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and short-term mortality following an activated STEMI and stroke alert at a tertiary referral and academic center. A single center, retrospective chart review of STEMI and stroke activation patients from January 2010 to March 2012. Data was collected and reviewed from an institutional database following IRB-approval. Inclusion criteria were STEMI patients taken for cardiac catheterization, excluding patients receiving hemodialysis due to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Primary outcome measures were the incidence of AKI using the RIFLE criteria and short-term mortality. 745 patients were included (488 stroke, 257 STEMI). The median age was 65, and 39 % were female. Overall inpatient mortality was 7.0 %. 5.4 % (40/745) of patients experienced some degree of AKI (8.6 % of STEMI, 3.7 % of stroke patients). Overall, 30 % of patients with AKI died during their hospitalization. AKI was associated with a 7.1-fold (95 % CI 3.4-15.1) increase in mortality in the entire cohort. Among STEMI patients, AKI was associated with a 66.6-fold (95 % CI 12.9-343.4) increase in mortality. These findings follow similar trends published among critically ill patients with AKI. The risk of death with concomitant AKI in this hospital population is significant and deserves future study. Early recognition and awareness in the emergency department is paramount to the patient's survival. Future studies should focus on modalities to improve early recognition and preventative therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Robert Marchick
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1329 SW 16th Street, PO Box 100186, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
| | - Brandon Russell Allen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1329 SW 16th Street, PO Box 100186, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Emily Cassin Weeks
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1329 SW 16th Street, PO Box 100186, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Jonathan Jacob Shuster
- Department of Health Outcomes and Policy Biostatistics Epidemiology and Research Design, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1329 SW 16th Street, PO Box 100186, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Marie-Carmelle Elie
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1329 SW 16th Street, PO Box 100186, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Courtney DM, Mills AM, Marin JR. To test or not to test … decision analysis of decision support. Acad Emerg Med 2015; 22:594-6. [PMID: 25900106 DOI: 10.1111/acem.12663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D. Mark Courtney
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Feinberg School of Medicine; Northwestern University; Chicago IL
| | - Angela M. Mills
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Perelman School of Medicine; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia PA
| | - Jennifer R. Marin
- Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Pittsburgh PA
| |
Collapse
|