The effect of fat emulsion on hemodynamics following treatment with propranolol and clonidine in anesthetized rats

Low-Dose Propranolol Prevents Functional Decline in Catecholamine-Induced Acute Heart Failure in Rats

Severe hyper-catecholaminergic states likely cause heart failure and cardiac fibrosis. While previous studies demonstrated the effects of beta-blockade in experimental models of single-catecholamine excess states, the detailed benefits of beta-blockade in more realistic models of hyper-adrenergic states are less clearly understood. In this study, we examined different therapeutic dosages and the effects of propranolol in rats with hyper-acute catecholamine-induced heart failure, and subsequent cardiopulmonary changes. Rats (n = 41) underwent a 6 h infusion of epinephrine and norepinephrine alone, with additional low-dose (1 mg/kg) or high-dose propranolol (10 mg/kg) at hour 1. Cardiac and pulmonary tissues were examined after 6 h. Catecholamine-only groups had the lowest survival rate. Higher doses of propranolol (15 mg/kg) caused similarly low survival rates and were not further analyzed. All low-dose propranolol rats survived, with a modest survival improvement in the high-dose propranolol groups. Left ventricular (LV) systolic pressure and LV end-diastolic pressure improved maximally with low-dose propranolol. Cardiac immunohistochemistry revealed an LV upregulation of FGF-23 in the catecholamine groups, and this improved in low-dose propranolol groups. These results suggest catecholamine-induced heart failure initiates early pre-fibrotic pathways through FGF-23 upregulation. Low-dose propranolol exerted cardio-preventative effects through FGF-23 downregulation and hemodynamic-parameter improvement in our model of hyper-acute catecholamine-induced heart failure.

Heterogeneity and bias in animal models of lipid emulsion therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Clinicians utilize lipid emulsion to treat local anesthetic toxicity and non-local anesthetic toxicities, a practice supported by animal experimentation and clinical experience. Prior meta-analysis confirmed a mortality benefit of lipid emulsion in animal models of local anesthetic toxicity but the benefit of lipid emulsion in models of non-local anesthetic toxicity remains unanswered. Further, swine suffer an anaphylactoid reaction from lipid emulsions calling into question their role as a model system to study lipid, so we examined swine and non-swine dependent outcomes in models of intravenous lipid emulsion.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the use of lipid emulsion therapy in animal models of cardiac toxicity. We quantified mortality using a random-effects odds-ratio method. Secondary outcomes included survival in the following subgroups: local-anesthetic systemic toxicity, non-local anesthetic toxicity, swine-based models, and non-swine models (e.g., rat, rabbit and dog). We assessed for heterogeneity with Cochran's Q and I². We examined bias with Egger's test & funnel plot analysis.

RESULTS

Of 2784 references screened, 58 met criteria for inclusion. Treatment with lipid emulsion reduced chance of death in all models of toxicity with an odds ratio of death of 0.26 (95% CI 0.16-0.44, Z-5.21, p < 0.00001, Cohen's-d = 0.72, n = 60). Secondary outcomes confirmed a reduced chance of death in models of local anesthetic toxicity (OR 0.16 {95% CI 0.1-0.33}) and non-local anesthetic toxicity (OR 0.43 {95% CI 0.22-0.83}). Heterogeneity (Cochran's Q 132 {df = 59, p < 0.01}, I ² = 0.55) arose primarily from animal-model and disappeared (I ² < = 0.12) when we analyzed swine and non-swine subgroups independently. Swine only benefited in models of local anesthetic toxicity (OR 0.28 {95% CI 0.11-0.7}, p = 0.0033) whereas non-swine models experienced a homogeneous benefit across all toxins (OR 0.1 {95% CI 0.06-0.16}, p < 0.00001). Egger's test identified risk of bias with outliers on funnel plot analysis.

DISCUSSION

Lipid emulsion therapy reduces mortality in animal models of toxicity. Heterogeneity arises from the animal-model used. Swine only benefit in models of local anesthetic toxicity, potentially due to lipid dose, experimental design or swine's anaphylactoid reaction to lipid. Outlier analysis reinforced the need for appropriate dosing of lipid emulsion along with airway management and chest compressions in the setting of cardiac arrest.

Low dose Intralipid resuscitation improves survival compared to ClinOleic in propranolol overdose in rats

Background

Medication overdose is a prevalent issue and despite mixed reports of efficacy, the use of intravenous lipid emulsions, notably Intralipid^®, for the management of toxicity from lipid-soluble drugs is becoming increasingly prevalent. Whether alternative lipid emulsion formulations have similar efficacy for resuscitation compared to Intralipid is not known. Here, we compared the efficacy of Intralipid and ClinOleic^® for resuscitation following overdose with the lipid-soluble beta-adrenergic antagonist propranolol.

Methods

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (age 3–4 months) were anesthetized with isoflurane and instrumented for direct hemodynamic assessments. In Study One, rats (n = 22) were pre-treated with Intralipid 20% (n = 12) or ClinOleic 20% (n = 10) to determine whether the hemodynamic effects of propranolol could be prevented. In Study Two, rats were randomly assigned to Intralipid 20% (1, 2, or 3 mL/kg IV, n = 21) or ClinOleic 20% (1, 2, or 3 mL/kg IV, n = 20) resuscitation groups following propranolol overdose (15 mg/kg IV). In Study Three the effect of Intralipid 20% (1 mL/kg IV, n = 3) and ClinOleic 20% (1 mL/kg IV, n = 3) in the absence of propranolol was investigated. The primary endpoint in all studies was survival time (up to a maximum of 120 minutes), and secondary endpoints were time to achieve 50%, 75%, and 90% of baseline hemodynamic parameters.

Results

In Study One, pre-treatment with Intralipid prior to propranolol administration resulted in prolonged survival compared to pre-treatment with ClinOleic at low doses (1 mL/kg; P = 0.002), but provided no benefit at higher doses (3 mL/kg; P = 0.95). In Study Two, Intralipid conferred a survival advantage over ClinOleic, with 18/21 rats surviving 120 minutes in the Intralipid group and only 4/20 survivors in the ClinOleic group (P<0.0001). Median survival times (with interquartile ranges) for rats treated with Intralipid, and ClinOleic, and saline were 120 (80.5–120) min, 21.5 (3.25–74.5) min, and 1 (0.25–2.5) min respectively (P<0.001). Only 3/21 rats in the Intralipid group survived less than 30 minutes, whereas 12/20 ClinOleic treated rats had survival times of less than 30 minutes. The number of rats achieving 75%, and 90% of baseline mean arterial pressure was also greater in the Intralipid group (P<0.05 for both values). Treatment in Study Three did not alter survival times.

Conclusions

Low-dose Intralipid (1, 2, or 3 mL/kg IV) confers a survival advantage up to 120 minutes post-propranolol overdose (the end-point of the experiment) and better hemodynamic recovery compared to ClinOleic (1, 2, or 3 mL/kg IV) in rats with propranolol overdose. As health care centres choose alternate intravenous lipid emulsions, limited availability of Intralipid could impact efficacy and success of overdose treatment for lipid-soluble drugs.