The Frequency of Postreduction Interventions After Successful Enema Reduction of Intussusception

Practice variation in the management of pediatric intussusception: a narrative review

Ileocolic intussusception, a major cause of acute intestinal obstruction in young children, necessitates rapid diagnosis and a multidisciplinary treatment approach. A recent large study identified variations in pain management, sedation, and non-operative reduction methods in these patients. We aimed to explore variability within the diagnostic and treatment pathways of ileocolic intussusception. A narrative review of the literature was conducted for peer-reviewed articles published in English between 2004 and 2024. We searched the electronic databases Ovid, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database. Google Scholar was searched using the search terms "intussusception," "triage," "diagnosis," emergency department," "radiology," "ultrasound," "POCUS," "reduction," "air-enema," "fluid-enema," "pneumatic," "hydrostatic," "pain," "sedation," "operating-room," "laparoscopy," and "surgery" to identify articles published in electronic journals, books, and scientific websites. Data were analyzed by a multidisciplinary team of specialists in pediatric emergency medicine, pediatric radiology, and pediatric surgery. Fifty-six papers were included in this review. Six areas of practice variation were found: pain management in triage, the use of point-of-care ultrasound in the emergency department, the use of pneumatic versus hydrostatic technique for the reduction procedure, performing the reduction procedure under sedation, patient observation after an uncomplicated reduction, and the use of open surgery or laparoscopy for patients who underwent unsuccessful reduction.

CONCLUSION

This review has identified practice variations in several key areas of ileocolic intussusception management. The findings underscore the need for further research in these areas and the establishment of uniform standards aimed at improving the care of children with ileocolic intussusception.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Ileocolic intussusception necessitates rapid diagnosis and a collaborative treatment approach involving emergency medicine, radiology, surgery, and often anesthesia. • A previous study reported variations in the practice of pain management and sedation among these patients.

WHAT IS NEW

• This narrative review identified practice variations in several key areas within the diagnostic and treatment pathways of ileocolic intussusception.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of the Need for Surgical Treatment in Children's Intussusception

OBJECTIVE

 Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an emerging inflammatory marker in abdominal pathologies. Ileocolic intussusception (ICI) involves a progressive intestinal inflammation, and the effectiveness of nonsurgical treatment (enema) might be related to the inflammation degree, although no previous studies have investigated this relationship. Our aim is to identify predictors of the need for surgical treatment in ICI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A single-center, retrospective, case-control study was performed in children with ICI, who were treated with initial nonsurgical management between 2005 and 2019. Patients were divided in two groups: A (effective enema) and B (need for surgery). Admission demographic and clinical and laboratory data were analyzed. Specificity and sensitivity of the different parameters as predictors of the need for surgical treatment were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

 A total of 511 patients were included (410: group A; 101: group B), without statistically significant demographic differences. Group B presented significantly higher frequency of vomiting, bloody stools, and longer median time since symptoms onset (24 vs. 8 hours; p < 0.001). Group B presented higher median laboratory inflammatory markers than group A: NLR (6.8 vs. 1.8; p < 0.001), neutrophils (10,148 vs. 7,468; p < 0.001), and C-reactive protein (CRP; 28.2 vs. 4.7; p < 0.001). In ROC curve analysis, NLR had an area under the curve of 0.925, higher than neutrophil count (0.776; p = 0.001), CRP (0.670; p = 0.001), and time since symptoms onset (0.673; p = 0.001). It was estimated a cut-off point of NLR greater than 4.52 (sensitivity: 73.2%; specificity: 94.5%).

CONCLUSION

 High NLR values imply a high degree of bowel inflammation and might anticipate the need for surgical treatment in ICI in children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

 III.

Early discharge after nonoperative management of intussusception is both safe and cost-effective

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

We implemented a quality improvement (QI) initiative to safely reduce post-reduction monitoring for pediatric patients with ileocolic intussusception. We hypothesized that there would be decreased length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs, with no change in intussusception recurrence rates.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of pediatric ileocolic intussusception patients who underwent successful enema reduction at a tertiary-care pediatric hospital from January 2015 through June 2020. In September 2017, an intussusception management protocol was implemented, which allowed discharge within four hours of reduction. Pre- and post-QI outcomes were compared for index encounters and any additional encounter beginning within 24 h of discharge. An economic evaluation was performed with hospital costs inflation-adjusted to 2020 United States Dollars ($). Cost differences between groups were assessed using multivariable regression, adjusting for Medicaid and transfer status, P < 0.05 significant.

RESULTS

Of 90 patients, 37(41%) were pre-QI and 53(59%) were post-QI. Patients were similar by age, sex, race, insurance status, and transfer status. Pre-QI patients had a median LOS of 23.4 h (IQR: 16.1-34.6) versus 9.3 h (IQR 7.4-14.2) for post-QI patients, P < 0.001. Mean total costs per patient in the pre-QI group were $3,231 (95% CI, $2,442-$4,020) versus $1,861 (95% CI, $1,481-$2,240) in the post-QI group. The mean absolute cost difference was $1,370 less per patient in the post-QI group (95% CI, [-$2,251]-[-$490]). Five patients had an additional encounter within 24 h of discharge [pre-QI: 1 (3%) versus post-QI: 4 (8%), p = 0.7] with four having intussusception recurrence [pre-QI: 1 (3%) versus post-QI: 3 (6%), p = 0.6].

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a quality improvement initiative for the treatment of pediatric intussusception reduced hospital length of stay and costs without negatively affecting post-discharge encounters or recurrence rates. Similar protocols can easily be adopted at other institutions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective comparative treatment study.

Effectiveness of the implementation of pediatric intussusception clinical pathway: A pre- and postintervention trial

Intussusception is common among children at the pediatric emergency department (ED) with acute abdomen. Diagnosis and treatment delay remain a challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of intussusception clinical pathways (CPs) implementation, including bedside point-of-care ultrasonography, on patient management in a pediatric ED.In January 2017, an intussusception management protocol was implemented for children with symptoms of intussusception. We retrospectively examined the charts of patients diagnosed with intussusception during the preprotocol (January 2015 to December 2016) and postprotocol (January 2017 to January 2019) periods and compared their outcomes.A total of 106 and 108 patients were included in the preprotocol and postprotocol groups, respectively. After CP implementation, the median door-to-ultrasonography time decreased from 66.5 (range: 13, 761) to 54 (20, 191) minutes; meanwhile, door-to-reduction time decreased from 121.5 (37, 1077) to 80.5 (40, 285) minutes; the median ED length of stay decreased from 440 to 303.5  minutes; and finally, admission rate increased from 18.9% to 40.7% (P < .01). There was no between-group difference in the rates of complications, readmission, emergency surgery, or reduction failure.The implementation of an intussusception CP decreased time-to-diagnosis, time-to-treatment, and ED length of stay estimates among children screened using point-of-care ultrasonography. The present findings suggest that the implementation of an intussusception CP may improve the efficiency of time and resource use.

Peter SD, Beres AL, Hu YY, Renaud EJ, Ricca R, Slidell MB, Taylor A, Smith CA, Miniati D, Sola JE, Valusek P, Berman L, Raval MV, Gosain A, Dellinger MB, Sømme S, Downard CD, McAteer JP, Kawaguchi A. Management of intussusception in children: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this systematic review by the American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee was to develop recommendations for the management of ileocolic intussusception in children.

METHODS

The ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases were queried for literature from January 1988 through December 2018. Search terms were designed to address the following topics in intussusception: prophylactic antibiotic use, repeated enema reductions, outpatient management, and use of minimally invasive techniques for children with intussusception. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Consensus recommendations were derived based on the best available evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 83 articles were analyzed and included for review. Prophylactic antibiotic use does not decrease complications after radiologic reduction. Repeated enema reductions may be attempted when clinically appropriate. Patients can be safely observed in the emergency department following enema reduction of ileocolic intussusception, avoiding hospital admission. Laparoscopic reduction is often successful.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding intussusception in hemodynamically stable children without critical illness, pre-reduction antibiotics are unnecessary, non-operative outpatient management should be maximized, and minimally invasive techniques may be used to avoid laparotomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3-5 (mainly level 3-4) TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic Review of level 1-4 studies.

Impact of a Standardized Clinical Pathway for Suspected and Confirmed Ileocolic Intussusception

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Introduction:

Clinical pathways for specific diagnoses may improve patient outcomes, decrease resource utilization, and diminish costs. This study examines the impact of a clinical pathway for emergency department (ED) care of suspected and confirmed pediatric ileocolic intussusception.

Methods:

Our multidisciplinary team designed an intussusception clinical pathway and implemented it in a tertiary children’s hospital ED in October 2016. Process measures included the proportion of patients who underwent abdominal radiography, had laboratory studies, received antibiotics, or required admission following reduction of intussusception. The primary outcome measure was the cost per encounter. Balancing measures included unplanned ED visits within 72 hours of discharge. Data analyzed compared 24 months before and 21 months following pathway implementation.

Results:

After pathway implementation, the use of abdominal radiography in patients with suspected intussusception decreased from 50% to 12%. In patients with confirmed intussusception, laboratory studies decreased from 58% to 25%, antibiotic use decreased from 100% to 2%, and hospital admissions decreased from 100% to 12%. The average cost per encounter for confirmed intussusception decreased from $6,724 to $2,975. There was a small increase in unplanned returns to the ED within 72 hours but no increase in readmissions after pathway implementation.

Conclusion:

Implementation of a standardized ED pathway for the management of suspected and confirmed pediatric ileocolic intussusception is associated with a reduction in abdominal radiographs, improved antibiotic stewardship, reduction in laboratory studies, fewer inpatient admissions, and decreased cost, with no compromise in patient safety.

Air contrast enema reduction of single and recurrent ileocolic intussusceptions in children: patterns, management and outcomes

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus as to when surgical intervention should be considered for recurrent ileocolic intussusceptions in a stable patient after previous successful air contrast enema.

OBJECTIVE

To review the patterns of ileocolic intussusceptions, air contrast enema success rates, and pathologic lead point rates in patients with and without recurrence to evaluate whether treatment outcomes depend on the number and timing between episodes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 683 children with air contrast enema performed for ileocolic intussusception between January 2000 and May 2018. Recurrent intussusceptions were separated into mutually exclusive categories: short-term only (≤7 days between episodes) and long-term (>7 days between episodes) intussusceptions. Long-term recurrences included both long-term only and long- and short-term intussusceptions.

RESULTS

Of the 683 patients, 606 (89%) had at least 1 successful air contrast enema. Of the 606, 115 (19%) had recurrent intussusceptions after successful reduction. The air contrast enema success rate for a single intussusception was 86% (491/568) and for recurrent intussusceptions was 96% (110/115) (P=0.004). Single and recurrent intussusceptions had similar pathologic lead point rates (3.5% vs. 4.3%; P=0.593). Short-term and long-term recurrences did not differ in air contrast enema success rates (96% vs. 95%). Long-term recurrences had higher pathologic lead point rate compared to short-term only (13% vs. 0%; P=0.003). Of short-term recurrences, 99% (76/77) were ≤5 intussusceptions; 92% had successful air contrast enema without surgery.

CONCLUSION

The majority of recurrent intussusceptions were successfully treated by air contrast enema. Short-term recurrences have lower pathologic lead point rates, suggesting that a higher surgical threshold may be plausible relative to long-term recurrences. In the appropriate clinical context, repeat air contrast enemas are a safe option for short-term recurrences, which can be attempted at least five times, potentially precluding the need for surgical intervention.

Intussusception Protocol Implementation: Single-Site Outcomes With Clinician and Family Satisfaction

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes, costs, and clinician and parent satisfaction after implementation of a protocol to discharge patients from the emergency department (ED) after successful reduction of uncomplicated ileocolic intussusception.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In March 2017, an intussusception management protocol was implemented for children presenting with ultrasound findings of ileocolic intussusception. Those meeting inclusion criteria were observed after successful radiological reduction in the ED and discharged after 6 h with resolution of symptoms. Retrospective chart review was completed for cases before and after protocol implementation for clinical outcomes and costs. Clinicians and parents were surveyed to assess overall satisfaction.

RESULTS

Charts were reviewed before (42 encounters, 37 patients) and after (30 encounters, 23 patients) protocol implementation. After implementation, admission rates decreased from 95% (40/42) to 23% (7/30; P < 0.001) and antibiotic use was eliminated (91% to 0%, P < 0.001). There was no difference in recurrence rates (17% versus 23%, P = 0.44). Median total length of stay decreased from 18.87 to 9.52 h (P < 0.001), whereas median ED length of stay increased from 4.37 to 9.87 h (P < 0.001). In addition, there was an overall hospital cost saving of over $2000 ($9595 ± 3424 to $7465 ± 3723; P = 0.009) per encounter. Clinicians and parents were overall satisfied with the protocol and parents showed no changes in patient satisfaction with protocol implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

An intussusception protocol can facilitate early discharge from the ED and improve patient care without increased risk of recurrence. Additional benefits include decreased hospital- and patient-related costs, elimination of antibiotic use, and parent as well as clinician satisfaction.

Outpatient management of intussusception: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Variability in management of intussusception after enema reduction exists. Historically, inpatient observation was recommended; however, there is a lack of evidence-based guidelines for this practice.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating outcomes between inpatient (IP) and outpatient (OP) management after enema reduction was performed. The following databases were searched: PubMed, EBSCOhost CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database. Data from an institutional review were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Ten studies of patients aged 0-18 years with intussusception who underwent successful enema reduction that reported outcomes of outpatient management were included. Overall recurrence rates were 6% for IP and 8% for OP (p = 0.20). Recurrences within 24 (IP: 1% vs OP: 0%, p = 0.90) and 48 h (IP: 1% vs OP: 2%, p = 0.11) were similar. There was no significant difference in the rate of return to the emergency department (IP: 6% vs OP: 14%, p = 0.11). Both groups had a similar rate of requiring an operation (IP: 2% vs OP: 1%, p = 0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient management of intussusception after enema reduction results in a shorter hospital stay with no difference in the rate of return to the emergency department, recurrence, need for operation, or mortality. The findings of the meta-analysis suggest that outpatient management may be safe and could reduce hospital resource utilization.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

A method to identify pediatric high-risk diagnoses missed in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic error can lead to increased morbidity, mortality, healthcare utilization and cost. The 2015 National Academy of Medicine report "Improving Diagnosis in Healthcare" called for improving diagnostic accuracy by developing innovative electronic approaches to reduce medical errors, including missed or delayed diagnosis. The objective of this article was to develop a process to detect potential diagnostic discrepancy between pediatric emergency and inpatient discharge diagnosis using a computer-based tool facilitating expert review.

METHODS

Using a literature search and expert opinion, we identified 10 pediatric diagnoses with potential for serious consequences if missed or delayed. We then developed and applied a computerized tool to identify linked emergency department (ED) encounters and hospitalizations with these discharge diagnoses. The tool identified discordance between ED and hospital discharge diagnoses. Cases identified as discordant were manually reviewed by pediatric emergency medicine experts to confirm discordance.

RESULTS

Our computerized tool identified 55,233 ED encounters for hospitalized children over a 5-year period, of which 2161 (3.9%) had one of the 10 selected high-risk diagnoses. After expert record review, we identified 67 (3.1%) cases with discordance between ED and hospital discharge diagnoses. The most common discordant diagnoses were Kawasaki disease and pancreatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully developed and applied a semi-automated process to screen a large volume of hospital encounters to identify discordant diagnoses for selected pediatric medical conditions. This process may be valuable for informing and improving ED diagnostic accuracy.