Physiological Stress Markers Following Resuscitations Remain Elevated Throughout Physician Shift Hours

When routine becomes stressful: A qualitative study into resuscitation team members' perception of stress and performance

Interprofessional teamwork is of high importance during stressful situations such as CPR. Stress can potentially influence team performance. This study explores the perception of stress and its stressors during performance under pressure, to be able to further adjust or develop training. Healthcare professionals, who are part of the resuscitation team in a large Dutch university medical center, discussed their experiences in homogeneous focus groups. Nine focus groups and one individual interview were conducted and analyzed thematically, in order to deepen our understanding of their experiences. Thematic analysis resulted in two scenarios, routine and stress and an analysis of accompanying team processes. Routine refers to a setting perceived as straightforward. Stress develops in the presence of a combination of stressors such as a lack of clarity in roles and a lack of knowledge on fellow team members. Participants reported that stress affects the team, specifically through an altering of communication, a decrease in situational awareness, and formation of subgroups. This may lead to a further increase in stress, and potentially result in a vicious cycle. Team processes in a stressful situation like CPR can be disrupted by different stressors, and might affect the team and their performance. Improved knowledge about the stressors and their effects might be used to design a training environment representative for the performance setting healthcare professionals work in. Further research on the impact of representative training with team-level stressors and the development of a "team brain" might be worthwhile.

Development and Considerations for Virtual Reality Simulations for Resuscitation Training and Stress Inoculation

INTRODUCTION

Resuscitation simulations immerse learners into the complexity of emergency patient management. Head-Mounted Display Virtual Reality (VR) has been used for stress inoculation therapy for phobias and posttraumatic stress disorder. However, VR for stress inoculation in resuscitation leadership training has not been studied. We sought to develop VR simulation for stress inoculation, as exposure therapy training, for resuscitations.

METHODS

We explain the conceptual design, development, production, and initial evaluation process for 2 VR simulations in infant status epilepticus and pediatric anaphylactic shock. We further describe deliberate game mechanic choices to maximize psychological fidelity. In-virtual reality performance data for time-to-critical actions and stress physiology markers (heart rate, salivary cortisol) were collected from expert pediatric emergency physicians and novice pediatric residents. Data were analyzed to examine differences between the 2 groups for both outcome types to determine the extent of stress response or performance deficit the VR induced.

RESULTS

Multiple difficulties and distractions were designed for the 2 scenarios; we evaluated the highest difficulty and environmental distraction versions. Between 19 expert physicians and 15 novice physicians, no performance differences were found in typical airway, breathing, and circulation actions. Residents preferred more lorazepam first-line antiepileptics than attendings (P = 0.003) and performed a cricothyrotomy later than attendings (P = 0.02). Residents, however, manifested higher salivary cortisol levels than attendings (+0.07 μg/dL, 95% confidence interval = 0.03-0.12, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A VR resuscitation simulation manifested expected stress physiology changes in physicians. Further evaluation is needed to determine the effect of VR simulation as longitudinal stress inoculation for healthcare providers.

Pediatric emergency department shift experiences and moods: An exploratory sequential mixed-methods study

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to investigate the impact of affective, social, behavioral, and cognitive factors on pediatric emergency department (PED) provider mood changes during clinical shifts, with the introduction of a novel on-shift measure.

METHODS

The nominal group technique was used to generate the ED experience survey (EDES), encompassing factors that may influence PED provider mood. Providers were alerted via experience sampling method to complete the EDES and positive and negative affect schedule at randomly generated times. Analyses were conducted using multilevel modeling of moods within shifts within persons.

RESULTS

Measures were completed 221 times during 137 shifts by 52 PED providers. Positive mood tended to increase with higher self-rated capacity to deal with challenging patient situations (p < 0.001). Having to repeat patient assessments was negatively associated with positive mood during the beginning, but not rest of shift (p = 0.01). Changes in positive mood varied across provider groups (p < 0.001). Negative mood tended to decrease with higher self-rated quality of interactions with patients/families (p < 0.001). Needing a restroom break during any time on duty was associated with negative mood (p < 0.001). Furthermore, negative mood was associated with the need to process emotions during the shift beginning (p = 0.01). Finally, not knowing about patients' outcomes was associated with negative mood during the shift end (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

PED providers' mood during shifts are impacted by ED-specific factors spanning physical, social, behavioral, affective, and cognitive features. Future research may explore potential entry points for mitigation of clinician stress to support provider well-being and ultimately improve patient care.

Emergency Medicine Residents Experience Acute Stress While Working in the Emergency Department

INTRODUCTION

Acute stress may impair cognitive performance and multitasking, both vital in the practice of emergency medicine (EM). Previous research has demonstrated that board-certified emergency physicians experience physiologic stress while working clinically. We sought to determine whether EM residents have a similar stress response, and hypothesized that residents experience acute stress while working clinically.

METHODS

We performed a prospective observational study of physiologic stress including heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), and subjective stress in EM residents during clinical shifts in the emergency department. HR and HRV were measured via 3-lead Holter monitors and compared to baseline data obtained during weekly educational didactics. Subjective stress was assessed before and after clinical shifts via a Likert-scale questionnaire and written comments.

RESULTS

We enrolled 21 residents and acquired data from 40 shifts. Residents experienced an increase in mean HR of eight beats per minute (P < 0.001) and decrease in HRV of 53.9 milliseconds (P = 0.005) while working clinically. Subjective stress increased during clinical work (P <0.001). HRV was negatively correlated with subjective stress, but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

EM residents experience acute subjective and physiologic stress while working clinically. HR, HRV, and self-reported stress are feasible indicators to assess the acute stress response during residency training. These findings should be studied in a larger, more diverse cohort of residents and efforts made to identify characteristics that contribute to acute stress and to elicit targeted educational interventions to mitigate the acute stress response.