Out-of-hospital Respiratory Measures to Identify Patients With Serious Injury: A Systematic Review

Incidence, severity and changes of abnormal vital signs in trauma patients: A national population-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Physiological criteria are used to assess the potential severity of injury in the early phase of a trauma patient's care trajectory. Few studies have described the extent of abnormality in vital signs and different combinations of these at a national level. Aim of the study was to identify physiologic abnormalities in trauma patients and describe different combinations of abnormalities and changes between the pre-hospital and emergency department (ED) settings.

METHOD

Norwegian Trauma Registry (NTR) data between 01.01.15 - 31.12.18, where evaluated on the prevalence and characteristics of abnormal physiologic variables. Primary outcome were rates of hypoventilation (respiratory rate [RR] < 10 breaths per min), hyperventilation (RR > 29 breaths per min), hypotension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] < 90 mmHg), and reduced level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] < 13).

RESULTS

A total of 24,482 patients were included. Documented values for RR, SBP and GCS were 77.6%, 78.5% and 81.9% in the pre-hospital phase, and the corresponding percentages in the ED were 95.5%, 99.2% and 98.6%, respectively. In the pre-hospital phase, 3,615 (14.8%) patients had at least one abnormal vital sign, whereas the corresponding numbers in the ED, were 3,616 (14.8%) patients. The most frequent combination was low GCS and hyperventilation. A worsened RTS-score from pre-hospital phase to the ED was observed for RR, SBP and GCS in 3.9%, 1.2% and 1.9% of incidents, respectively. Overall 30-day mortality was 3.1% (n=752). Of these, 60.8% had abnormal vital signs, with decreased GCS as the most prevalent (61.3%).

CONCLUSION

Most trauma patients had normal vital signs. According to the RTS-score, there were few deteriorations in RR, SBP and GCS between pre-hospital phase and the ED. The most frequent abnormality was low GCS, with a higher proportion in those who died within 30 days.

Identifying Trauma Patients in Need for Emergency Surgery in the Prehospital Setting: The Prehospital Prediction of In-Hospital Emergency Treatment (PROPHET) Study

Prehospital field triage often fails to accurately identify the need for emergent surgical or non-surgical procedures, resulting in inefficient resource utilization and increased costs. This study aimed to analyze prehospital factors associated with the need for emergent procedures (such as surgery or interventional angiography) within 6 h of hospital admission. Additionally, our goal was to develop a prehospital triage tool capable of estimating the likelihood of requiring an emergent procedure following hospital admission. We conducted a retrospective observational study, analyzing both prehospital and in-hospital data obtained from the Lombardy Trauma Registry. We conducted a multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors of emergency procedures within the first 6 h from admission. Subsequently, we developed and internally validated a triage score composed of factors associated with the probability of requiring an emergency procedure. The study included a total of 3985 patients, among whom 295 (7.4%) required an emergent procedure within 6 h. Age, penetrating injury, downfall, cardiac arrest, poor neurological status, endotracheal intubation, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, shock index, respiratory rate and tachycardia were identified as predictors of requiring an emergency procedure. A triage score generated from these predictors showed a good predictive power (AUC of the ROC curve: 0.81) to identify patients requiring an emergent surgical or non-surgical procedure within 6 h from hospital admission. The proposed triage score might contribute to predicting the need for immediate resource availability in trauma patients.

Mechanism of injury and special considerations as predictive of serious injury: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's field triage guidelines (FTG) are routinely used by emergency medical services personnel for triaging injured patients. The most recent (2011) FTG contains physiologic, anatomic, mechanism, and special consideration steps. Our objective was to systematically review the criteria in the mechanism and special consideration steps that might be predictive of serious injury or need for a trauma center.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the predictive utility of mechanism and special consideration criteria for predicting serious injury. A research librarian searched in Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases for studies published between January 2011 and February 2021. Eligible studies were identified using a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were excluded if they lacked an outcome for serious injury, such as measures of resource use, injury severity scores, mortality, or composite measures using a combination of outcomes. Given the heterogeneity in populations, measures, and outcomes, results were synthesized qualitatively focusing on positive likelihood ratios (LR+) whenever these could be calculated from presented data or adjusted odds ratios (aOR).

RESULTS

We reviewed 2418 abstracts and 315 full-text publications and identified 42 relevant studies. The factors most predictive of serious injury across multiple studies were death in the same vehicle (LR+ 2.2-7.4), ejection (aOR 3.2-266.2), extrication (LR+ 1.1-6.6), lack of seat belt use (aOR 4.4-11.3), high speeds (aOR 2.0-2.9), concerning crash variables identified by vehicle telemetry systems (LR+ 4.7-22.2), falls from height (LR+ 2.4-5.9), and axial load or diving (aOR 2.5-17.6). Minor or inconsistent predictors of serious injury were vehicle intrusion (LR+ 0.8-7.2), cardiopulmonary or neurologic comorbidities (LR+ 0.8-3.1), older age (LR+ 0.6-6.8), or anticoagulant use (LR+ 1.1-1.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Select mechanism and special consideration criteria contribute positively to appropriate field triage of potentially injured patients.

National guideline for the field triage of injured patients: Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2021

This work details the process of developing the updated field triage guideline, the supporting evidence, and the final version of the 2021 National Guideline for the Field Triage of Injured Patients.

Out-of-hospital Circulatory Measures to Identify Patients With Serious Injury: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to systematically identify and summarize out-of-hospital measures of circulatory compromise as diagnostic predictors of serious injury, focusing on measures usable by emergency medical services to inform field triage decisions.

METHODS

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane databases from 1996 through August 2017 for published literature on individual circulatory measures in trauma. We reviewed reference lists of included articles for additional relevant citations. Measures of diagnostic accuracy included sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Indicators of serious injury included resource need, serious anatomic injury, and mortality. We pooled estimates when data permitted.

RESULTS

We identified 114 articles, reporting results of 111 studies. Measures included systolic blood pressure (sBP), heart rate (HR), shock index (SI), lactate, base deficit, and HR variability. Pooled out-of-hospital sensitivity estimates were sBP < 90 mm Hg = 19% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12% to 29%), HR ≥ 110 beats/min = 28% (95% CI = 20% to 37%), SI > 0.9 = 37% (95% CI = 22% to 56%), and lactate > 2.0 mmol/L = 74% (95% CI = 48% to 90%). Pooled specificity estimates were sBP < 90 mm Hg = 95% (95% CI = 91% to 97%), HR ≥ 110 beats/min = 85% (95% CI = 74% to 91%), SI > 0.9 = 85% (95% CI = 72% to 92%), and lactate > 2.0 mmol/L = 62% (95% CI = 51% to 72%). Pooled AUROCs included sBP = 0.67 (95% CI = 0.58 to 0.75), HR = 0.67 (95% CI = 0.56 to 0.79), SI = 0.72 (95% CI = 0.66 to 0.77), and lactate = 0.77 (95% CI = 0.67 to 0.82). Strength of evidence was low to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Out-of-hospital circulatory measures are associated with poor to fair discrimination for identifying trauma patients with serious injuries. Many seriously injured patients have normal circulatory measures (low sensitivity), but when present, the measures are highly specific for identifying patients with serious injuries.