Clinical factors associated with significant coronary lesions following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Management of the Comatose Adult Patient With an Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death, accounting for ≈50% of all cardiovascular deaths. The prognosis of such individuals is poor, with <10% surviving to hospital discharge. Survival with a favorable neurologic outcome is highest among individuals who present with a witnessed shockable rhythm, received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, achieve return of spontaneous circulation within 15 minutes of arrest, and have evidence of ST-segment elevation on initial ECG after return of spontaneous circulation. The cardiac catheterization laboratory plays an important role in the coordinated Chain of Survival for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The catheterization laboratory can be used to provide diagnostic, therapeutic, and resuscitative support after sudden cardiac arrest from many different cardiac causes, but it has a unique importance in the treatment of cardiac arrest resulting from underlying coronary artery disease. Over the past few years, numerous trials have clarified the role of the cardiac catheterization laboratory in the management of resuscitated patients or those with ongoing cardiac arrest. This scientific statement provides an update on the contemporary approach to managing resuscitated patients or those with ongoing cardiac arrest.

Timing and Outcomes After Coronary Angiography Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Without Signs of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

There is broad consensus that resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) should receive immediate coronary angiography (CAG); however, factors that guide patient selection and optimal timing of CAG for post-arrest patients without evidence of STEMI remain incompletely described.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to describe the timing of post-arrest CAG in actual practice, patient characteristics associated with decision to perform immediate vs. delayed CAG, and patient outcomes after CAG.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at seven U.S. academic hospitals. Resuscitated adult patients with OHCA were included if they presented between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 and received CAG during hospitalization. Emergency medical services run sheets and hospital records were analyzed. Patients without evidence of STEMI were grouped and compared based on time from arrival to CAG performance into "early" (≤ 6 h) and "delayed" (> 6 h).

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-one patients were included. Median time to CAG was 18.6 h (interquartile range [IQR] 1.5-94.6 h). Early catheterization was performed on 94 patients (42.5%) and delayed catheterization was performed on 127 patients (57.5%). Patients in the early group were older (61 years [IQR 55-70 years] vs. 57 years [IQR 47-65] years) and more likely to be male (79.8% vs. 59.8%). Those in the early group were more likely to have clinically significant lesions (58.5% vs. 39.4%) and receive revascularization (41.5% vs. 19.7%). Patients were more likely to die in the early group (47.9% vs. 33.1%). Among survivors, there was no significant difference in neurologic recovery at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

OHCA patients without evidence of STEMI who received early CAG were older and more likely to be male. This group was more likely to have intervenable lesions and receive revascularization.

Development of a clinical decision rule for the early prediction of Shock-Refractory Out-of-Hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Nearly half of ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT) out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients receive three or more shocks, often referred to as refractory VF/VT. Our objective was to derive a clinical decision rule (CDR) for the early stratification of patients into risk categories for refractory VF/VT.

METHODS

We included adults with non-traumatic OHCA in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry (2011-2015) with ≥ 1 EMS shock. We used Classification and Regression Tree analysis for CDR building using variables known at initial EMS rhythm analysis including age, sex, witness, location, bystander interventions, initial EMS rhythm, obvious non-cardiac etiology, and dispatch to arrival times. The outcome was refractory VF/VT (≥3 shocks). We calculated sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC), and odds ratios (OR). The rule was validated using the Portland Cardiac Arrest Epidemiologic Registry (2018-2020).

RESULTS

There were 17,140 eligible patients and 8,146 (47.5%) had refractory VF/VT. The optimal CDR (AUROC = 0.671) defined three groups: high-risk were any patients requiring an EMS shock after a bystander AED shock; moderate-risk were any non-EMS witnessed arrests with shockable initial EMS rhythms; and the remainder were low-risk. Refractory VF/VT increased across the low (30.7%), moderate (58.5%) and high-risk (84.8%) groups. Compared to low-risk, being moderate-risk or higher (OR [95% CI]:3.37 [3.16-3.59]; sensitivity 72.7%; specificity 55.9%) or high-risk (OR:12.63 [9.89-16.13]; sensitivity 5.4%; specificity 99.1%) had higher odds of refractory VF/VT. Results was similar in the validation cohort (n = 765, AUROC = 0.672).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at higher risk for refractory VF/VT can be identified early in EMS care.

Individual socioeconomic status and risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide case-control analysis

OBJECTIVES

Area-level socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with the incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA); however, the effects of individual-level SES on OHCA occurrence are unknown. This study investigated whether individual-level SES is associated with the occurrence of OHCA.

METHODS

This case-control study used data from the nationwide OHCA registry and the National Health Information Database (NHID) in Korea. All adult patients with OHCA of a medical etiology from 2013 to 2018 were included. Four controls were matched to each OHCA patient based on age and sex. The exposure was individual-level SES measured by insurance type and premium, which is based on income in Korea. National Health Insurance (NHI) beneficiaries were divided into four groups (Q1-Q4), and medical aid beneficiaries were separately classified as the lowest SES group. The adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the outcomes were calculated. Stratified analyses were conducted according to age and sex.

RESULTS

A total of 105,443 cases were matched with 421,772 controls. OHCA occurred more frequently in the lower SES groups. Compared with the highest SES group (Q1), the aORs for OHCA occurrence increased as the SES decreased (aORs [95% CI] were 1.21 [1.19-1.24] for Q2, 1.33 [1.31-1.36] for Q3, 1.32 [1.30-1.35] for Q4, and 2.08 [2.02-2.13] for medical aid). Disparity by individual-level SES appeared to be greater in males than in females and greater in the young and middle-aged adults than in older adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Low individual-level SES was associated with a higher probability of OHCA occurrence. Efforts are needed to reduce SES disparities in the occurrence of OHCA.