Is the association between maternal stress during pregnancy and the child's depression partly causal, and what should we do about it?

Identifying a biological signature of prenatal maternal stress

Psychological stress affects maternal gastrointestinal (GI) permeability, leading to low-grade inflammation, which can negatively affect fetal development. We investigated a panel of circulating markers as a biological signature of this stress exposure in pregnant women with and without the stress-related GI disorder irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Markers of GI permeability and inflammation were measured in plasma from healthy and IBS cohorts of women at 15 and 20 weeks’ gestation. Biomarkers were evaluated with respect to their degree of association to levels of stress, anxiety, and depression as indicated by responses from the Perceived Stress Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. High levels of stress were associated with elevations of soluble CD14, lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP), and tumor necrosis factor–α, while anxiety was associated with elevated concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) in otherwise healthy pregnancies. Prenatal depression was associated with higher levels of soluble CD14, LBP, and CRP in the healthy cohort. High levels of prenatal anxiety and depression were also associated with lower concentrations of tryptophan and kynurenine, respectively, in the IBS cohort. These markers may represent a core maternal biological signature of active prenatal stress, which can be used to inform intervention strategies via stress reduction techniques or other lifestyle approaches. Such interventions may need to be tailored to reflect underlying GI conditions, such as IBS.

A randomized, controlled pilot study of cognitive analytic therapy for stressed pregnant women with underlying anxiety and depression in a routine health service setting

A pilot study of cognitive analytic therapy (CAT) plus treatment as usual (TAU), versus TAU in stressed pregnant women with anxiety and depression, was undertaken as an essential preliminary to any definitive, randomized controlled trial (RCT). The trial was pragmatic, multicentre, parallel, randomized, controlled, and unblinded. Participants were pregnant women screened using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Treatment was standard 16-session CAT. Main outcome measures were Spielberger State/Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (primary outcome measure) at 24 weeks after randomization, therefore 1 month after therapy for the CAT group; HADS; Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM); Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS); 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36); and a brief Experiences of Therapy Questionnaire, completed at baseline and on average at 12, 24, 40, and 82 weeks after randomization. Thirty-nine patients (CAT + TAU, n = 20; TAU, n = 19) were randomized with mean baseline STAI State scores of 50.8 (SD 11.4) and 51.1 (SD 13.3), respectively. Sixteen patients had missing primary outcome data leaving 23 (n = 11 and n = 12) patients for analysis. The mean STAI State score was 38.5 (SD 13.8) and 45.7 (SD 16.8) in the CAT and TAU groups respectively at 24 weeks after randomization, with an adjusted difference in means of 7.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -7.9 to 20.6). No safety issues were reported. Patient retention for the CAT group was high (18/20; 90% of patients completed therapy). Ten out of 11 (90.9%) respondents 'agreed' or 'strongly agreed' that having CAT had been 'very helpful'. The study demonstrated the feasibility of safely undertaking CAT in this setting. Outcomes showed positive trends compatible with a clinically important effect, although statistically definitive conclusions cannot be drawn in such a study.