Addiction-related interactions of pregabalin with morphine in mice and humans: reinforcing and inhibiting effects

Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Inhibitors Block Morphine-Induced Locomotor Activation, Straub Tail, and Depression of Rearing in Mice Via a Possible Central Action

We investigated morphine-induced Straub's tail reaction (STR) in mice pretreated with or without glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) inhibitors (SB216763 and AR-A014418) by using a newly modified, infrared beam sensor-based automated apparatus. Mice treated with a single injection of morphine (30 mg/kg, i.p.) showed a significant STR with a plateau level at a time point of 20 min after morphine challenge. Pretreatment of mice with SB216763 (5 mg/kg, s.c.) or AR-A014418 (3 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly inhibited morphine-induced STR and attenuated the duration of STR in a dose-dependent fashion. In the striatum and the nucleus accumbens, expression of pGSK-3β^Tyr216 but not GSK3β or pGSK-3β^Ser9 was largely but not significantly reduced after treatment with SB216763 (5 mg/kg, s.c.) in combination with/without morphine, indicating that the inhibitory effect of GSK-3 inhibitors on morphine-induced STR and hyperlocomotion might not depend on the direct blockade of GSK-3β function. In constipated mice after morphine challenge (30 mg/kg), the effect of GSK-3 inhibitors on gastrointestinal transit was examined to reveal whether the action of GSK-3 inhibitors on morphine effects was central and/or peripheral. Pretreatment with SB216763 (5 mg/kg) did not block constipation in morphine-injected mice. The mechanism of action seems to be central but not peripheral, although the underlying subcellular mechanism of GSK-3 inhibitors is not clear. Our measurement system is a useful tool for investigating the excitatory effects of morphine in experimental animals.

The Role of Gabapentinoids in the Substance Use Pattern of Adult Germans Seeking Inpatient Detoxification Treatment - A Pilot Study

To shed more light on the addictive power of the gabapentinoids (GPTs) gabapentin and pregabalin, we performed a structured face-to-face interview with GPT-users about DSM-IV-dependence-criteria (sedatives), consume-motives and cessation-needs. Among 100 patients consecutively admitted to a detoxification-ward, fifteen (15%) reported lifetime GPT-use (18-50 years old, 2 females): seven (7%) used gabapentin, twelve (12%) pregabalin and four had lifetime experiences with both GPTs. Of the seven gabapentin-users, three patients were dependent including one person with a spontaneous remission. Of the 12 pregabalin-users, five were dependent, including two persons with a spontaneous remission. Fourteen of fifteen cases reported GPT-use side-by-side with an opioid-use, mostly for sparing opioids. Twelve GPT-users additionally co-used benzodiazepines. In no case, a GPT was the reason for detoxification treatment or reported to be involved in an emergency event. Altogether, every 7^th patient (n = 15) of our inpatient detoxification-seeking sample reported GPT-use including 50% (n = 8) who were dependent. Among them, 35% (3/8) had been already spontaneously remitted. As GPT-users reported no cession-need and the vast majority were primarily affected by co-occurring opioid- and benzodiazepine-addiction, we assume that GPTs more likely played a bystander-role than mediating the addictive behavior of this population with multiple recreational drug use experience.

How prevalent and severe is addiction on GABAmimetic drugs in an elderly German general hospital population? Focus on gabapentinoids, benzodiazepines, and z-hypnotic drugs

OBJECTIVE

Gabapentinoids (GPT) are reported to be increasingly misused by opioid- and polydrug-users, but the addictive potential of GPT outside of these populations remains understudied. Investigations comparing GPT abuse and dependence liability to that of other commonly prescribed Central Nervous System-acting medications are therefore warranted. We provide a comparison of GPT-abuse/dependence to that of other GABAmimetics within an elderly population.

DESIGN

DSM-IV-TR-based data (previously prospectively collected by SKID-I-interview) from a random sample of elderly patients admitted to a metropolitan German general hospital were reviewed. The prevalence and severity of GPT, benzodiazepine (BDZ), and z-hypnotic drug (ZD)-abuse and -dependence were compared, stratified also by mono-substance (no concurrent current or previous substance use) and de novo-substance (first)-abuse and -dependence states.

RESULTS

Among 400 patients (75 ± 6.4 years old; 63% females), neither current nor past abuse of BDZ, ZD or GPT, nor other illicit substances was observed. Dependence upon BDZ, ZD or GPT was observed among 55 (13.75%) individuals. The related lifetime/12-month prevalence-rates were: dependence condition (BDZ: 7%/2.45%; ZD: 4.25%/4.25%; GPT: 2.75/2.5%); mono-dependence condition (BDZ: 2.25%/0.75%; ZD: 1%/1%, GPT: 0%/0%); de novo-dependence condition (BDZ: 2.75%/1.75%; ZD: 1%/1%, GPT: 0.5%/0.5%). Opioid analgesic-dependence (N = 43/400) was significantly more frequently linked with BDZ than with GPT (p < 0.01) [Correction added on 29 December 2021, after first online publication: In the sentence 'Opioid analgesic-dependence…', the term 'and ZD' has been deleted]. For all three GABAmimetic classes, most mono- and de novo-dependence states were mild-to-moderate and lasted 2-6 years (median).

CONCLUSION

GABAmimetic-dependence was usually mixed with other substance-dependences. Every third to fourth instance of BDZ- or ZD-dependence was a mono-dependence condition, while a pure GPT-dependence was absent in this elderly (and illicit substance-naïve) population.

Concurrent Use of Prescription Opioids and Gabapentinoids in Older Adults

INTRODUCTION

Concurrent use of prescription opioids with gabapentinoids may pose risks of serious drug interactions. Yet, little is known about the trends in and patient characteristics associated with concurrent opioid-gabapentinoid use among older Medicare opioid users with chronic noncancer pain.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted among Medicare older beneficiaries (aged ≥65 years) with chronic noncancer pain who filled ≥1 opioid prescription within 3 months after a randomly selected chronic noncancer pain diagnosis (index date) in a calendar year between 2011 and 2018. Patient characteristics were measured in the 6-month baseline before the index date, and concurrent opioid-gabapentinoid use for ≥1 day was measured in the 3-month follow-up after the index date. Multivariable modified Poisson regression hwas used to assess the trends and characteristics of concurrent opioid-gabapentinoid use. Analyses were conducted from January to June 2021.

RESULTS

Among 464,721 eligible older beneficiaries with chronic noncancer pain and prescription opioids, the prevalence of concurrent opioid-gabapentinoid use increased from 17.0% in 2011 to 23.5% in 2018 (adjusted prevalence ratio=1.48, 95% CI=1.45, 1.53). Concurrent users versus opioid-only users tended to be non-Black, low-income subsidy recipients, and Southern residents. The clinical factors associated with concurrent opioid-gabapentinoid use included having a diagnosis of neuropathic pain, polypharmacy, and risk factors for opioid-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent opioid-gabapentinoid use among older Medicare beneficiaries with chronic noncancer pain and prescription opioids has increased significantly between 2011 and 2018. Future studies are warranted to investigate the impact of concurrent use on outcomes in older patients. Interventions that reduce inappropriate concurrent use may target older patients with identified characteristics.

Concurrent use of prescription gabapentinoids with opioids and risk for fall-related injury among older US Medicare beneficiaries with chronic noncancer pain: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Gabapentinoids are increasingly prescribed to manage chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) in older adults. When used concurrently with opioids, gabapentinoids may potentiate central nervous system (CNS) depression and increase the risks for fall. We aimed to investigate whether concurrent use of gabapentinoids with opioids compared with use of opioids alone is associated with an increased risk of fall-related injury among older adults with CNCP.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We conducted a population-based cohort study using a 5% national sample of Medicare beneficiaries in the United States between 2011 and 2018. Study sample consisted of fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with CNCP diagnosis who initiated opioids. We identified concurrent users with gabapentinoids and opioids days' supply overlapping for ≥1 day and designated first day of concurrency as the index date. We created 2 cohorts based on whether concurrent users initiated gabapentinoids on the day of opioid initiation (Cohort 1) or after opioid initiation (Cohort 2). Each concurrent user was matched to up to 4 opioid-only users on opioid initiation date and index date using risk set sampling. We followed patients from index date to first fall-related injury event ascertained using a validated claims-based algorithm, treatment discontinuation or switching, death, Medicare disenrollment, hospitalization or nursing home admission, or end of study, whichever occurred first. In each cohort, we used propensity score (PS) weighted Cox models to estimate the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of fall-related injury, adjusting for year of the index date, sociodemographics, types of chronic pain, comorbidities, frailty, polypharmacy, healthcare utilization, use of nonopioid medications, and opioid use on and before the index date. We identified 6,733 concurrent users and 27,092 matched opioid-only users in Cohort 1 and 5,709 concurrent users and 22,388 matched opioid-only users in Cohort 2. The incidence rate of fall-related injury was 24.5 per 100 person-years during follow-up (median, 9 days; interquartile range [IQR], 5 to 18 days) in Cohort 1 and was 18.0 per 100 person-years during follow-up (median, 9 days; IQR, 4 to 22 days) in Cohort 2. Concurrent users had similar risk of fall-related injury as opioid-only users in Cohort 1(aHR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.34, p = 0.874), but had higher risk for fall-related injury than opioid-only users in Cohort 2 (aHR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.44, p = 0.005). Limitations of this study included confounding due to unmeasured factors, unavailable information on gabapentinoids' indication, potential misclassification, and limited generalizability beyond older adults insured by Medicare FFS program.

CONCLUSIONS

In this sample of older Medicare beneficiaries with CNCP, initiating gabapentinoids and opioids simultaneously compared with initiating opioids only was not significantly associated with risk for fall-related injury. However, addition of gabapentinoids to an existing opioid regimen was associated with increased risks for fall. Mechanisms for the observed excess risk, whether pharmacological or because of channeling of combination therapy to high-risk patients, require further investigation. Clinicians should consider the risk-benefit of combination therapy when prescribing gabapentinoids concurrently with opioids.

A Retrospective Analysis of Gabapentinoid and Opioids to Opioid Monotherapy for Pain Relief in Patients with Chronic Neck and Low Back Pain

OBJECTIVE

We compared the reduction in pain and opioid consumption in patients with chronic spinal pain on concomitant gabapentinoids and opioids with patients using opioids only.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective chart review of patients with chronic neck or low back pain who were on opioids with at least a 24-month follow-up.

SETTING

Single-center pain clinic in an urban setting.

SUBJECTS

167 patients with chronic spinal pain lasting at least six months.

METHODS

Patients on gabapentin or pregabalin were included in the gabapentinoid group, while the other patients were included in the non-gabapentinoid group. Primary outcome was assessment of pain scores measured via a numeric rating scale (NRS), and secondary outcomes were response to the treatment (>2 point reduction on NRS) and daily opioid use measured in morphine milliequivalents.

RESULTS

Pain scores were reduced in the first six months and plateaued after that in both groups. At the end of 24 months, the average pain score was 6.71 in the gabapentinoid group, while the average pain score was 7.18 in the non-gabapentinoid group. There was no statistical significance between the groups (p = 0.28). There was no difference in response to treatment in gabapentinoid group (33.3%) when compared with non-gabapentinoid group (32.7%). We also failed to find any significant difference in daily opioid usage between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Gabapentinoids may not lead to reduction in pain or opioid consumption in patients with chronic spinal pain. A careful approach must be adopted while prescribing gabapentinoids in the chronic spinal pain patient population.

Current Evidence on Abuse and Misuse of Gabapentinoids

This review summarizes current evidence on the abuse and misuse of the gabapentinoids pregabalin and gabapentin. Pharmacovigilance studies, register-based studies, surveys, clinical toxicology studies, and forensic toxicology studies were identified and scrutinized with the goal to define the problem, identify risk factors, and discuss possible methods to reduce the potential for abuse and misuse. Studies found that gabapentinoids are abused and misused and that individuals with a history of psychiatric disorders or substance use disorder seem to be at high risk. Moreover, some evidence supports the notion that patients with opioid use disorders may be at an increased risk of abusing gabapentinoids. Available evidence also suggests that abuse and misuse are more frequent in users of pregabalin compared with users of gabapentin. Health professionals and prescribers should be aware of the risk for misuse of pregabalin and gabapentin, which eventually could lead to abuse, substance dependence, and intoxications. Prescribing to patients belonging to risk populations such as those with psychiatric disorders or substance use disorder should be avoided if possible and, if prescribed, signs of misuse and abuse should be monitored.

Dual-trajectories of opioid and gabapentinoid use and risk of subsequent drug overdose among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Little is known about opioid and gabapentinoid (OPI-GABA) use duration and dose patterns' associations with adverse outcome risks. We examined associations between OPI-GABA dose and duration trajectories and subsequent drug overdose.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

US Medicare.

PARTICIPANTS

Using a 5% sample (2011-16), we identified 71 005 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with fibromyalgia, low back pain, neuropathy and/or osteoarthritis initiating OPIs and/or GABAs [mean age ± standard deviation (SD) = 65.5 ± 14.5 years, female = 68.1%, white = 76.8%].

MEASUREMENTS

Group-based multi-trajectory models identified distinct OPI-GABA use patterns during the year of OPI and/or GABA initiation, based on weekly average standardized daily dose (i.e. OPIs = morphine milligram equivalent, GABAs = minimum effective daily dose). We estimated models with three to 12 trajectories and selected the best model based on Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and Nagin's criteria. We estimated risk of time to first drug overdose diagnosis within 12 months following the index year, adjusting for socio-demographic and health factors using inverse probability of treatment weighted multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

FINDINGS

We identified 10 distinct trajectories (BIC = -1 176 954; OPI-only = 3, GABA-only = 3, OPI-GABA = 4). Compared with OPI-only early discontinuers (40.6% of the cohort), 1-year drug overdose risk varied by trajectory group: consistent low-dose OPI-only users [16.6%; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.19-1.82], consistent high-dose OPI-only users (1.8%; HR = 4.57, 95% CI = 2.99-6.98), GABA-only early discontinuers (12.5%; HR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.09-1.77), consistent low-dose GABA-only users (11.0%; HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.12-1.85), consistent high-dose GABA-only users (3.1%; HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.94-2.17), early discontinuation of OPIs and consistent low-dose GABA users (6.9%; HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.90-1.69), consistent low-dose OPI-GABA users (3.4%; HR = 2.49, 95% CI = 1.76-3.52), consistent low-dose OPI and high-dose GABA users (3.2%; HR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.71-3.53) and consistent high-dose OPI and moderate-dose GABA users (0.9%; HR = 7.22, 95% CI = 4.46-11.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of drug overdose varied substantially among US Medicare beneficiaries on different use trajectories of opioids and gabapentinoids. High-dose opioid-only users and all consistent opioid and gabapentinoid users (regardless of doses) had more than double the risk of subsequent drug overdose compared with opioid-only early discontinuers.

The e-psychonaut drugs' psychopharmacology

The focus here was on the pharmacological and clinical pharmacological issues pertaining to the vast range of drugs (e.g. synthetic cannabimimetics, synthetic opioids, novel stimulants, novel psychedelics, PCP/ketamine-like compounds, prescribed medicinal compounds and popular psychotropic herbs/plants) discussed by Internet-based enthusiasts of new/novel psychoactive substances (NPS), 'e-psychonauts'. Currently ongoing related in silico studies, followed by further in vitro and in vivo/preclinical studies, will hopefully provide important findings in terms of which molecules within each given NPS class may present with higher levels of receptor affinities, and hence clinical potency. Understanding the pharmacological characteristics/potency of those novel recreational molecules will hopefully help in predicting related NPS diffusion, morbidity and possible lethality data.

Gabapentinoid Abuse in France: Evidence on Health Consequences and New Points of Vigilance

Introduction: Gabapentinoid drugs (gabapentin and pregabalin) are widely used worldwide for epileptic and pain disorders. First signals of gabapentinoid abuse occurred in the last decade. This study aims to describe clinical characteristics of gabapentinoid use related disorders and health consequences in France. Materials and Methods: We designed a multisource investigation reviewing data reported to the French Addictovigilance Network (FAN) with pregabalin and gabapentin from 2010 to 2019. Information was obtained through the analysis of Spontaneous Reports (SRs) notified by health professionals and the pharmacoepidemiological surveys OSIAP (suspicious prescriptions forms indicators of potential abuse), OPPIDUM (observation of illicit drugs and misuse of psychotropic medications), DRAMES (death related to prescription drugs and other substances), and DTA (toxic deaths due to analgesics). Results: Over 2010-2019 period, were collected: (i) 265 SRs (258 pregabalin; 7 gabapentin); (ii) 816 forged prescription forms (805 pregabalin, 10 gabapentin, 1 involving both drugs); (iii) 145 cases of gabapentinoid use in people who use drugs (121 pregabalin; 24 gabapentin) and (iv) 31 cases of gabapentinoid-related deaths (25 pregabalin; 6 gabapentin). Risk factors of gabapentinoid abuse were opioid use disorders or psychiatric history, but cases of primary abuse in subjects without any substance abuse history were observed. Adverse outcomes concern almost exclusively pregabalin, with coma, dyspnea, convulsion, and conduction disorders. Treatment demands increased from 10.6% in 2018 to 23.1% in 2019, with pregabalin cited as the first substance leading to addictological care in the 2019 OPPIDUM survey. Gabapentinoid-related deaths increased over time. Pregabalin has become the first drug mentioned in forged prescriptions in 2019 (23.8% of OSIAP), while it ranked at the 15th position in 2017 (2.6%). Discussion: This study shows the importance of addictovigilance monitoring for gabapentinoids. Addictovigilance data helped to make visible the gabapentinoid-abuse related health harms (hospitalization for serious neurologic, psychiatric or cardiac effects, requests for addictological support and deaths) and to confirm the intrinsic abuse potential of pregabalin. These data highlight new points of vigilance considering observed primary abuse. At this point in France, the risk of abuse and related complications is very apparent with pregabalin. Still, it is identical to that observed elsewhere with gabapentin.

Gabapentinoid Benefit and Risk Stratification: Mechanisms Over Myth

INTRODUCTION

Recent years have seen a dramatic escalation of off-label prescribing for gabapentin and pregabalin (gabapentinoids) owing in part to generic versions of each being released over the past two decades, but also in part as a response to increasing calls for multimodal and non-opioid pain management strategies. In this context, several recent articles have been published alleging widespread misuse, with speculations on the unappreciated addictive potential of the gabapentinoid class of drugs. Reports of a 1% population-level abuse prevalence stem from a single internet survey in the UK, and the vanishingly small adverse event outcomes data do not support such frequency. In this targeted narrative review, we aim to disabuse pain physicians and other clinicians, pharmacists, and policymakers of both the positive and negative myths concerning gabapentinoid medications.

RESULTS

Gabapentinoids inhibit the joint action of voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) α2δ subunits in conjunction with the n-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, with subsequent downregulation of VGCC expression and excitatory neurotransmitter release, and possibly synaptogenesis as well, through actions on thrombospondins. These activities reduce the likelihood of central sensitization, which explains in part the efficacy of the gabapentinoids in the management of neuropathic pain. Gabapentinoids also facilitate slow-wave sleep, a relatively rare phenomenon among central nerve system-acting agents, which is also thought to explain some of the therapeutic benefit of the class in conditions such as fibromyalgia. The number needed to treat to see benefit overlaps that of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, but with a considerably improved safety profile. Along these lines, in the context of over 50 million prescriptions per year in the USA alone, the gabapentinoids display remarkably low risk, including risks of misuse, abuse, and dependence. Furthermore, the neurobiology of these agents does not lend plausibility to the allegations, as they have never been shown to elicit dopaminergic activity within the nucleus accumbens, and in addition likely confer a "negative-feedback loop" for habituation and dependence by serving as functional NMDA antagonists, possibly through their actions on thrombospondins. Clinical and epidemiological addictionology studies corroborate the lack of any significant addictive potential of the gabapentinoids, and these drugs are increasingly being used in the treatment of addiction to other substances, with excellent results and no evidence of cross-addiction. However, among individuals with other substance use disorders and, in particular opioid use disorder, there are consistent data showing misuse of gabapentinoids in up to 20% of this population. Although there are allegations of using gabapentinoids to amplify the hedonic effects of opioids, the vast majority of misuse events appear to occur in an attempt to ameliorate opioid withdrawal symptoms. Furthermore, rare but potentially serious respiratory depression may occur, again amplified in the context of opioid or other sedative use. Careful risk:benefit assessment and stratification are warranted when prescription of a gabapentinoid is under consideration, in particular among individuals using opioids.

CONCLUSIONS

Gabapentinoids remain a vital tool in the pain physician's multimodal armamentarium, but these drugs may not be effective in every clinical situation. Individuals with central sensitization and pain associated with slow-wave sleep deficits and potentially persons with comorbid addictions may benefit the most. The gabapentinoids appear to possess no addictive potential on their own, based on laboratory and clinical data, but they may be abused by persons with opioid use disorders; consequently, cautious risk stratification must take place.

Endogenous Opiates and Behavior: 2018

This paper is the forty-first consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2018 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (2), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (3) and humans (4), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (5), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (6), stress and social status (7), learning and memory (8), eating and drinking (9), drug abuse and alcohol (10), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (11), mental illness and mood (12), seizures and neurologic disorders (13), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (14), general activity and locomotion (15), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (16), cardiovascular responses (17), respiration and thermoregulation (18), and immunological responses (19).

Clinical Trials for Opioid Use Disorder

This chapter describes recent clinical trials for opioid use disorder (OUD), an area that has rapidly accelerated in response to the opioid overdose crisis in the USA and newly appropriated funding. Trials involve a wide range of compounds including cannabinoids and psychedelics, new and existing compounds targeting domains emerging from addiction neuroscience, agents repurposed from other indications, and novel strategies including vaccines, enzymes, and other biologicals. In parallel, new formulations of existing compounds offer immediate promise, as do a variety of web-based interventions and smartphone-delivered apps. Trials focused on implementing existing effective interventions in mainstream healthcare settings, and others focused on special populations, e.g., adolescents, criminal justice, pregnant women, native Americans, etc., have the potential to vastly expand treatment in the near term. Given the range of ongoing and recent trials, this chapter is not intended to be an exhaustive review but rather to present an overview of approaches within the framework of the opioid treatment cascade and the context of current OUD pharmacotherapies.

Trends in prior receipt of prescription opioid or adjuvant analgesics among patients with incident opioid use disorder or opioid-related overdose from 2006 to 2016

BACKGROUND

With increasing efforts to scrutinize and reduce opioid prescribing, limited data exist on the recent trend in receipt of prescription pain medications before diagnosis of opioid use disorder (OUD) or opioid-related overdose (OD).

METHODS

Using 2005-2016 Truven MarketScan Commercial Claims databases, we assessed trends in annual 1) incidence of OUD or OD and 2) prevalence of receipt of prescription opioids or four commonly-prescribed adjuvant analgesics among patients newly diagnosed with OUD/OD. Trends were examined in the overall sample and by 3 age groups, including youths (≤18 years), adults (19-64 years), and older adults (≥65 years).

RESULTS

The incidence of diagnosed OUD or OD increased more than 3-fold from 4.99 to 23.81 per 10,000 persons from 2006 to 2016, with the highest increase (14.18-fold) seen in older adults, followed by adults (3.53-fold), and youths (0.16-fold). Between 2006 and 2016, the proportion of patients with incident OUD/OD who received anticonvulsant adjuvant analgesics in the year before diagnosis increased (from 23.4% to 34.3% [P-trend = .005]) whereas the proportion receiving high-dose prescriptions opioids decreased (from 45.5% to 34.8% [P-trend =< .001]). A decreasing trend was observed in general for tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.

DISCUSSION

In US commercially insured patients newly diagnosed with OUD/OD, receipt of high-dose opioid prescriptions preceding the diagnosis decreased over time, paralleled by increased use of anticonvulsants commonly prescribed for pain conditions. Further investigations are warranted to understand how prescribed and anticonvulsants contribute to the development of OUD/OD.

Prescriptions et usages de prégabaline : analyse d’une cohorte de 419 patients en centre d’étude et de traitement de la douleur et revue de la littérature

Du fait de l’augmentation du nombre de prescription de prégabaline dans le domaine de la douleur chronique et de cas relevés de mésusage récréatif ou toxicomaniaque avec ce médicament dans le monde, dans le contexte de la crise sanitaire en cours avec l’usage des opioïdes aux États-Unis, la crainte d’un risque addictif directement lié à l’usage de cette molécule a incité les autorités de divers pays à une surveillance accrue. Les recueils effectués par les centres de pharmacovigilance concernant la prégabaline relevant avant tout les situations considérées comme anormales, la description de l’usage de cette molécule au quotidien par un ensemble de prescripteurs et d’utilisateurs durant une période prolongée reflète mieux les conditions naturelles d’emploi de cette molécule et permet d’identifier les divers types de comportements des professionnels et usagers de santé à son égard. Une analyse rétrospective des dossiers de patients utilisateurs de prégabaline reçus et suivis dans une structure d’évaluation et prise en charge de la douleur pendant six ans a été réalisée, comprenant des données précises concernant les conditions d’usage et les effets du médicament. Les données issues de la littérature internationale et celles issues de l’étude montrent que le risque de mésusage et addictif est faible dans un contexte de prescription antalgique et de suivi médical adéquat, alors qu’il est élevé et directement lié à un mésusage de type récréatif ou toxicomaniaque en association avec les opioïdes ou l’alcool, en particulier dans la population jeune et en dehors du milieu des soins. Des recommandations d’usage de la prégabaline sont proposées aux professionnels afin de rappeler ces facteurs de risque.

Lack of correlation between the activity of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system and the rewarding properties of pregabalin in mouse

RATIONALE

Pregabalin is a psychoactive drug indicated in the treatment of epilepsy, neuropathic pain, and generalized anxiety disorders. Pregabalin acts on different neurotransmission systems by inactivating the alpha2-delta subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels. In light of this pharmacological property, the hypothesis has been raised that pregabalin may regulate the mesolimbic dopamine pathway and thereby display a potential for misuse or abuse as recently observed in humans. Although some preclinical data support this possibility, the rewarding properties of gabapentinoid are still a matter for debate.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to evaluate the rewarding properties of pregabalin and to determine its putative mechanism of action in healthy mice.

RESULTS

Pregabalin alone (60 mg/kg; s.c.) produced a rewarding effect in the conditioned place preference (CPP) test albeit to a lower extent than cocaine (30 mg/kg; s.c.). Interestingly, when assessing locomotor activity in the CPP, the PGB60 group, similarly to the cocaine group, showed an increased locomotor activity. In vivo single unit extracellular recording showed that pregabalin had mixed effects on dopamine (DA) neuronal activity in the ventral tegmental area since it decreased the activity of 50% of neurons and increased 28.5% of them. In contrast, cocaine decreased 75% of VTA DA neuronal activity whereas none of the neurons were activated. Intracerebal microdialysis was then conducted in awake freely mice to determine to what extent such electrophysiological parameters influence the extracellular DA concentrations ([DA]ext) in the nucleus accumbens. Although pregabalin failed to modify this parameter, cocaine produced a robust increase (800%) in [DA]ext.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, these electrophysiological and neurochemical experiments suggest that the rewarding properties of pregabalin result from a different mode of action than that observed with cocaine. Further experiments are warranted to determine whether such undesirable effects can be potentiated under pathological conditions such as neuropathic pain, mood disorders, or addiction and to identify the key neurotransmitter system involved.

Conditioned Aversion and Neuroplasticity Induced by a Superagonist of Extrasynaptic GABAA Receptors: Correlation With Activation of the Oval BNST Neurons and CRF Mechanisms

THIP (gaboxadol), a superagonist of the δ subunit-containing extrasynaptic GABA_A receptors, produces persistent neuroplasticity in dopamine (DA) neurons of the ventral tegmental area (VTA), similarly to rewarding drugs of abuse. However, unlike them THIP lacks abuse potential and induces conditioned place aversion in mice. The mechanism underlying the aversive effects of THIP remains elusive. Here, we show that mild aversive effects of THIP were detected 2 h after administration likely reflecting an anxiety-like state with increased corticosterone release and with central recruitment of corticotropin-releasing factor corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 (CRF₁) receptors. A detailed immunohistochemical c-Fos expression mapping for THIP-activated brain areas revealed a correlation between the activation of CRF-expressing neurons in the oval nucleus of the bed nuclei of stria terminalis and THIP-induced aversive effects. In addition, the neuroplasticity of mesolimbic DA system (24 h after administration) and conditioned place aversion by THIP after four daily acute sessions were dependent on extrasynaptic GABA_A receptors (abolished in δ-GABA_A receptor knockout mice) and activation of the CRF₁ receptors (abolished in wildtype mice by a CRF₁ receptor antagonist). A selective THIP-induced activation of CRF-expressing neurons in the oval part of the bed nucleus of stria terminalis may constitute a novel mechanism for inducing plasticity in a population of VTA DA neurons and aversive behavioral states.

Screening for physical and behavioral dependence on non-opioid analgesics in a German elderly hospital population

OBJECTIVE

To provide further evidence of dependence on non-opioid analgesics (NOAs).

METHODS

Post-hoc-analysis of a cross-sectional study of a ≥ -65-year-old non-demented German general hospital population. Four hundred in-patients (75 ± 6.4 years; 63% females) were included and screened for current and past dependence on NOAs using a structured interview (SKID-I) based on DSM-IV-TR. The addiction section of SKID-I was expanded to the following NOAs: gabapentinoids, acetaminophen, metamizole, flupirtine, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

RESULTS

We found twenty-eight seniors (7%) who fulfilled the criteria for a NOA-dependence. Of whom, twenty-four and four patients were currently dependent and in remission, respectively. According to SKID-I, twenty-one (75%) patients were mildly, five patients (17.9%) moderately, and two (7.1%) patients severely dependent on NOAs. All patients showed at least one sign of physical dependence (tolerance and/or withdrawal symptoms) and most of them reported additional behavioral dependence symptoms. Whereas there was one dependence on gabapentinoids or acetaminophen only, NSAIDs and metamizole were involved in the majority of cases (n = 25; 89.3%). Of note, ten (35.7%) seniors had a de-novo substance dependence exclusively on NOAs - including 2 females with signs of a de-novo dependence on metamizole, a NOA which yet has been not in the focus of addiction medicine.

CONCLUSION

This cross-sectional study provides further evidence of the existence of a physical and behavioral dependence on NOAs including NSAIDs. Furthermore, preliminary evidence of a de-novo dependence on metamizole is provided which needs further verification.

Conditioned Reward of Opioids, but not Psychostimulants, is Impaired in GABA-A Receptor δ Subunit Knockout Mice

Extrasynaptic δ subunit-containing γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (δ-GABA_A Rs) are emerging as targets for a number of neuropsychopharmacological drugs, including the direct GABA site agonist gaboxadol and neuroactive steroids. Among other regions, these δ-GABA_A Rs are functionally expressed in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), the cell body region of mesocorticolimbic dopamine (DA) system important for motivated behaviours, and in the target region, the nucleus accumbens. Gaboxadol and neurosteroids induce VTA DA neuron plasticity ex vivo, by inhibiting the VTA GABA neurons, and aversive place conditioning, which are absent in the δ-GABA_A R knockout mice (δ-KO). It is not known whether δ-GABA_A Rs are important for the effects of other drugs, such as opioids (that also inhibit GABA neurons) and stimulants (that primarily elevate monoamine levels). Here, we used δ-KO mice and conditioned place preference (CPP) test to study the rewarding effects of morphine (20 mg/kg), methamphetamine (1 mg/kg) and mephedrone (5 mg/kg). Morphine-induced nociception was also assessed using tail-flick and hot-plate tests. We found that the δ-KO mice failed to express morphine-induced CPP, but that they were more sensitive to morphine-induced analgesia in the tail-flick test. In contrast, stimulant-induced CPP in the δ-KO mice was similar to that in the wild-type controls. Thus, the conditioned rewarding effect by opioids, but not that of stimulants, was impaired in the absence of δ-GABA_A Rs. Further studies are warranted to assess the potential of δ-GABA_A R antagonists as possible targets for reducing morphine reward and potentiating morphine analgesia.

Pregabalin Misuse and Abuse: A Scoping Review of Extant Literature

Prescribing of pregabalin is increasing worldwide with public health concerns centering on misuse and abuse of prescribed and diverted pregabalin. To describe and map what is known about misuse and abuse of pregabalin, a scoping review of available published literature was undertaken. A scoping review methodology was used to identify and map available literature on misuse and abuse of prescribed and diverted pregabalin. Four themes emerged on the misuse and abuse of pregabalin: (a) abuse potential, (b) prevalence of abuse, (c) risk and predisposition, and (d) consequences of abuse. Fifty-four records were reviewed and charted. Of note was the dearth of research on the topic prior to 2005, with increased interest in pregabalin abuse potential from 2010 onward. Available literature supports concern around abuse potential of pregabalin, especially among patients with a history of substance abuse. Prescribers should adopt more rational prescribing.

Pregabalin Use Among Users of Illicit Drugs: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Southern Germany

BACKGROUND

The antiepileptic drug pregabalin is one of the best-selling pharmaceutical products worldwide. There are increasing concerns about its potential for misuse and dependence especially among patients with former or current substance use disorders (SUDs).

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to clarify the extent and pattern of pregabalin use as well as motives and predictors in this population.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study with patients on a detoxification ward for illicit drugs at the Center for Psychiatry, Südwürttemberg, Ravensburg in southern Germany from August 2012 until July 2013. We used an extensive questionnaire, part of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition) Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) and urine samples.

RESULTS

Of the 253 participating patients, 56% had used pregabalin at least once. Of these, 92% had acquired it at least in part from illegal sources. The main motives for the use of pregabalin were the attenuation of opioid withdrawal symptoms, the augmentation of other psychotropic substances, and the psychotropic effects of pregabalin itself. Predictors for pregabalin use were opioid and sedative use as well as younger age. The criteria of dependency according to DSM-IV was met by 11% of pregabalin users and 13% of urine samples were positive for pregabalin.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of pregabalin is common among users of illicit drugs in large parts of southern Germany, with motives for use, acquisition, and mode of use suggesting misuse. The mode of use, especially intake of high doses and concomitant use of other drugs, poses a serious risk to this population, including the development of dependency.