Tangled-up and blue: releasing the regulatory chokehold on take-home naloxone

Impact of naloxone education for patients receiving buprenorphine-containing prescriptions indicated for opioid use disorder at an independent community pharmacy

OBJECTIVES

A pilot study was conducted to identify whether an opioid education and naloxone distribution (OEND) service affected (1) willingness to accept naloxone; (2) naloxone dispensation; and (3) patient knowledge about opioids, overdose symptoms, and naloxone in patients receiving buprenorphine prescriptions for opioid use disorder (OUD).

METHODS

Participants were enrolled from January 2, 2019, to February 15, 2019, in this prospective noncontrolled study when receiving a buprenorphine prescription at the study site. The exclusion criteria included prescriptions being picked up by someone other than the patient and those who were below 18 years of age. The participants completed a written pre- and postsurvey containing "Yes" or "No," "Select all that apply," and open-ended questions assessing (1) willingness to accept naloxone and (2) change in opioid and naloxone knowledge.

RESULTS

Fifty-two participants were enrolled, and all completed the pre- and postsurveys. After the education, there was a not statistically significant change in the proportion of participants willing to accept naloxone from the pharmacy (28.8% vs. 36.5%; P = 0.31). In addition, there was an improvement in the proportion of participants believing that they need to carry naloxone with them (15.4% vs. 40.4%; P < 0.001). Naloxone dispensing increased 400% after the intervention implementation. Improvements in opioid knowledge also occurred. More participants correctly identified buprenorphine as an opioid (48.1% vs. 86.5%; P < 0.001), and correctly identified that methamphetamine (19.2% vs. 3.8%; P = 0.02) and cocaine (17.3% vs. 3.8%; P = 0.03) are not opioids. Of the 52 participants enrolled, 11.5% correctly identified all opioids on the presurvey, whereas 50% correctly identified all opioids on the postsurvey.

CONCLUSION

Patients diagnosed with OUD who are prescribed buprenorphine may be at high risk of an overdose if they return to use; yet, few OEND programs specifically target this population. This study suggests that OEND based in community pharmacies may be a strategy to increase naloxone access among these patients.

Intranasal naloxone and related strategies for opioid overdose intervention by nonmedical personnel: a review

Deaths due to prescription and illicit opioid overdose have been rising at an alarming rate, particularly in the USA. Although naloxone injection is a safe and effective treatment for opioid overdose, it is frequently unavailable in a timely manner due to legal and practical restrictions on its use by laypeople. As a result, an effort spanning decades has resulted in the development of strategies to make naloxone available for layperson or "take-home" use. This has included the development of naloxone formulations that are easier to administer for nonmedical users, such as intranasal and autoinjector intramuscular delivery systems, efforts to distribute naloxone to potentially high-impact categories of nonmedical users, as well as efforts to reduce regulatory barriers to more widespread distribution and use. Here we review the historical and current literature on the efficacy and safety of naloxone for use by nonmedical persons, provide an evidence-based discussion of the controversies regarding the safety and efficacy of different formulations of take-home naloxone, and assess the status of current efforts to increase its public distribution. Take-home naloxone is safe and effective for the treatment of opioid overdose when administered by laypeople in a community setting, shortening the time to reversal of opioid toxicity and reducing opioid-related deaths. Complementary strategies have together shown promise for increased dissemination of take-home naloxone, including 1) provision of education and training; 2) distribution to critical populations such as persons with opioid addiction, family members, and first responders; 3) reduction of prescribing barriers to access; and 4) reduction of legal recrimination fears as barriers to use. Although there has been considerable progress in decreasing the regulatory and legal barriers to effective implementation of community naloxone programs, significant barriers still exist, and much work remains to be done to integrate these programs into efforts to provide effective treatment of opioid use disorders.