Disinfection of dentinal tubules with diclofenac sodium and N-Acetylcysteine compared with calcium hydroxide as intracanal medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis

Evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of different nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs alone or in combination with calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament: an in vitro study

This study explored the antimicrobial effects of ketoprofen, piroxicam, and celecoxib alone or combined with calcium hydroxide (CH) against two strains of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) and assessed the influence of such combinations on the pH of CH. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the three tested NSAIDs were determined. Tested pastes were placed into wells punched in seeded agar plates and the bacterial inhibition zones were measured. Antibiofilm activity was assessed against 3 weeks of biofilm induced in bovine dentine blocks. The pH of the pastes was measured at four-time intervals. MIC values were 3.12, 25, and 25 mg/ml for ketoprofen, piroxicam, and celecoxib, respectively, and were similar for both bacterial strains except for celecoxib, which showed 8% growth at the highest tested concentration against vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis. Ketoprofen had the largest mean inhibition zone that was comparable to CH. None of the six tested pastes exhibited antibiofilm activity of a significant level in comparison to CH. A noticeable increase in the antibiofilm activity was found when 20% NSAIDs were added to CH while maintaining an alkaline pH. Ketoprofen was found to be the most effective among the tested NSAIDs. Although its effect was comparable to CH, adding ketoprofen at a ratio of 20% resulted in 50% higher antimicrobial action than CH alone. Accordingly, incorporating NSAIDs in inter-appointment dressing has the potential to utilize their anti-inflammatory, local analgesic, and antibacterial actions, which overcome the limitations of CH and improve the outcome of root canal treatment.

Antibacterial and anti-inflammatory efficacy of N-acetyl cysteine in endodontic treatment: a scoping review

Background

This scoping review systematically summarized the available evidence about the efficacy of N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) as an intracanal antibacterial and/or anti-inflammatory.

Methods

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google scholar search engines/databases were searched up to February 2022 to retrieve relevant studies. The studies were evaluated for eligibility criteria, and identifying relevant studies.

Results

Out of 193 studies, 15 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were processed for data extraction. Thirteen in vitro studies assessed antibacterial/antibiofilm efficacy of NAC, and reported good and promising efficacy: NAC was found as efficacious as the comparators (chlorhexidine, sodium hypochlorite, calcium hydroxide), or even showed higher efficacy. Regarding the anti-inflammatory efficacy of NAC, one in vitro study found it equivalent to, while one clinical trial revealed it more efficacious than calcium hydroxide.

Conclusions

There is accumulating evidence on the anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory efficacy of NAC in context of endodontics. However, further clinical trials with robust methodology and objective and reliable clinical, biological and microbial outcomes are warranted to translate its use for clinical practice on humans.