Evidence of distinct gene functional patterns in GC-poor and GC-rich isochores in Bos taurus

Abandoning the Isochore Theory Can Help Explain Genome Compositional Organization in Fish

The organization of the genome nucleotide (AT/GC) composition in vertebrates remains poorly understood despite the numerous genome assemblies available. Particularly, the origin of the AT/GC heterogeneity in amniotes, in comparison to the homogeneity in anamniotes, is controversial. Recently, several exceptions to this dichotomy were confirmed in an ancient fish lineage with mammalian AT/GC heterogeneity. Hence, our current knowledge necessitates a reevaluation considering this fact and utilizing newly available data and tools. We analyzed fish genomes in silico with as low user input as possible to compare previous approaches to assessing genome composition. Our results revealed a disparity between previously used plots of GC% and histograms representing the authentic distribution of GC% values in genomes. Previous plots heavily reduced the range of GC% values in fish to comply with the alleged AT/GC homogeneity and AT-richness of their genomes. We illustrate how the selected sequence size influences the clustering of GC% values. Previous approaches that disregarded chromosome and genome sizes, which are about three times smaller in fish than in mammals, distorted their results and contributed to the persisting confusion about fish genome composition. Chromosome size and their transposons may drive the AT/GC heterogeneity apparent on mammalian chromosomes, whereas far less in fishes.

Slaying (Yet Again) the Brain-Eating Zombie Called the "Isochore Theory": A Segmentation Algorithm Used to "Confirm" the Existence of Isochores Creates "Isochores" Where None Exist

The isochore theory, which was proposed more than 40 years ago, depicts the mammalian genome as a mosaic of long, homogeneous regions that are characterized by their guanine and cytosine (GC) content. The human genome, for instance, was claimed to consist of five compositionally distinct isochore families. The isochore theory, in all its reincarnations, has been repeatedly falsified in the literature, yet isochore proponents have persistently resurrected it by either redefining isochores or by proposing alternative means of testing the theory. Here, I deal with the latest attempt to salvage this seemingly immortal zombie—a sequence segmentation method called isoSegmenter, which was claimed to “identify” isochores while at the same time disregarding the main characteristic attribute of isochores—compositional homogeneity. I used a series of controlled, randomly generated simulated sequences as a benchmark to study the performance of isoSegmenter. The main advantage of using simulated sequences is that, unlike real data, the exact start and stop point of any isochore or homogeneous compositional domain is known. Based on three key performance metrics—sensitivity, precision, and Jaccard similarity index—isoSegmenter was found to be vastly inferior to isoPlotter, a segmentation algorithm with no user input. Moreover, isoSegmenter identified isochores where none exist and failed to identify compositionally homogeneous sequences that were shorter than 100−200 kb. Will this zillionth refutation of “isochores” ensure a final and permanent entombment of the isochore theory? This author is not holding his breath.

The "Genomic Code": DNA Pervasively Moulds Chromatin Structures Leaving no Room for "Junk"

The chromatin of the human genome was analyzed at three DNA size levels. At the first, compartment level, two "gene spaces" were found many years ago: A GC-rich, gene-rich "genome core" and a GC-poor, gene-poor "genome desert", the former corresponding to open chromatin centrally located in the interphase nucleus, the latter to closed chromatin located peripherally. This bimodality was later confirmed and extended by the discoveries (1) of LADs, the Lamina-Associated Domains, and InterLADs; (2) of two "spatial compartments", A and B, identified on the basis of chromatin interactions; and (3) of "forests and prairies" characterized by high and low CpG islands densities. Chromatin compartments were shown to be associated with the compositionally different, flat and single- or multi-peak DNA structures of the two, GC-poor and GC-rich, "super-families" of isochores. At the second, sub-compartment, level, chromatin corresponds to flat isochores and to isochore loops (due to compositional DNA gradients) that are susceptible to extrusion. Finally, at the short-sequence level, two sets of sequences, GC-poor and GC-rich, define two different nucleosome spacings, a short one and a long one. In conclusion, chromatin structures are moulded according to a "genomic code" by DNA sequences that pervade the genome and leave no room for "junk".

IsoXpressor: A Tool to Assess Transcriptional Activity within Isochores

Genomes are characterized by large regions of homogeneous base compositions known as isochores. The latter are divided into GC-poor and GC-rich classes linked to distinct functional and structural properties. Several studies have addressed how isochores shape function and structure. To aid in this important subject, we present IsoXpressor, a tool designed for the analysis of the functional property of transcription within isochores. IsoXpressor allows users to process RNA-Seq data in relation to the isochores, and it can be employed to investigate any biological question of interest for any species. The results presented herein as proof of concept are focused on the preimplantation process in Homo sapiens (human) and Macaca mulatta (rhesus monkey).