General practice nurse-led screening for anxiety in later life in Australian primary care settings

The feasibility and impact of a brief behavioural intervention for anxiety in later life: perceptions of general practice nurses

BACKGROUND

Anxiety is prevalent in older people and is associated with adverse health outcomes. Early detection and intervention are imperative, yet clinically significant anxiety in older people is often under-diagnosed. When diagnosed, pharmacotherapy is often the initial treatment, but resistance due to stigma, polypharmacy concerns, and side effects are common among the elderly. Non-pharmacological interventions such as deep breathing and progressive muscle relaxation may offer more acceptable and cost-effective options to managing anxiety. While primary care is ideal for addressing anxiety in older adults, it is important to assess the feasibility and acceptability of nurse-led interventions in general practice.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the perspectives of General Practice Nurses (GPNs) on the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a guided relaxation intervention for older people living with symptoms of anxiety, in Australian metropolitan and regional settings.

METHODS

GPNs were trained and then administered a guided relaxation intervention to older people at three metropolitan general practices and one large rural practice encompassing four sites. Subsequently, five GPNs participated in semi-structured interviews exploring the acceptability and feasibility of implementing the intervention. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and findings were mapped to four key domains of interest: "Screening", "Training and Delivery", "Perceived impact of the Intervention" and "Barriers to the intervention".

RESULTS

Overall, GPNs reported that the intervention was easy to implement, was well received, helped build relationships and enabled conversations about mental health and well-being. They noted broader applicability of acquired knowledge and skills with other clients.

CONCLUSION

The intervention shows promise in promoting and supporting healthcare capabilities in primary care. GPNs are ideally placed to detect clinical symptoms of anxiety among older people and deliver brief well-being initiatives. However, to sustain and scale well-being interventions structured skill development, commitment from general practices, and policy shifts such as government rebates for GPNs are required.

Facilitating Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Anxiety in Older People: History, Effectiveness, and Future Possibilities

The origins of mindfulness go back some 25 centuries to Eastern teachings, including Buddhism and Hinduism. Mindfulness-based interventions gained credence in Western mental health settings in the late 1970s through the work of medical researcher Kabat-Zinn, whose interest in Eastern meditation led him to develop a program for stress reduction. Since then, mindfulness-based interventions have been utilized for various populations, including older people with anxiety. Group mindfulness-based interventions have demonstrated benefits for older people with anxiety living in residential aged care and the community. In primary care settings, innovative delivery models for group mindfulness-based interventions could be facilitated by nurses to support older people with anxiety to age in place with dignity. The benefits of mindfulness-based interventions suggest the value of integrating ancient Eastern techniques with modern Western strategies to achieve better health outcomes for older people with mental health concerns.

Experienced general practitioners' and practice nurses' views on the older-person health assessment forms

Objective Health assessments (HAs) are available annually for community-dwelling older people: the 75+HA for non-Indigenous Australians aged ≥75 years and the 55+IHA for Indigenous Australians aged ≥55 years. Medicare requires general practitioners (GPs) to cover the items within the relevant HA form. This study explored the views of experienced GPs and practice nurses (PNs) towards the older-person HA forms. Methods Thirty-nine experienced GPs and PNs responded to an online questionnaire. Results In this study, experienced GPs and PNs suggested that current items within the 75+HA Medicare-provided guideline form need reviewing, such as those relating to psychological function, medication and exercise and falls. There were also recommendations to consider including items consistently across both the 55+IHA and 75+HA and to include new items, such as personal alarms, loneliness, support networks, spiritual health, musculoskeletal diseases, whether other screening is up to date and future planning. Many parts of the HA were deemed irrelevant or condescending to 'well' older Australians, so should be optional. Healthcare professionals also requested reintroducing conducting the HA at the community-dwelling patient's home. User-friendly integrated forms would improve healthcare professionals' time management and provide better communication with patients and carers, and create greater opportunities for multidisciplinary referral processes, as well as provide linkages to MyAgedCare and myHealthRecord. Conclusion Capturing the views of healthcare professionals towards older-person HA forms generated suggested improvements. The adoption of these suggestions would elicit more holistic health information for older Australians. What is known about the topic? Annual HAs are available for older Australians (75+HAs and 55+IHAs). Medicare requires GPs cover items within their prescribed HA form. The 75+HAs and 55+IHAs allow for the monitoring of health problems specific to community-dwelling older people, which may be difficult to address in the time frames of a standard GP consultation; however, there is very little research on the experiences of health professionals regarding the conditions required to be assessed within the HAs. What does this paper add? This study examined the views of experienced GPs and PNs to identify potential changes to the current procedures. Capturing the views of healthcare professionals towards older-person HA forms generated important suggested improvements, such as reviewing psychological function, medication, exercise and falls items. There were recommendations to include items across both the 55+IHA and 75+HA and new items, such as personal alarms, loneliness, support networks, spiritual health, musculoskeletal diseases assessments, future planning and whether the patient's screening is up to date. What are the implications for practitioners? The experienced GPs and PNs in this study suggested significant additions and revisions to the current HA forms. The incorporation of these suggestions should lead to permanent modifications of the current forms to make them more relevant and appropriate for older Australians, but the challenge for implementation is how these additional items would be funded.

What is learned from an Australian older person health assessment?

Objective To examine what new health information is identified at a patient's most recent 75+HA compared with their standard GP consultations in the prior 24 months. Methods Parameters measured included newly identified chronic conditions, new management for previously diagnosed chronic conditions, medication management, referrals, vaccinations, and positive test results for the monitoring of previously diagnosed chronic conditions. A retrospective patient record study collecting data from two GP clinics in metropolitan and regional Victoria was undertaken. A total of 195 75+HA recipients were included. Results No significant difference was found in the number of new chronic conditions recorded at patients' most recent 75+HA compared with standard GP consultations in the prior 24 months. However, significant differences in the types of conditions were noted, with 75+HAs significantly more likely to record elevated lipids (P<0.001), vitamin D deficiencies (P=0.004), eye/vision-related (P=0.011), diabetes (P=0.019), and hearing conditions (P=0.045) compared with standard GP consultations. Significantly more referrals (P<0.001) and new management for previously diagnosed conditions (P=0.009) occurred at 75+HA than at standard GP consultations. Patients who were receiving their first 75+HA were significantly more likely to receive vaccinations than those receiving a subsequent 75+HA (P=0.022). Conclusion 75+HAs fulfil a role in addressing chronic health problems otherwise overlooked during standard GP consultations. What is known about the topic? Since their introduction in 1999, uptake of 75+HAs has been low. Two studies from 2001 to 2002 have suggested benefits of conducting 75+HAs to identify new health problems. What does this paper add? When compared with standard GP consultations, 75+HAs identify different types of new health problems, including elevated lipids, vitamin D deficiencies, eye/vision-related conditions, diabetes, and hearing conditions. Furthermore, more referrals and new management of previously identified problems occur at 75+HA. What are the implications for practitioners? 75+HAs fulfil a role in identifying and addressing chronic health problems in older patients that may otherwise have been overlooked at standard GP consultations. Suggestions of additions to the 75+HA template are made based on common chronic conditions detected in standard consultations but not included currently within the 75+HA.