Potential benefits and pitfalls of respiratory-gated radiotherapy in the treatment of thoracic malignancy

A novel bone suppression algorithm in intensity‐based 2D/3D image registration for real‐time tumour motion monitoring: development and phantom‐based validation

Background

Real‐time tumor motion monitoring (TMM) is a crucial process for intra‐fractional respiration management in lung cancer radiotherapy. Since the tumor can be partly or fully located behind the ribs, the TMM is challenging.

Purpose

The aim of this work was to develop a bone suppression (BS) algorithm designed for real‐time 2D/3D marker‐less TMM to increase the visibility of the tumor when overlapping with bony structures and consequently to improve the accuracy of TMM.

Method

A BS method was implemented in the in‐house developed software for ultrafast intensity‐based 2D/3D tumor registration (Fast Image‐based Registration [FIRE]). The method operates on both, digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) and intra‐fractional X‐ray images. The bony structures are derived from computed tomography data by thresholding during ray‐casting, and the resulting bone DRR is subtracted from intra‐fractional X‐ray images to obtain a soft‐tissue‐only image for subsequent tumor registration. The accuracy of TMM utilizing BS was evaluated within a retrospective phantom study with nine different 3D‐printed tumor phantoms placed in the in‐house developed Advanced Radiation DOSimetry (ARDOS) breathing phantom. A 24 mm craniocaudal tumor motion, including rib eclipses, was simulated, and X‐ray images were acquired on the Elekta Versa HD Linac in the lateral and posterior–anterior directions. An error assessment for BS images was evaluated with respect to the ground truth tumor position.

Results

A total error (root mean square error) of 0.87 ± 0.23 mm and 1.03 ± 0.26 mm was found for posterior–anterior and lateral imaging; the mean time for BS was 8.03 ± 1.54 ms. Without utilizing BS, TMM failed in all X‐ray images since the registration algorithm focused on the rib position due to the predominant intensity of this tissue within DRR and X‐ray images.

Conclusion

The BS algorithm developed and implemented improved the accuracy, robustness, and stability of real‐time TMM in lung cancer in a phantom study, even in the case of rib interlude where normal tumor registration fails.

The assessment of consecutive 4D-CT scans during simulation for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy patients

Purpose: To evaluate the breathing amplitude, tumor motion, patient positioning, and treatment volumes among consecutive four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) scans, during the simulation for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Material and methods: The variation and shape of the breathing amplitude, patient positioning, and treatment volumes were evaluated for 55 lung cancer patients after consecutive 4D-CT acquisitions, scanned at one-week intervals. The impact of variation in the breathing amplitude on lung tumor motion was determined for 20 patients. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was contoured from a free-breathing CT scan and at ten phases of the respiratory cycle, for both 4D-CTs (440 phases in total).

Results: Breathing amplitude decreased by 3.6 (3.4-4.9) mm, tumor motion by 3.2 (0.4-5.0) mm while breathing period increased by 4 (2-6) s, inter-scan for 20 patients. Intra-scan variation was 4 times greater for the breathing amplitude, 5 times for the breathing period, and 8 times for the breathing cycle, comparing irregular versus regular breathing patterns for 55 patients. Using coaching, the breathing amplitude increases 3 to 8 mm, and the breathing period 2 to 6 s. Differences in the contoured treatment volumes were less than 10% between consecutive scans. Patient positioning remained stable, with a small inter-scan difference of 1.1 (0.6-1.4) mm.

Conclusion: Decreasing the inter-scan breathing amplitude decreases the tumor motion reciprocally. When the breathing amplitude decreases, the breathing period increases at inter- and intra-scan, especially during irregular breathing. Coaching improves respiration, keeping the initial shape of the breathing amplitude. Contoured treatment volumes and patient positioning were reproducible through successive scans.